https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/vwkfn037eio1 en-us 2017-06-01 09:57:55 UTC 2017-06-01 19:44:36 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Dartstarget.png katiewoodhead123 https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/vwkfn037eio1/wish/174779626 Paragraph 1:
Strength:
+Allows the researcher to explore personal feelings about sensitive subjects. 
+Which can help to overcome barristers of power and status inequality - WC in lower streams. +Rapport easily.
+Labor's research - open up and respond fully.
+Valid data.

Limitation:
- Younger pupils have a shorter attention span - too demanding.

Paragraph 2:
Strength:
+Flexibility - freedom to vary the questions.

Limitation:
- Children may have difficulty in keeping to the point of streaming.
- May present contradictory or irrelevant responses.

Paragraph 3:
Strength:
+Gathering valid data.
+Deeper understanding of how each pupil feels about streaming and the effects of streaming on them.
+Streaming for WC pupils will bring different experiences from MC pupils.
+ WC pupils are less likely to talk positively about school.

Limitation:
- It can take a long time to interview each pupil and adult as the interviewer is likely to cater follow up questions to their responses.
- To get a good/big sample size - they will need to interview a lot of people - which will take a lot of time.

Paragraph 4:
Strength:
+Qualitative date.
+More in depth meanings.
+Draw conclusions and make comparisons.
+Interpretivists prefer.
 
Limitation:  
-Teacher too busy teaching, marking work etc - no free time.
-Pupils - who are part of anti - school subcultures refuse.
- It could have a negative impact on teachers as they could lose their jobs.
- They don't want to be seen to participate in a discriminatory practise.
- Schools may refuse access.


]]> 2017-06-01 09:59:05 UTC https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/vwkfn037eio1/wish/174779626 katiewoodhead123 https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/vwkfn037eio1/wish/174846471 Paragraph 1:
Strength:
+They can be distributed easily to large number of pupils, parents or teachers.
+They are all found in one institution.

Limitation:
-The school may not keep or may be unwilling to share an unauthorised absence list.
-May make the school look bad if a lot of pupils have bad attendance - shows the school is not doing anything about it.

Paragraph 2:
Strength:
+Establish patterns and trends in relation to unauthorised absences.
+E.g. the pupils with the highest absences may be because of caring responsibilities at home, or dislike of school, to parents arranging family holidays in term time.

Limitation:
-May not be completely truthful. 
-Teachers trying to make the school look better.
-Pupils just ticking random boxes/not actually reading the question.
-Invalid/unreliable.

Paragraph 3:
Strength:
+Schools are a good source of ready made sampling frames.
+Keep lists of pupils and staff - provide accurate sampling frame.
+Representative sample.

Limitation:
-Very low response rates especially when they ask about sensitive issues.
-May not want to discuss why they have frequent absences from school.
-Personal and private.

Paragraph 4:
Strength:
+Children have a shorter attention span.
+Short questions/questionnaires can be more effective than lengthy interviews.

Limitation:
-If the children who are absent a lot it will be harder to physically hand them the questionnaire to complete as they may not be in to receive it.
-If they are off a lot they may not be in to return it before the deadline.]]> 2017-06-01 16:20:55 UTC https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/vwkfn037eio1/wish/174846471