Timeline by Kailee Deuell

Korematsu vs. United States 1942

kdeuell — 2023-12-15 16:10:46 UTC

In 1942 after the attack on pearl harbor President Roosevelt signed an order to have all Japanese American to the west coast for interment camps. However a Japanese American Korematsu felt his rights were violated, he did refuse to relocate, later was found and convicted for violating orders. He felt his due process from the fifth amendment was violated. The supreme court later ruled that his fifth amendment rights were not violated and it was constitutional because of the out way of the united states being in war. This case negatively impacted the founding ideal rights even at a time of war people should not have their rights violated.

Mapp vs. Ohio 1961

kdeuell — 2023-12-15 16:47:02 UTC

In 1961 in Cleveland Ohio a home-owner named Dollree "Dolly" Mapp had an unexcepted visit from law enforcement with no warrant, they forced their way into her home looking for a suspected harboring bomber only to find a trunk full obscene photos and Mapp was arrested. This case has a strong connection to the 4th amendment. Dolly Mapp did indeed argue that her 4th amendment was violated. The supreme court ruled that the evidence seizured was unlawful and unconstitutional without of search warrant the evidence found in her home couldn't be used in criminal prosecution. The founding ideals for this case positively impacted Mapp because liberty and equality for all no matter what context.

Engel vs. Vitale 1962

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 19:33:11 UTC

In 1962 the New York board regents created an policy that all school districts must recite a voluntary prayer at the start of every school morning. Many parents and guardians felt that this was a violation of the children's first amendment right. This ruling impacted family's because the Board did favor one religion in particular.

The founding ideals of this case is are liberty because it negatively impacted the liberty of young minors.

Tinker vs. Des Moines 1965

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 19:58:22 UTC

In Des Moines Iowa, Mary Beth Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt and John Tinker wanted to support a truce against the Vietnam war by wearing a black armband, But principals of the school created a policy consisting of the ban of the armbands. If a student wore an armband to school they would be asked to remove it but if the student refused they would be sent home, the parents sued the school because the school violated the students first amendment rights. The interpretation of the case is that the policy the school created was unconstitutional and a violation of the student liberty to show support against war, and is a negative impact of there equality.

Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 20:20:52 UTC

In march of 1963 a man named Ernesto Miranda was arrested. He was questioned by police officers, they believe he is in connection with murder and rape. The police obtained a written confession from Miranda, he didn't have an attorney present nor know his right for one. the impact of the ruling stayed the same but the bill of rights changed. The Supreme court ruled that Miranda guilty. The founding ideals for this case is negatively impacting his rights because he didn't know his own rights.

Furman vs. Georgia 1969

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 20:40:09 UTC

In 1969 a man named William Henry Furman a black man form Georgia was convicted of murder in the first degree in the state of Georgia, Later Furman was charged with the death penalty because it's unconstitutional to kill a human being. This case connected to the 8th amendment because it may have been an cruel and unusual punishment. while the ruling of the case stayed the same he was found guilty and sentenced to death but the punishment was never performed. the founding ideals for his case affected democracy because of the way of how the case was performed and how society protested the cruel and unusual punishment.

Gregg vs. Georgia 1976

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 20:59:29 UTC

On December 11th 1976 Troy Leon Gregg was convicted of 2 murders in the state of Georgia and was later sentenced to a death penalty. Georgia Courts argued that his rights had been violated to be more specific the 8th and 14th amendment. During the final case his rights stayed the same they weren't violated and the death penalty was still in motion. Troy Leon Gregg was eventually killed his founding ideals were positivly impacting his rights because no one who has murdered should stay alive.

Ingraham vs. Wright 1977

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 21:15:42 UTC

in 1970 a case called Ingraham vs. Wright, A child named James Ingrid was held down and beaten by his middle school administrator at least twenty times. Same with another student named James Ingraham, he was beaten with a wooden paddle since he didn't move swiftly at a direction given by the teacher. He was beaten 20 times. Many family's at Charles drew junior middle school in Florida pleaded to court that the school was violating there 8th amendment by being cruel to them by using a wooden paddle. The court ruled in favor of the school system because they agreed that the punishment and due process rights for students are determined in school. The founding ideals for this case is liberty, and equality because students do have a right to decide there punishment's and beating kids is not the right thing to do.

Hazelwood School District vs. Kuhlmeier 1983

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 21:29:48 UTC

May 1983 Cathy Kuhlmeier protested school newspaper censorship, that were written and edited by students one day a principal of the district found two articles stating inappropriate topics consisting of teen pregnancy and parent divorce so he with held the 2 articles from being published, Cathy was not happy with this decision and took it to court. Her and her family had felt that her and fellow students including herself had their first amendment rights taken away from them. the ruling reversed and was in favor of the school, and the school doesn't have to allow student speech in newspapers. this negatively impacts the students because they lost there freedom of speech which is connected to liberty, so the students could have felt that they were silenced.

New Jersey vs. T.L.O. 1985

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 21:39:04 UTC

In January 15th of 1985, a 14 year old girl and her friend were found in the bathroom smoking during a class period, the school questioned both the girls, while the other student admitted to the allegation T.L.O. denied them. looking for last resorts to find the girl guilty of her acts the school searched he school bag finding many cigarettes, money, and drugs. After these Finding the school contacted the police and then brought her to the police station. She felt this search of her bag wasn't necessary and violated her 4th amendment right. The impact of the ruling stayed the same, the court ruled it didn't violate the students rights because of the activities she hobbied at school.

Bethel School District vs. Fraser 1986

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 21:55:26 UTC

in 1986 a boy named Matthew Fraser a High School student from Bethel High School in Washington was running for a spot for school government he was warned by school staff that his speech wasn't appropriate he did however still deliver his speech with many sexual innuendos/references he did violate the school policy causing a three day suspension. He did sue the school because he believed that his 1st amendment rights were violated by the school. while the Court ruling stayed the same, the court believed his right were not violated because schools shouldn't have to deal with lewd and obscene speech's. While the founding ideals are liberty that negatively impacts student but positively impact the school because now they don't have to deal with speech's like his.

Vernonia vs. Acton 1995

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 22:05:38 UTC

in 1995 Oregon, Athletes in Vernonia high school tested positive for use of drugs. James Acton a student for Vernonia felt that the tests weren't needed and refused to take one. He was later not able to participate in his schools football program until he did take one. He and his parents did sue the school for violations of the 4th amendment. while the ruling of the, drug testing did stay the same and was found constitutional and doesn't violate the children's fourth amendment because they believe that it protects minors. while the founding ideals positively impact equality because if one student that participates in sports and does use drug it can provide a helping hand to win instead of a child who doesn't use drug when competing in that certain sport.

Elonis v. United States 1989

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 22:21:40 UTC

In 1989 a man named Anthony Elonis threatened his for "posting threats to injure his coworkers, his wife, the police, a kindergarten class, and a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent on Facebook." from Oyez.com But the district court argued that these threats are real and fall way out of line with his first amendment right. After the posts had been taken to court he felt like his first amendment right was violated. but the court ruled majority 8-1. The right stayed the same and found the prosecution guilty and that they were real threats. the founding ideals are positively affecting rights by looking at the evidence and only that while making a decision to keep citizens safe.

Mahanoy Area Highschool v. B.L. 2021

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 22:33:58 UTC

B.L. in Mahanoy high school student didn't make the varsity cheerleading squad nor getting the position she wanted in the softball tryouts had an outbreak on the social platform called snapchat and multiple of her teammates saw the post and told the coach, her coaches found this as a violation and was suspended from both teams because of her actions. reparents sued the school in violation of the schools first amendment rights. The right had expanded for her because the court ruled that the school was violating the students rights. the founding ideals for this case is positively affecting the students rights because B.L. felt heard.

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer 2023

kdeuell — 2023-12-17 22:36:09 UTC

2023 A woman named "Deborah Laufer, a prolific litigant with physical disabilities and vision impairments, sued Acheson Hotels for failing to publish information about their accessibility on their website, which is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)." from Oyez.com But the district dismissed the case. while the outcome of this case is still going on my prediction of the outcome will be that Deborah will win the case because equality for all should include amenities for the disabled at hotels.