Lit Review Standardisation by Usic https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e en-us 2020-05-27 13:33:28 UTC 2020-05-27 14:58:47 UTC hello@padlet.com Group 3 Belle, Rob, Sean, Margaret usictech https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e/wish/596934401 LR1
we disagreed a bit
Structure
sean: not review of research literature
no gap before conclusion
Sources
listing
Voice
limited interpretation/critique so does not lead to research gap
Overall grade
I said 52 (group 60)

LR2

Structure Poor choice of headings, misleading, poorly sequenced

Sources
Plagiarised
Voice
no commentary
Overall grade 42

LR3

Structure
Clear structure
Sources
Proper citations
Voice
Clear interpretation and critique

minor punctutation mistakes
Word count: 1735
Overall grade: 65
]]> 2020-05-27 13:36:18 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e/wish/596934401 Group 2: Cassie - Lukasz - Peter - Jane usictech https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e/wish/596938348 LR1:

Structure: Long intro, some parts are too general (adv & disadv), no clear move from general to spefic. Too many headings - can group last two headings under 1 heading.

Sources: over reliance on some sources

Voice: very little critique, a bit of interpretation

Overall grade: 53

LR2

Structure: too general, many unhelpful headings, no conclusion, sudden move

Sources: not well supported

Voice: no interpreation/critique

Overall grade: 43

LR3

Structure: Well-structured, heading 2.4 too general

Sources: good synthesis, claims are well supported

Voice: good interpretion and crique

Overall grade: 70]]> 2020-05-27 13:38:04 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e/wish/596938348 Group 1 Gem, Eyal, Anna, Michelle, Tomek usictech https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e/wish/596939175 LR1

Structure misses research gap in penultimate paragraph /headings at times too broad - need specification

Tomek - the student seemed to be confused about the purpose of LR (he was explaining the topic rather than present literature on the topic) big contrast with Example 3

Sources overuse sources in 2.4 and 2.7. Little synthesis but attempts made. 12 good sources - valid, relevant, academic

Voice Little to no critique; some interpretation

Overall grade 55

LR2

Structure reads like summaries not a review - little synthesis

Sources overuse of some sources and do not provide enough support for their claims.

Voice no critique / missing conclusion

Overall grade 45

LR3

Structure as instructed - great synthesis - blend 3 or more sources

Great sources current and varied. Only 2 sources in 2.4 - include one more maybe to strengthen argument. But good critique. Big weakest no enough development in 2.5 about the gap.

Voice Strong critique throughout

tomek - I think the materials are not really elaborating enough on the research gap- and its importance

excellent synthesis, but not a valid gap: saying that it wasn't tested in UK too is not justified

Anna - weak headings

Overall grade 68-70]]> 2020-05-27 13:38:25 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/vq0vtakj3fex7k2e/wish/596939175