<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>My radiant padlet by Sydney Cherry</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90</link>
      <description>Made with serendipity</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-11-08 23:48:37 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-10-14 07:34:28 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Were the &quot;cult of domesticity&quot; and the rise of the child-centered family signs of an improvement or a restriction in women&#39;s status and condition?</title>
         <author>sydneyccherry</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136268369</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Yes, the cult of domesticity improved women's place because it bolstered the importance of their work in the home and made their decisions all the more important with more moral power. This is often referred to as the domestic feminism because even though they were still in the homes, they were growing in power. With smaller amounts of children, there was more power on the mother to raise better children almost as if that as their job. Which to many women was an accomplishment. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/141221051/ec7140954a17b84d0db522bad3ddca57/mother.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-08 23:48:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136268369</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Was the &quot;new family&quot; a progressive reflection of American democratic ideals, or a restriction on them? </title>
         <author>sydneyccherry</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136273967</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This is a progressive reflection. First, it allowed women to feel more liberty in raising their kids because they are having fewer so it was like it was truly their job to raise the child correctly. The mother had the power to teach them morals and put more emphasis on one child. The emphasis on one child resulted in an emphasis to make sure that one child was independent and could do on its own. I think that this is progressive because it's giving women more duties and its putting more pressure on these children to be independent which also pushes the progressive movement. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/141221051/a5ee0161b1b1dcf2d579442a3ef3e26f/cult.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-09 00:44:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136273967</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why did America produce so many reform and utopian movements? What did they contribute to American culture?</title>
         <author>sydneyccherry</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136275383</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This was brought by the amount of people advocating for change during this time period. These offered refuge from current cities and focused on a lot of the reform movements like prisons, schools, etc. These were to model a perfect American society with many freedoms. These made America more liberal in reforms and more cognizant of the changes the people wanted enacted. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/141221051/99293725d77312ad3fee552867d13114/utopia.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-09 00:58:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136275383</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How does the Second Great Awakening of the nineteenth century compare to the Great Awakening of the eighteenth century?</title>
         <author>sydneyccherry</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136275996</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Both of the movements increased women participation in the churches. Many of the Second Great Awakens advocated for personal salvation and deism which was similar to the Great Awakening. Both relied heavily on emotion and gathering in places listening to speeches and sermons. The Second Great Awakening seemed to spark much more social change than the First. The Second came out at a time of many social changes so much of the Second had developed more religions and more acceptance of Catholics than the First. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/141221051/589644995420dd0addc3cf8af8949f36/second.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-09 01:04:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136275996</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>After you have read &quot;Contending Voices: The Role of Women&quot; can you analyze both excerpts intended audience, purpose, and point of view?</title>
         <author>sydneyccherry</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136277044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The audience of this would presumably be the women involved in these meetings (Elizabeth Cady Staton) and the people of government who would be legislating the women's suffrage movement. The purpose would be to belittle the current movement and remind people of women's place. Lastly, the point of view would be of someone who doesn't believe women should have increased rights and needs to stay where they are. The next one is a response to these comments. The purpose would be to refute what was previously said and state that he is wrong. The audience would be who wrote the original paper and women apart of the movement who need to keep fighting back. The point of view would be someone who believes that women deserve to have these meetings and more rights. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/141221051/375b7cc74e8b110df45a13d421354a00/wommen.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-09 01:13:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136277044</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>In this chapter, the authors reference a British critic in 1820 who said, &quot;In the four quarters of the globe who reads an American book, or goes to an American play, or looks at an American picture or statue?&quot; Yet, they also trace the development of uniquely American forms of art, architecture, and literature in the 19th century. Explain the changes in American art, architecture and literature from 1790-1860?</title>
         <author>sydneyccherry</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136278168</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Early American builders modeled a plan called the Federal Style. This style was architecture that was like classical Greek and Roman buildings. There was also a Greek revival in architecture so lots of Gothic styles began to emerge. In art, painters began going from human portraits and historical paintings to local landscapes. As well as with the development of the photograph, artists were challenged. With literature, romanticism emerged rather than what used to be Enlightment. Now, literature was based off of imagination and emotion rather than the senses and truth. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/141221051/79c41745d6ba7ba417023a3a2824ab59/feder.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-09 01:21:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sydneyccherry/vmfanmzmig90/wish/136278168</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
