https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca A student newspaper at Stanford University was searched by the police after they suspected the paper to be full of photographs and negatives that demonstrated a violent clash between police officers. A month after the search, the paper seek declaratory relief against the police officers who conducted the search, the chief of police, the district attorney and one of his deputies, and the judge who had issued the warrant. The Daily and various staff members filed a suit claiming that under the protection of the First, and Fourth Amendment, of the Constitution, the warrants were unconstitutional. en-us 2015-03-10 00:48:52 UTC 2025-10-18 16:45:00 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.storage.googleapis.com/portrait/weigh.jpg shante6006 https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52726777 The police’s search had violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press and the Fourth Amendment‘s protection against unreasonable searches.

]]> 2015-03-10 01:05:00 UTC https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52726777 shante6006 https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52727812 The court ruled against The Stanford Daily; however, Congress passed the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, which prohibits search and seizures related to journalism unless the writer is suspected of a crime.

]]> 2015-03-10 01:18:54 UTC https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52727812 shante6006 https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52728383 In this court case, Justice White delivered the majority opinion of the Court. He argued that the Fourth Amendment did not provide special search provisions for press offices. Which meant that everyone was in favor of the Zurcher officers

]]> 2015-03-10 01:26:11 UTC https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52728383 shante6006 https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52728606 2015-03-10 01:29:01 UTC https://padlet.com/shante6006/vwq0gmxdp7ca/wish/52728606