https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj Made with fortitude en-us 2017-05-01 10:04:32 UTC 2017-05-04 04:09:22 UTC hello@padlet.com shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169133156 How do brain structures in other animals compare with those in humans?
Hypothesis:
It is predicted that the brain of animals have the same emotional and cognitive responses to the human brain. 



]]> 2017-05-01 10:05:22 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169133156 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169133223 scientists have observed the brain of many different species and have discovered that the brains of different animals come in different shapes and sizes; does this affect the cognitive function of the brain? Does this affect how animals perceive emotions? Perhaps there may be different connections among neuron  in the brains of animals. However one thing remains is that animals have different sized brains and structures.

Emotional: relating to a person's emotions.
Cognitive: the state of having in consistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, as relating to behavioural decisions and attitude change.  ]]> 2017-05-01 10:05:55 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169133223 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563183 Aim:
to compare emotional brain functions, structure and cognitive features of humans and other animals. 
Procedure:
step 1: reach with a neuroscientist about how animals and humans feel emotions very differently that it makes human emotions harder to study.
step 2: identify how structure brain and animal by testing emotions response.
step 3: using PET or FMRI to detect changes in large- scale electrical potentials or changes in regional blood flow in brain regions that are correlated to an emotional   related reaction.   
Results:
another artifactual source of the discrepancy between human and animal affective neuroscience comes from the fact the most current studies of humans tend to focus on brain activation that is correlated to emotions wheres studies of animals focus to a greater extent to manipulating that cause observable changes in emotional reaction. the main evidence for a differences is that emotions processes may be more susceptible to disruption cortical damage in humans then in other animals.
conclusion: human affective neuroscience has been dominated by correlational studies of neural activation, whereas animal neuroscience has given greater weight to causal studies involves brain manipulation that change emotional states and reaction  ]]> 2017-05-02 23:48:04 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563183 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563466 The same brain structures are implicated in affective reactions for both humans and other animals. the broad range of cognitive cases, which includes teaching, causal reasoning, short- term memory and planning. consistently shows fundamental limitations in the animal version of human competence.The reaches didn't test all animals brain and human brain. 
human bias wanting to prove their research is correct. ]]> 2017-05-02 23:51:16 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563466 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563606 People need to give permission in studies. researches cant hurt people and also cant hurt animal as well. ]]> 2017-05-02 23:52:46 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563606 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563654 The evidence i have found from the two researches that i did did not support my hypothesis. There are few similarities between the human and animal brain emotional structure, but there was also some differences such as, language and differences in emotions processes. chimpanzees have no language of any kind, recursive or non- recursive. also, emotions processes may be some what more susceptible to disruption cortices damage in humans then in other animals. 
the research findings can be benefit the relevant society because it benefit them by showing similarities and differences between animal and human brain structure. it assists their knowledge by being able to identify their emotional and cognitive changes. it is a study that can only benefit psychologists that are interested in researches in human and animal brain structures. the hypothesis was proved because their are similarities and differences between emotional and cognitive response. ]]> 2017-05-02 23:53:26 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563654 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563879 source 1:
Berridge, Kent C, report, comparing the emotional brains of humans and other animals.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1955772/
source 2: Premark, David, report; human and animal cognition: continuity and discontinuity.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/295b/adab3664eb934f27bcc246b268bf029e9269.pdf]]> 2017-05-02 23:56:21 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169563879 shohanihoda https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169582033 Aim:
in the case study about human and animals cognition, the continuity and discontinuity about how connectivity among nerve cells in human and chimpanzees brains.
Procedure:
step 1: place brain structure of human and animals brain under a microscopic study.
 step 2: examine the human brain and how revealed neural structure, enhanced writing, an form of connectivity among nerve cells are not found in any animals challenging the view that human brain is simply and enlarged chimpanzee.
step 4: cognitive resarch can be found by placing structures in an MRI scan to see which parts of the brain are activated. 
step 5: neural findings are based on micospic study and the MRI results of the brain of humans and animals, then the structure are compared. 
Results:
eight cognitive cases were examined, teaching a short- term, causal reasoning planning, deception, transitive inference, theory of mind and language. human language are recursive. chimpanzees have no language any kind, recursive or non- recursive. also it proven by plovers display that chimpanzees and human are both able to display deception in taken as unequivocal evidence of reasoning in humans. 
conclusion: animal competencies are mainly adaptions restricted to a single goal.  

]]> 2017-05-03 03:10:59 UTC https://padlet.com/shohanihoda/vbzex0q74nzj/wish/169582033