• Scar --> create a digital human and predict when we fall in life and how we get scars (find data from injuries)
• Wrinckles --> find big data on wrickle structure and aging curves and investigate symbolism from reading of wrinckles 
• https://www.3dscanstore.com/3d-head-models/female-head-3d-models
• https://www.3dscanstore.com/3d-head-models/3d-face-models

• Braitenberg --> how simple machines create complex behaviors 
• Alan Turing --> if a person can't tell the difference we should treat the emotions as authentic

• The chinese room test (searle) --> that the question Hui proposed whether form or matter has the primat - so he deconstructs the hierarchy between  following instructions and intentionality --> it's interlinked 
• Searle means that if the machine doesn't know the meaning behind the symbols or the instructions it is not intelligent 
• David cole made a good counterargument 

• Heidegger, interpersonality --> how do humans respond to artificial psychological behaviour 
• Retro projected wrinckles 
• Uncanny valley 

• The machine expressing emotions as a prediction or a recognition 
• The machine exploit humans' wish to antropomorphize other things 
• The question of whether the emotions are "real" if they create an authentic response in humans brains even though the machine is following simple instructions 
• Is that also a question of form and matter --> the sign and the signifier - the symbol and the semantics --> they are interlinked (use Hui article) 

Computational machines are generally describes as "syntactic" rather than semantic machines; syntaxes are derived from forms rather than contents

This part argues that instead of approaching mass digitization projects as rationalized and instrumental projects, we should rather acknowledge them as ambivalent spatio-temporal projects of desire and uncertainty.

For example, the software that is coming into general use on all scales is mind incorporated into matter; synthetic products, polymers for example, and all such chemical derivatives, are matters that are a result of knowledge

What can be called "new materialism" shifts these dualist structures by allowing for the conceptualization of the travelling of the fluxes of nature and culture, matter and mind, and opening up active theory formation.

What we and knowledge become is not a function of truth. It’s a function of the algorithm’s output that we are told is ‘truth.”

This leads us to seek the decolonisation of power, whose aim is dismantle harmful power assymmetries and concepts of knowledge, turning us instead towards a "pluriversal epistemology of the the future" that unlike universalisms, acknowledges and supports a wider rage of socio-political, ecological cultural and economic need.

The challenge for constructing the contemporary archive is to construct one that is decentralized and remains active in the way that meanings are able to be continually produced rather than fixed in the geopolitics of time and space.

• "Digitization presents us with material structures" 
• Storing is writing something into a medium 

The image is not what is shown on the page but what exists between knowledge produced by the different output.

Humanity is controlled by nature,
nature is cultivated by humanity, electronics controls and cultivates humanity, 
humanity controls electronics and makes it evolve.
And nature contains electronics.

Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns and remembers.

Every hypertext would imply a jump from one spatiotemporal setting to another

Stiegler desconstructs it with the concept of the `origional default´... which theorizes humans as beings without origin or essense and thus vitally dependent on technical `compensations´.