<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of CCOT of the US Supreme Court by Madison Davis</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan</link>
      <description>Working with your group you will create a &quot;timeline&quot; of significant court cases. Using the cases you have to choose from in class, research them, add them to the proper category with a summary. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:43:45 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-10-17 14:32:09 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Your boxes should look something like the one below for each court case. </title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293328792</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>Date</li><li>Constitutional issue (posed as a question)</li><li>Decision (answer to question)</li><li>Votes for majority/dissenting opinion</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:43:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293328792</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marbury v. Madison</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293328793</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Date: 1803<br>Questions: Which branch of government is most powerful?<br>Decision: They are all equal as this cases establishes the ability of the Supreme Court to determine the Constitutionality of a law<br>Votes: 4 majority<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:43:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293328793</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities </title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293328795</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>At the end of each column provide an evaluation of what has changed or what has stayed the same over time for the given category. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:43:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293328795</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New York Times v. Sullivan</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293332411</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Janurary 6th, 1964<br>Questions: Did Alabama's libel law unconstitutionally infringe on the First Amendment's freedom of speech and freedom of press protections?<br>Decision: The Court agreed with the New York Times. The Court said it is not enough to show that it is false for the press to be liable for libel. Instead, the target of the statement must show that it was made with knowledge of or reckless disregard for its falsity.<br>Votes: 9 majority, 0 minority<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:48:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293332411</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker vs. Des Moines </title>
         <author>20zstockbower</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293332574</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: February 24, 1969<br>Questions: Why do the students have the right to wear the black armbands?<br>Decision: The Supreme Court thought the students free rights should be protected and they don't shed their <br>Votes: 7 majority, 2 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:48:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293332574</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bethel v. Fraser</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293334757</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: July 7, 1986<br>Question: Can a school limit a students free speech based on sexual innuendos?<br>Decision: A school has the right to suspend a student who has violated the schools code of conduct, even if it invovles a constitutional right, like free speech.<br>Votes: 7 majority 2 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:51:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293334757</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Texas v. Johnson </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293335957</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1989<br>Questions: Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment?<br>Decision: That flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.&nbsp;<br>Votes: 5 majority, 4 minority</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:53:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293335957</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Washington v. Glucksberg </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293340294</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1997<br>Questions: Did Washington's ban on physician assisted-suicide violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by denying competent terminally ill adults the liberty to choose death over life?<br>Decision: They assert a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause which extends to a personal choice by a mentally competent, terminally ill adult to commit physician assisted suicide.<br>Votes: 9 majority</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:58:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293340294</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abington School District v. Schem</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293340453</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: June 17, 1963<br>Question: Did a law in Pennsylvania requiring the bible to be read at the beginning of each school day violate the constitutional right of religious freedom?<br>Decision: The goverment condoning or forcing anyone to read or recite any religous prayers is unconstitutional and violates the first ammenment.<br>Vote: 8 majority, 1 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:58:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293340453</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FCC v. AT&amp;T</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293340522</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Janurary 19, 2011<br>Question: May corporations assert personal privacy interests to prevent the government from releasing documents about them?<br>Decision: The court held that corporations do not have a right of personal privacy that would protect them from the disclosure of public records that have been handed over to federal agencies.<br>Votes: 8 majority, 0 minority<br>Kagan took no part in the decision.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 13:58:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293340522</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Roe v. Wade </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293343819</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Date: 1971<br>Questions: Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?&nbsp;<br>Decision: The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.&nbsp;<br>Votes: 7 majority, 2 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:03:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293343819</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>NASA vs. Nelson </title>
         <author>20zstockbower</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293344205</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: January 19, 2011<br>Questions: Does the government violate a federal contract employee's constitutional right to ask private questions if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility?<br>Decision: No, NASA nor the government have the right to violate employee's right. <br>Vote: 8 majority, 1 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:03:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293344205</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sante Fe School District v. Doe</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293346866</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Jun 19, 2000<br>Question: Does student lead, student initited prayer at football games violate the first ammdment?&nbsp;<br>Decision: The student lead prayer violates the first ammenmment because it is done over a government funded speaker in a government funded school. The prayer should be a private speech not public.<br>Vote: 6 majority 3 minority</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:07:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293346866</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Engle v. Vitale</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293347197</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Apr 3, 1962<br>Question: Does the reading of a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violate the "establishment of religion" clause of the First Amendment?<br>Decision: The state cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if participation is not required and the prayer is not tied to a particular religion.&nbsp;<br>Vote: 6 majority, 1 minority<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:07:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293347197</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schenck v. United States </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293350490</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1919<br>Questions: Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his First Amendment right to freedom of speech?<br>Decision: Articulating for the first time the “clear and present danger test,” Holmes concluded that the First Amendment does not protect speech that approaches creating a clear and present danger of a significant evil that Congress has power to prevent.<br>Votes: 9 majority<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:11:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293350490</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293358630</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Privacy has changed a little since technology has evolved. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-16 14:20:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293358630</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Brown v. Board of Education</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293834204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: May 17, 1954<br>Question: Does the banning of African Americans in certain schools break the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?<br>Decision: The seperation of races in schools is never equal therefore it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.&nbsp;<br>Vote: 9 majority</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:32:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293834204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dred Scott v. Sanford</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293837711</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: March 6, 1857<br>Question: Can a slave imported to a free state be a citizen?<br>Decision: Because Dred Scott came to America as a slave and because he is black he is not a citizen, even if he lives in a state where slavery is illegal. Therefore he has no legal standing to bring this case to the supreme court.<br>Votes: 7 majority, 2 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:38:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293837711</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mapp v. Ohio </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293839773</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1961<br>Questions: Were the confiscated materials protected by the First Amendment?<br>Decision: They declared that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in a state court. <br>Votes: 6 majority, 3 dissenting </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:41:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293839773</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miranda v. Arizona</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293840888</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Jun 13, 1966<br>Question: Does the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect?<br>Decision: The Fifth Amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in police custody. The Miranda laws come from.<br>Votes: 5 majority, 4 minority</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:42:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293840888</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bush vs. Gore</title>
         <author>20zstockbower</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293841013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: December 12, 2000<br>Questions: Do standard less manual recounts violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Constitution?<br>Decision: They agreed that they violated the Equal Protection Clause but, they dissented with respect to the remedy, believing that a constitutional recount could be fashioned<br>Vote: 7 majority, 2 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:42:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293841013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy v. Ferguson </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293841755</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1896<br>Questions: Does the Separate Car Act violate the Fourteenth Amendment?&nbsp;<br>Decision: Segregation did not in itself constitute unlawful discrimination.<br>Votes: 7 majority, 1 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:43:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293841755</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Escobedo v. Illinois </title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293842995</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Jun 22, 1964<br>Question: Did denying Danny Escobedo a lawyer as soon as he arrived for interigation violate his fourth ammendment right to legal counsil?<br>Decision: Denying Escobedo an attorney during an interrigation is unconstitutional. Therefore his confession is inadmissible and cannot be used in his case.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:45:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293842995</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker v. Des Moines </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293844858</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1969<br>Questions: Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the students' freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment?<br>Decision: The Supreme Court held that the armbands represented pure speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it.<br>Votes: 7 majority, 2 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:48:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293844858</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293847272</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1935<br>Questions: Did Congress unconstitutionally delegate legislative power to the President by giving him power to regulate certain industries without also providing guiding standards?<br>Decision: The President cannot be allowed to have unbridled control to make whatever laws he believes to be necessary to achieve a certain goal. <br>Votes: 9 majority<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:51:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293847272</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schenck v. United States</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293847597</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1919<br>Questions: Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his First Amendment right to freedom of speech?<br>Decision: Articulating for the first time the “clear and present danger test,” Holmes concluded that the First Amendment does not protect speech that approaches creating a clear and present danger of a significant evil that Congress has power to prevent.<br>Votes: 9 majority<br>                </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:51:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293847597</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gideon v. Wainwright</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293848578</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: March 18, 1963<br>Question: Does an accused right to an attorney extend to state cases?<br>Decision: The law in Florida which prohibits a person accused of a state crime right to an attorney is unconstituational. It violates the Fourth Ammendment.<br>Vote: 9 majority, unanimous&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:53:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293848578</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nixon v. United States</title>
         <author>20mdavis2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293848923</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: Jan 13, 1993<br>Question: Is Nixon's claim -- that Senate Rule XI violates the Impeachment Trial Clause -- justiciable, i.e., appropriate for judicial resolution?<br>Decision: The clause laid out specific regulations that were to be followed and as long as those guidelines were observed the courts would not rule upon the validity of other Senate procedures regarding impeachments.<br>Vote: Unanimus decision<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:53:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293848923</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. United States</title>
         <author>20zstockbower</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293851724</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: December 14, 1964<br>Questions: Did congress exceed its Commerce Clause powers by depriving places of public accommodation of the right to choose their own customers?<br>Decision: The Court held the government could enjoin the motel from discriminating on the basis of race under the Commerce Clause.<br>Vote: 9 majority&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:57:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293851724</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Korematsu v. United States</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293854034</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: December 18, 1944</div><div>Question: Did the act making Japanese Americans and Japanese immigrants relocate unconstitutional?<br>Decision: The Executive Order 9066 did not violate Japanese Americans  rights because it was made purely with the thoughts of national security in mind.<br>Votes: 6 majority, 3 dissenting</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 13:59:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293854034</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/Continuities </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293868607</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Supreme Court has stayed consistent on making it clear that free speech and expression is all based on the constitution. They have divided the state and schools and what they can go in each.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:21:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293868607</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/Continuities </title>
         <author>20zstockbower</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293870802</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:24:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293870802</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/Continuities</title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293871493</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In supreme court cases involving the total seperation of church and state the court has historically ruled so that the church and the state become more divided. As the years have progressed they havce become more and more liberal, making decisions that completely seperate the church and the state</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:25:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293871493</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/Continuities </title>
         <author>20abova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293874919</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-17 14:29:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20mdavis2/ur9gznuc5tan/wish/293874919</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
