https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o Senate members are not elected, but they have the power to reject the laws that are created by members of the House of Commons. Is this anti-democratic? en-us 2017-11-14 18:27:33 UTC 2017-11-17 18:31:28 UTC hello@padlet.com zara_macintosh https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/206907411 booooooooo]]> 2017-11-14 18:59:47 UTC https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/206907411 kassie_williams https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/207361132 No, because if a law makes no sense or is too dangerous, (an example is "execution or torturing is okay") it should be rejected by the members of the Senate. ]]> 2017-11-15 18:24:13 UTC https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/207361132 https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/207364137 This is not anti-democratic because, for example, if the House of Commons makes laws that the Senate don't agree to, they should be able to reject them.]]> 2017-11-15 18:29:09 UTC https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/207364137 alannah_ayoub https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/207370123 No, because if they make a law they a law the parties have no choice but too support.]]> 2017-11-15 18:39:02 UTC https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/207370123 https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/208236311 Yes because the members of the senate are appointed by the Prime Minister so they may not be the smartest or best person to make important decisions regarding the passing of laws.  

]]> 2017-11-17 18:16:11 UTC https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/208236311 https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/208241458 It is anti-democratic because the prime minister can choose who is the senate of are not smart of just weird so they can just let some stupid laws by and the general public couldn't do anything about it.]]> 2017-11-17 18:27:00 UTC https://padlet.com/james_rowan/uwly4b8kvq2o/wish/208241458