Middle English vocabulary and word-building by Тетяна Стефанюк https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve Сделано в атмосфере таинственности en-us 2020-10-22 19:56:08 UTC 2020-10-22 20:38:35 UTC hello@padlet.com tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854104485 2020-10-22 20:00:52 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854104485 tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854107924 2020-10-22 20:02:08 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854107924 tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854113302 2020-10-22 20:04:09 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854113302 tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854116415 2020-10-22 20:05:23 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854116415 tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854119600 •In Middle English the Old English word-forming powers were reduced, 
•Still, the two main internal means of developing the vocabulary were affixation and composition.
•Many of the OE prefixes lost their ability to enter into new combinations. For example, the OE prefix for- was only occasionally used in ME, e.g. forcleave (to cut to pieces). The OE prefix with- gave only a few new words in ME. 
•There existed several productive word-building prefixes, for example, a number of ME verbs were formed with the help of prefixes, such as mis-, un-, be-.
]]> 2020-10-22 20:06:32 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854119600 tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854123920 2020-10-22 20:08:12 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854123920 tanyastyles20 https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854130925 2020-10-22 20:10:36 UTC https://padlet.com/tanyastyles20/uyzxpzmnnld5nrve/wish/854130925