https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh en-us 2018-09-10 11:33:24 UTC 2025-09-30 16:04:34 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279455975 1. This example is not absolutism because the monarchs shared the responsibility and power of the country's finances with the Parliament. 
2. This is absolutism because in China they believe the emperors were sons from Heaven. The emperors served as the head of their state and their army. 
3. I believe this is absolutism because  the monarchs are chosen and they regard the Quran and they also have final authority over all state affairs. 
4. This is absolutism because  Mussolini had complete control of his military and the Italian government, and he also became the dictator for Italy.]]> 2018-09-10 15:13:00 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279455975 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456062 1. In my opinion, this is not absolutism because they had to work with a Parliament to govern the country. They also lost their power to suspend their laws. 
2. This is absolutism because they believed there was only one Heaven, there was only one ruler. That being said, the emperor felt like he was chosen by God.
3. This is absolutism because the kings can choose to dissolve both government bodies. Also they had one king that controlled the land
4. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:13:12 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456062 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456173 1. This is not an example of absolutism because England had a parliament and weren't in charge by themselves.  (parliament has power too)
2. This absolutism because the Chinese emperor believed he was a son on heaven, and he could not be challenged by anyone else. 
3. This is absolutism because it says that the king has the final say over all state affairs. 
4. This last one is absolutism because Benito Mussolini had complete power of the government and the military. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:13:26 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456173 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456243 1. This example is not absolutism because the monarch did not rule alone and had to govern the country with the parliament. 

2. This is an example of absolutism because they believed in only one ruler. The law said that the position could not be challenged by anyone. 

3. This is not an example of absolutism. Even though it is not required to work with anyone else the issues are decided by the King and the Council of Members etc. 

4. This is an example of absolutism because he has complete control over military and etc.

]]> 2018-09-10 15:13:35 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456243 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456313 1.) I think the first paragraph is not absolutism because of parliament, which meant that King William and Queen Mary  were not the only people with power and authority. 

2.) I think the second paragraph demonstrates absolutism because there was only one emperor who was in power and made all the decisions. 

3.) I think the third paragraph is an 
example of absolutism because they had one king who demands and controls everything and everyone. 

4.) I think the fourth paragraph is 
absolutism because there was only one prime minister and ]]> 2018-09-10 15:13:43 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456313 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456672 1. It is not absolutism because they had a parliament, and they were not the only people in charge. 
2. This is absolutism because the emperor was the only one making all of the decisions for the country. 
3. Saudi Arabia is absolutism because even though he has government groups, he has the final say on everything. 
4. This is absolutism because they had no political parties or election, and he was the only ruler. Also he was a dictator, which means total power over a country.]]> 2018-09-10 15:14:20 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279456672 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457019 1. I believe that this is not absolutism because they still had to deal with a "bill of rights," and they had to share power with the Parliament. 
2. I believe that this is absolutism because they felt as if someone was called from Heaven, and that there was only one person to be in charge.
3. I believe that this is not absolutism because the ruler was chosen by the Royal family, which is showing that the Royal family had more power to be able to chose someone, and they would have had to have absolutism in accordance to the Qur'an and Shari'ah
4. I believe that this is absolutism because the ruler has the ability to banish whatever whenever, meaning its his preference as to if it stays or not.]]> 2018-09-10 15:15:07 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457019 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457120 1. This is not absolutism because the monarchy is working with Parliament to govern the country. Monarchs often lost their power to suspend the laws.
2. This is absolutism because, according to law, the emperor's position could not be challenged by anyone, and they chose whether or not to listen to advisors.
3. This is absolutism because although state issues are decided on by the king and the two councils, the king maintains final authority.
4. This is absolutism because he had complete control over the Italian government, and he eliminated all political parties.]]> 2018-09-10 15:15:23 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457120 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457295 1. This is not absolutism because although King William and Queen Mary were ruling monarchs, they had a the Bill of Rights. They had to share their power with the Parliament. 
2. This is an example of absolutism because there was one emperor with all the power. The emperor couldn't be overthrown and made all of the decisions.
3. This is not absolutism because the monarchs are chosen by others, and they don't make all of the decisions on their own. 
4. This is an example of absolutism because the Prime Minister had full control over Italy. He had complete control over the Italian government at one point. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:15:45 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457295 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457319 1 This is not an example of absolutism because The monarchs agree to a bill of rights.'
2.Yes, absolutism is shown in this example because The emperor was belived to be chosen by god and was in complete power.
3.This is also an example of absolutism, absolutism is shown by the king have absolute power over political parties.
4.Benito Mussolini was an absolutist, he became the most and only person in power and demolished all other parties.]]> 2018-09-10 15:15:50 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457319 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457396 1 this is not absolutism because the Parliament had power as well as the monarchy
2 this is absolutism because the emperors had the power to choose the other government leaders in order to have better control over china and no one could challenge his role as emperor
3 this is absolutism because the king has complete power over the government at all times and has final say on all laws.
4 this is and absolutist state because Mussolini had complete power over Italy.

]]> 2018-09-10 15:15:59 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457396 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457412 1. This is not absolutism because the monarchs were forced to work with Parliament, so the power was shared.
2. This is absolutism because the Chinese monarchs were believed to be chosen by the heavens, and they had complete power.
3. This is not absolutism because the ruler is chosen by others and not themselves and they must work in conjunction with other groups, so they do not have absolute power, though they have a lot.
4. This is absolutism because Mussolini was in control of everything and eliminated anything that prevented his absolute power. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:16:01 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457412 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457480 1. The first example with King William and Queen Mary is not absolutism because they signed the bill of rights stating that Parliament would work with them on governing the country.

2. The second example is definitely absolutism because they are the sons of the heaven and there is only one single ruler. 

3. The third example is also absolutism because the ruler has the final decision 

4. The last example is also absolutism because be became a dictator and ruled all. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:16:10 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457480 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457505 1.) This paragraph does not represent absolutism because the English Bill of Rights "requires the monarchy to work with Parliament to govern the country". They also lost the power to suspend laws.
2.) This paragraph does represent absolutism because it is said that there could only be one ruler. That ruler has control over everything, deciding who the governors are to help spread his own power.
3.) This is not an example of absolutism because there are government bodies and a Council of Ministers to aid the Monarchs even though the Monarch makes the final decision over state affairs.
4.) This is definitely an example of absolutism because Mussolini became the dictator of Italy, abolishing all other political opinions taking full control of power.]]> 2018-09-10 15:16:12 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457505 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457568 1. I think this is not absolutism because it is talking about the monarchs and how they had to work with the Parliament. 
2. This is absolutism because there was only one person, the emperor ruling and making decisions. 
3. This is absolutism because there is one ruler making decisions and ruling. 
4. This is absolutism because Benito Mussolini is ruling and putting restraints on his power so he is the only one making decisions and ruling. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:16:20 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279457568 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279458641 1. This is not an example of Absolutism because King William and Queen Mary were rulers, but they did not have full power. They often had to refer to the Parliament and the House of Commons. 
2. The Emperors of China demonstrated absolutism. They were considered to be the Son of Heaven and ruled over all under royalty and did not have to listen to their advisors.
3. This is not Absolutism because they do not have full power. They are chossen
4. ]]> 2018-09-10 15:18:21 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279458641 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279460150 1. This is not absolutism because King William and Queen Mary never had full control or power although they were rulers. The Parliament and House of commons were often in power.
2. This is Absolutism because they were chosen by Heaven.]]> 2018-09-10 15:20:44 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/vcivelgev2lh/wish/279460150