Does the “hero” embark on a journey in either a physical or spiritual sense?
Is there a journey to an underworld or land of the dead?
What trials or ordeals does the protagonist face? What is the reward for overcoming them?

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/722/04/

 The first thing we note is the preponderance of animus, male symbols. Only surf, webs, pleading and flailing, incurved and possibly vacuumed are feminine — the latter more on Freudian terms. And that, in a poem dealing so much with the sea, the cyclic nature of life, and with balance of land and sea, seems a fault. Certainly these webs of buildings is an unfortunate mixture of anima and animus, and indeed makes little sense on other grounds.

But what is important in Jungian theory is not the symbols as such, but the extent they are faced, understood and accommodated by the individual. To complicate matters, the poem has two individuals and a convoluted line of reasoning. Let's start with the reader addressed in the opening line. He is told about the buildings, the aggregates they are composed of, and the actions of the North Sea. Almost throughout, the imagery is drivingly energetic and aggressive. Where is the anima side? It hardly exists until the last stanza, where the reader is perhaps reintroduced with "Us".

Take the architects, who appear with the "we" in line 23. Their imagery is predominantly feminine. Does this answer the overwhelming masculine imagery before? Only if we merge the reader and the architects into one, the same persona, which makes little sense.

Analysis suggests that the personae of the poem need looking at — the reader, the bureaucrats and the architects, particularly the jump from "they" to "we" in line 23. But a larger question is the balance between the energetic masculine first three stanzas and the melancholic final stanza. There is an sense of compression, of the aggressive objectivity not being faced and absorbed by its shadow.
http://www.textetc.com/criticism/jungian-criticism.html

In order for Frodo to be considered individuated by a Jungian literary critic, he must harness the power of his shadow to achieve wholeness. This is beautifully effected by Gollum’s death, where he bites off Frodo’s finger, and then through his own malicious joy teeters on the edge of the precipice in Mount Doom’s cavern before falling into the molten lava below, thus completing Frodo’s quest.

The theme of relatedness between Frodo and Gollum is remarkably consistent in the novel as Frodo is first revolted by, and then comes to pity Gollum. Frodo needs him psychologically to fulfill his task. Further, Frodo represents individuation by leaving Middle Earth to dwell forever for the elves in a paradise like place. A fully individuated character no longer belongs in the real world, as individuation is a lifelong process."

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-jungian-literary-criticism.htm

2) The Imaginary Order. 
This is what marks the transition from the primal need to Lacan's concept of demand. While the needs of a baby, for example, a demand to Lacan is intrinsically unsatisfiable. This stage is defined by the relationship between the self and the object that is desired to be a part of the self. for example, "once a child begins to recognize that its body is separate from the world and its mother, it begins to feel anxiety, which is caused by a sense of something lost. The demand of the child, then, is to make the other a part of itself, as it seemed to be in the child's now lost state of nature (the neo-natal months). The child's demand is, therefore, impossible to realize and functions, ultimately, as a reminder of loss and lack". This imaginary state continues to hold influence throughout the adult life. 

3) The Symbolic Order (or the "big Other"). 
Whereas the imaginary is all about equations and identifications, the symbolic is about language and narrative. Once a child enters into language and accepts the rules and dictates of society, it is able to deal with others. The acceptance of language's rules is aligned with the Oedipus complex, according to Lacan. The symbolic is made possible because of your acceptance of the father, those laws and restrictions that control both your desire and the rules of communication: "It is in the name of the father that we must recognize the support of the symbolic function which, from the dawn of history, has identified his person with the figure of the law". Through recognition of the Name-of-the-Father, you are able to enter into a community of others. The symbolic, through language, is "the pact which links... subjects together in one action. The human action par excellence is originally founded on the existence of the world of the symbol, namely on laws and contracts".

https://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/psychoanalysis/lacandesire.html