<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Design on Nature - Jasanoff chapter 4 &amp; 5 by Astrid</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f</link>
      <description>
Adding a post is easy, just double click on the Padlet. You can comment on posts made by others.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-01-28 12:23:32 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-10-13 15:55:21 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>How were public concerns about food deliberated across different political systems?Pages 121-143</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225372974</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 12:36:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225372974</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225374500</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://admin.stsprogram.org/files/people/Sheila_Jasanoff2-300x300.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 12:54:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225374500</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did each government manage science&#39;s relation with the public in order to calm angst and distrust? pp97-116</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225375002</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:00:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225375002</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chapter 5: Food for Thought (119- 145)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225375374</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:05:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225375374</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Greening of Biotechnology - Three Tales</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225375978</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:10:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225375978</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>United States - Science Speaks</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376266</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>what do we learn from the ice minus story?<br><br>Researchers were able to cross the line between peer-reviewed basic science and its regulated applications.<br>They wanted to prevent crops from freezing and destroying the crops during the colder months.<br>It brought controversy through it being sold and used without any&nbsp; experimentation of the product. &nbsp;<br>Also ecologists believed it could release uncertainties that cannot be resolved with the current knowledge they have. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:14:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376266</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1975 Asilomar Conference </title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376445</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/455290a">https://www.nature.com/articles/455290a</a><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:16:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376445</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Britain - Expertise Governs</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376698</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1988 British election - Tory party introduced more environmental concern to their manifesto to compete with social and lib dem turning the environment into a campaign issue<br>- Experienced managerial scientists: David Bishop. His approaches to reassure the public and secure public trust helped initially Britain avoid public angst. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:19:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376698</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Germany Procedure Rules</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376725</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Passing of a new genetic engineering law (p.103)<br>Green acitivism held GenTG responsible for empirical methodology -  'law required that releases should produce no unjustified harmful effects on humans, animals, plants, or the environment and property.' (p.104)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:19:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225376725</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>what is co-production?</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225378003</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-28 13:34:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225378003</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Taming risks requires work- Who does this work and by what rules of the game? </title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225545880</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 10:18:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225545880</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What impacts did the UK BSE crisis have on support for agricultural biotechnology and GM foods?p.111, p.121-125</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225546203</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>UK: BSE posed as a "visible threat" to "expert authority"- downfall in support for agricultural biotechnology- BSE turned to CJD and was killing humans- crisis, worldwide ban on imports of British beef worldwide. Breakdown in confidence of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food. New departments to help deal with this and prevent it from happening again.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 10:19:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225546203</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Britain: GM in the Shadow of BSE  (121-130)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225546360</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 10:20:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225546360</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Unraveling: Normalization Breaks Down (106-117)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225547198</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 10:23:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225547198</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>United States: Science Confounds Science</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225566644</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The main concern of the public was the possible risk that GMOs may cause health and environmental issues.&nbsp;<br>In order to ease the public, "scientific" and "risk assessments" (p 107) were created to test the risk of the technology.&nbsp;<br><br>"The results were in full-blown public circulation" therefore allowing for "extended peer review". The awareness and publicity surrounding the subject, to some extent allows for the public to feel in the loop and informed.&nbsp;<br><br>"Abdicating editorial Omnisence... openly admitting the subjectivity of scientific judgment under conditions of uncertainty" Essentially the openness, and truthful statement about the trial and error involved in this process, may allow the public to gain more trust in those promoting the expertise. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:37:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225566644</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Britain: Weakening Expertise</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225566668</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Prince Charles, whilst being a public figurehead appealed to conservatism and this in some ways started to polarise public opinion. Whilst it didn’t cause angst, it certainly did not reassure the public. He generally appealed to a conservative sense of distrust of new technology.&nbsp;<br>Angst was avoided by not giving the public a choice, however there were no protests so although people were conservative, they didn’t dislike it so much to actually protest in the streets.<br>However this public distrust was enough to change britains understanding of expertise. Committee structures drew on wider spectrum of opinion in advisory processes. This included academics and practitioners, scientists and ethicists, farmers and industrialists. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:37:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225566668</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Germany: Containing the Process</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225566755</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Delay commercialization in favor of continued, supervised scientific experimentation (p.118)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:38:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225566755</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>United States: The Market Speaks  (130-139)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225567115</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How did the naturalization work (p.131)?<br>No documented health risks.<br>Idea that GMOs had been 'certified by science as safe' (Pg.130).<br>Genetic modification seen to be as natural as many other agricultural practices.<br>Focus in US on risk assessment of products produced by GM rather than GM itself.<br> 'It was as much a process of making the world safe for the introduction of GM as making GM safe for introduction to the world.' (pg.131)<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:39:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225567115</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Germany: An Eloquent Silence (139-142)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225568286</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-No public displays, not much media attention <br>-even the shock of the BSE scandal failed to rock the commitment to conducting politics through political parties and the institutions of the state; confidence in statist solutions was reinforced by the long national experience of expert agencies enforcing bright-line regulations by means of technical expertise and attentiveness to the law. (p.143-144)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:44:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225568286</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Prince and his Nature: -To what extent did the idea of ‘sovereignty’ have an influence over the resistance to GMO’s? (p.127).</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225570045</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>UK: For outsiders, the British monarchy represents the nation and sovereignty. Charles resisted GMOs, identified himself as part of the ordinary public and making their concerns his own. Mixed opinions- but </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:51:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225570045</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>-How did the media influence the public’s views on GMO’s? (p.130 &amp; p.139)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225570364</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>UK: Prince Charles presenting his views on GMOs as in line with the<br> - concerns of the average man, a shared concern for the sanctity of nature<br>presented as a farmer himself<br>- mixed public reactions<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-29 11:52:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/225570364</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>US: </title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226078395</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Normalization came through scientists' support of the products' safety. "Rational risk calculations made by experts" created less controversy about GMOs throughout the public (p 99).<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:10:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226078395</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>UK: </title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226078945</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Not normalised and in widespread use, however there is less scaremongering now in media. It wasn’t presented as a choice as such, they just went ahead with it.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:11:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226078945</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the practice of genetic modification come to be normalized across Britain, Germany and the U.S? From pages 96-106.  What procedures and principles were put in place in each country?</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226080485</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:14:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226080485</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>what was the popular anxiety about?</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226082076</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>People were concerned about the unknown of genetic engineering. <br>When the controversy died down, the public were able to understand that genetic engineering of crops was safe and attainable.<br>Views on genetic engineering was normalized.<br>It was seen as a model that science could tame the uncertainties of technological innovation. <br>Scientists rationalized the idea and prospects of GM.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:16:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226082076</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How could scientists prove to the public that genetic modification is safe?P. 97-99</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226194831</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 16:57:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226194831</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Was [Peter] Meyer&#39;s confidence in the safety studies warranted? pg. 106</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226196464</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 16:59:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226196464</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the opposition manifest itself?</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226201793</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 17:08:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226201793</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Germany</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226202860</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Participation in technical decision making (p.103); a new procedural forum in which the public could question the goals and premises of genetic engineering (p.106)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 17:09:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/226202860</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chapter 4: Unsettled Settlements (94 -118)</title>
         <author>aschrader11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/325199039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-01-29 00:23:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/aschrader11/uzo9qwxzk82f/wish/325199039</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
