https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag en-us 2018-01-24 13:53:34 UTC 2026-02-26 10:04:30 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330261628 What is a peer review?
A process where academics/researchers evaluate the quality of other academics work.
What is the process?
1. Submitting the article to a journal where the journal editor will decide if it is suitable.
2. The editor will contact two/three other researchers who will read your article and advise the editor. (Originality, presentation of results, conclusion, standard)
3. Taking on board recommendations from previous stages. Changing article and resubmitting until accepted.
Why is it used?
To help the publisher decide whether a piece of work is valid, factual and suitable enough for publication.
Where would you find peer review content?
- Library article databases (will be tagged as peer-reviewed)
- Can be published in journals and as articles
What is the potential problem with peer review?
- Takes away originality
- Takes away opinion 
- Biased opinion from person who is peer reviewing it. 
- Time consuming - less care taken over time.
- Relies on volunteers - hard to find suitable volunteers.
- Plagiarism (other researchers might copy the work and submit it to another journal).  


]]> 2019-02-12 10:41:25 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330261628 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330261956 Experts in your field will be asked to read your article, and advise the editor whether to publish your paper in that journal.

What is the process?
At this first stage, the journal editor will decide if it’s suitable for the journal. The editor might reject the article immediately, but otherwise it will move to the next stage, and into peer review.

Why is it used?
to tell you if any changes need to be made before it can be published.

Where would you find peer review content?

What is the potential problem with peer review?

-Doesn't stop bad articles passing through anyway
-




]]> 2019-02-12 10:42:37 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330261956 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330262064 A peer review is the process where independent experts (Peers) evaluate and comment on your research. These Peers work inside the same academic field as you.


1) Submission

2)The submission will either be rejected if it doesn't meet the basic criteria and sent back to you, or it will be accepted for review by the Chief Editor (First Screening)

3) It Is then seen and lby two separate reviewers


4) The Chief Editor will see the text next, before a 3rd reviewer hecks grammar.

5) The Author will revise

6) There will be a second review by the Chief Editor.

7) If accepted for publication, it will be sent to the Editorial Board meeting

8) It will then go through the publishing process



It ensures that submitted articles are suitable for the readers of the journal, and it helps create a constructive discussion.



Anonymous peer review prevent the Author from knowing who has evaluated their text.

]]> 2019-02-12 10:43:05 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330262064 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292353 Peer review is the process of evaluating a scholars work.

Allowing your peers or people who work in a similar field to evaluate your work and provide feedback 

It is used to ensure that work being published in certain/specific journals are accurate and reliable. If other scholars evaluate the research, it can be improved prior to publishing. 

Some potential problems with peer review are:
- Peers may have prejudice 
- The process is time consuming
- Peers may plagiorise work 
- Papers may be judged on the reputation of the author instead of the quality of the work
- The decision making power rests in the hands of the editors which could lead to misuse of authority 

]]> 2019-02-12 12:41:56 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292353 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292428 What is a Peer review?
A process where colleagues or experts review and evaluate your research to further validate and confirm a hypothesis.
What is the process?
1. Write the thing.
2. Give it to a colleague or expert to go through it and give feedback.
3. Correct the wrongs and add any other information which is given from the peer.
Why is it used?
For accuracy and to further validate a hypothesis which may be evident in the thing.
Where would you find peer review content?
Libraries, scholar based websites and universities.
What is the potential problem with peer reviews?
Regular human error, going too deep into a particular subject and missing the main point. If the peer is not informed or educated on the subject which is being reviewed, their input can be seen as invalid or even bias. ]]> 2019-02-12 12:42:12 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292428 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292433 A peer review is where academics and peers in a similar field review your work to validate the research.

Step 1: The process begins by submitting your article. The editor will then decide if it's suitable for the journal or not.
Step 2: The first round of reviews take place. The editor will contact 2 or 3 other experts in your field. Then you'll be given feedback telling you what changes you should make.
Step 3: You revise your article and then resubmit it. You may or may not be asked to make further changes.
Step 4: Accepted. Next is production.

Why is it used? 
It it used to help validate research and make sure all of your findings are accurate. The process also helps the editor decide whether to use your work or not.

Where would you find peer review content?
You can find peer reviewed content in the library database. They can also be found in journals.

What is the potential problem with peer reviews?

The reviewers could be biased against you or your topic.
Some reviewers can turn out to be fake in the modern day.
Not all problems may be found.

]]> 2019-02-12 12:42:14 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292433 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292649
What is a peer review:
After completing a journal, the editor will decide if you have followed the journal's guidelines, if it is useful for the readers and if the journal is suitable for the article.
 What is the process:
the editor will contact 2-3 experts in the journal's fields. 
They will read the interview and decide whether the editor should publish it. 
The journal needs to be original, have a clear structure and be reliable.

If this process is accepted, you may edit the journal based upon the reviewer's comments. The experts or editors may ask you to make further research before publishing it.

If the previous step is followed thoroughly, then your journal will go through production/publishing.

why is it useful:
It allows professionals to confirm whether your research is accurate and your conclusions and evaluation is consistant. Peer reviews ensure that the journal adheres to the editor's standards.

Problems: 
Biased.
Time-consuming: experts very busy.


]]> 2019-02-12 12:43:08 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292649 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292768 Peer review is when people with knowledge in the area check other people's work.
It identifies errors and gaps in knowledge as well as creating discussion, making sure it is suitable for publication.
It is supervised by an editor, with 2-3 peers conducting independent reviews which the editor will then assess. The author can the make edits and resubmit until it is accepted for publication into a journal.
Potential problems: time consuming, disagreements, differing standards, questionable integrity, not as much scope for new ideas, anonymity issues in small fields, occasional fake reviewers, bias and competition, stealing papers and ideas.


]]> 2019-02-12 12:43:33 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330292768 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330293368 WOT IZ PER REEVU?
A peer review is the process of having your journal or piece of writing reviewed by your peers (academics and experts in similar fields)  in order  to eliminate errors or gaps in your research and allow it to be published.
WHAT IS THE PROCESS?
1. YOU SUBMIT YOUR WORK TO A PUBLISHER
2. THEY SEND IT TO 2 OR 3 PEERS TO READ AND GIVE FEEDBACK ON
3. THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE SENT BACK TO THE PUBLISHER
4.THE AUTHOR IS INFORMED AND DECIDE WHETHER TO AMEND THEIR WORK AND RESUBMIT
5. PROCESS REPEATS IF UNSUCCESSFUL 
WHY IS IT USED?
To ensure that their is no mistakes and it is factually correct, making it suitable for publishing.
POTENTIAL ISSUES?
Bias of peers?
Creative differences on a personal level

]]> 2019-02-12 12:45:34 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330293368 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330295788 2019-02-12 12:54:02 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330295788 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330296314 2019-02-12 12:55:49 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330296314 https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330296344 2019-02-12 12:55:56 UTC https://padlet.com/lada_price/v61ctgi2imag/wish/330296344