<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>HAPPY #2: Industrial Revolution by Nathan Herchenroeder</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:16:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-12-04 14:14:38 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Nicky - Document I</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212822666</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Audience: </strong></div><div><br></div><div>For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended? </div><div>This document was intended for the Parliament as were many others.  </div><div>What details in the document help you attribute the audience?</div><div>In the document it says that it was a testimony to the parliament</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Point of View: </strong></div><div><br></div><div>Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?</div><div>Abraham Whitehead a clothier. </div><div>Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document byline? If not, can you infer it? </div><div>There is a reference to him in the byline. </div><div>What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?</div><div>The author chooses to talk about excruciating child labor, which shows he is empathetic towards to them.  “I have seen that child coming from its work this winter between 10 and 11 in the evening;” “ it had then to go nearly two miles to the mill,” “ it was only 2 o'clock when the child was called up and went to work;” These are very harsh work terms for a little child, and him choosing to talk about this in Parliament shows he is passionate about this topic. </div><div><br><br></div><div><strong>Purpose</strong></div><div><br></div><div>Why was the document created?</div><div>This document was created to attempt to persuade the Parliament to pass socialist workers-rights laws.</div><div>What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?</div><div>The mere fact that he chose the poor boy’s situation to discuss to Parliament, shows that he is riveted about the workers-rights laws. “I have seen that child coming from its work this winter between 10 and 11 in the evening;” “ it had then to go nearly two miles to the mill,” “ it was only 2 o'clock when the child was called up and went to work;” .</div><div>How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ OR</div><div>How does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?)</div><div>The author’s liberal point of view, could shape the document’s purpose becuase he wants to deliver a moving speech to the Parliament to persuade them. The format is very emotional since when delivering a speech one can show facial expressions that show emotion. </div><div><br></div><div><strong>‘Y’ is The Document Significant?</strong></div><div><br></div><div>How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?</div><div>This document reflects popular arguments because many other people wanted to end child labor and enforce more socialist workers-rights laws, since there was little at the time.</div><div>How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?</div><div>This document reflects change because now-a-days, in westernized countries there are laws banning child labor and are many more workers rights laws, however there still are other developing countries who have the same problem and do not have these laws in place. </div><div>What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)</div><div>The document could not be credible because the person is recounting another person’s story and their point of view could affect how they recount this story. </div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:18:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212822666</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Celine - Doc. L -</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212822765</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>H - 1847</div><ul><li>Main idea: Industrial Revolution; Factories are bad, workers suffering</li><li>Attitude: Suffering </li><li>Evidence: “And the heavy, choking air, Strength's repining, labour's groaning, And the throttling of despair”</li></ul><div>A </div><ul><li>Factory owners/workers boss(es)</li></ul><div>P </div><ul><li>A factory worker’s POV</li><li>Evidence: “Women, children, men were toiling”<br>- “Give us, God, to save our nation, Less of cotton, more of wheat.”<br>- “I see nothing but the machines!”</li><li>Ernest Jones - author of poem</li></ul><div>P </div><ul><li>Expresses factory’s bad conditions and how it affects the town and people (specifically workers)</li><li>Evidence:<br>- “Locked in dungeons close and black”<br>- “Mingled groups of death and life: Fellow-workmen, flesh and iron, Side by side in deadly strife”<br>- “Stood the half-naked infants shivering, With heart-frost amid the heat”</li></ul><div>Y </div><ul><li>Doc. reinforces arguments saying that factories are terrible for people &amp; workers and the surrounding environment.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:18:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212822765</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Document N </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212822908</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Imran<br>&nbsp;</div><div>H: Inspection of cleanliness&nbsp;</div><div>A: The government<br>P: The creator of this document at first had a terrible view of factories but that rapidly changed after going to see how they worked for himself.</div><div>P: The document is for the government and is created so they know if the factory is up to its standards.&nbsp;</div><div>Y: The general public has a terrible view of how factories work.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:19:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212822908</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zac Easum</title>
         <author>zaeasum</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212823005</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Historical Context(Background)</strong></div><div>This document was made during the industrial revolution in 1836. This document was about a person following in their father's footsteps and began working in a mill at a young age. This person was reflecting on their work at the mill and how a lot their associates died at a young age, most before or when they became fifty, also how their work in the mill did not exceed ten hours.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Audience</strong></div><div>Since they are talking about their personal experiences it could be directed toward their personal diary or maybe even intended to be in the newspaper because of them trying to share their opinion. This person talks about how the factory system was a curse, people would die off before the age of fifty and they would work under ten hours.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Point of View</strong></div><div>This seems to be written by a teenager or a person in their early twenties because of how they they say they first joined the mill when they were ten and then say several years later their time did not exceed ten hours. We can immediately know that the author isn’t very happy with their work at the mill because the title refers to the factory system as a curse and how a lot of their associates die.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Purpose</strong></div><div>This document was most likely made in order to rebel against the factory system or just keep as a memory for themselves. We really can’t know what kind of document this is though but it could be a diary entry because of their personal experiences or it could be made to give out an opinion for the newspaper.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>‘Y’ is The Document Significant?</strong></div><div>We normally thought that the change from the feudal manor to working in factories was generally good, yet we still have people complaining. There is also no continuity, from when the person began working in the factory and several years later everything was the same.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:19:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212823005</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Doc Analysis: Happy-Caleb Shao</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212823696</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Document F   Nassau Senior,  Letters on the Factory Act , 1830</strong></div><div> </div><div>The factory work-people in the country districts are the plumpest, best clothed, and healthiest looking persons of the labouring class that I have ever seen.  The girls, especially, are far more good-looking (and good looks are fair evidence of health and spirits) than the daughters of agricultural labourers. The wages earned per family are more than double those of the south….Parliament got up a frightful and an utterly unfounded picture of the ill-treatment of the children.</div><div><br><br><br></div><div><strong>Historical Context:</strong></div><div><br></div><div>Factory system became important and ideas about child labour in factories became more common. They talk about wealth mainly, but also there is a little bit of a defensive mood. </div><div><br></div><div><strong>Audience:</strong></div><div><br></div><div>This is a letter written by a man named “Nassau Senior”, most likely to a close relative, family member, or wife, based on the more relaxed diction.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Point of View:</strong></div><div><br></div><div>Written by a male, because his name ends in “Senior.” Mostly an onlooker or bystander watching these events take place, because he never says “we” but “they.” Someone in support of the new system because he says “Parliament got up a frightful and utterly unfounded picture of the ill-treatment of children.”</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Purpose:</strong></div><div><br></div><div>This letter was written most likely to explain the comforts of being a factory worker to a friend or a family member</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Why was the document significant:</strong></div><div><br></div><div>This shows a different point of view on the lives of people in the work force. There were many different ideas floating around of children being mistreated in the factories, but this man calls these ideas “frightful” and “unfounded”</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:20:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212823696</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>🇮🇳 Ainesh Singh 🇮🇳</title>
         <author>aisingh</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212823884</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Source</strong></div><div><strong>Document K -"The Cotton Mill", John Jones, 1821</strong></div><div> </div><div>        	Now see the Cotton from the town convey'd</div><div>        	To Manchester, that glorious mart of trade:</div><div>        	Hail splendid scene! The Nurse of every art,</div><div>        	That glads the widow's and the orphan's heart!</div><div>        	Thy mills, like gorgeous palaces, arise,</div><div>        	And lift their useful turrets to the skies!</div><div>        	See Kennedy's stupendous structure join'd</div><div>        	To thine M'Connell--friends of human kind!</div><div>        	Whose ready doors for ever wide expand</div><div>        	To give employment to a numerous band,</div><div>        	Murray's behold! That well deserves a name,--</div><div>        	And Lee's and Houldsworth's our attention claim,--</div><div>        	And numerous others, scattered up and down,</div><div>        	The sole supporters of this ample town.</div><div><strong>Historical Background</strong></div><ul><li>This document was maybe written after the initial triggers of jobs increase in the Industrial Revolution.</li><li>One sentence in the document has the word ‘stupendous structures’, which may refer to the newly formed huge factories which accommodated all of the equipment for making clothes.</li><li>The names of people after ‘stupendous structures’ may suggest that the people are working for the mill, and the surroundings around them is portrayed in a positive manner. </li></ul><div><strong>Audience</strong></div><ul><li>This document may be intended for the general public for an insight of people's job in the factory (newspaper).</li><li>As this document was written around the starting of the revolution, a large majority of the people were not aware of the activities happening inside factories.</li></ul><div><strong>Point of View</strong></div><ul><li>The document may be written by a manager of a cotton mill, but the biline suggests another possibility, as the title is followed by a name, and the rest of the document is a poem. This may also indicate that a poet for personal interest wrote this poem.</li></ul><div><strong>Purpose</strong></div><ul><li>This document might have been created to encourage other people to come and join factories.</li><li>This also might have been for the general public to be aware of activities in factories.</li></ul><div><strong>The ‘Y’ of the Document</strong></div><ul><li>Yes, this document is credible as in respect of the time period and the encouragement for joining factories is quite visible because of the happy environment. </li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:21:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212823884</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jesse Pantin</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212824037</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Document H   Peter Gaskell, 1833</strong></div><div> </div><div>        	So long as home education is not found for them, they are to some extent better situated when engaged in light labour, and the labour generally is light which falls to their share.  However, the bringing together numbers of the young of both sexes in factories has been a prolific source of moral delinquency.  The stimulus of a heated atmosphere, the contact of opposite sexes, the example of license upon the animal passions--all have conspired to produce a very early development of sexual appetencies.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Historical Context: </strong></div><div><br></div><div>What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document?</div><div><em>The new growth of factories during the industrial revolution along with child labour during that time period.</em></div><div>What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?</div><div><em>The author of the document was most likely worried about the early development of sexual relationships in a working environment.</em></div><div><br></div><div><strong>Audience: </strong></div><div><br></div><div>For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended?</div><div><em>Workers and the employer of factories who have children working in them.</em></div><div>What details in the document help you attribute the audience?</div><div><em>When the author mentions “factories” and “the young of both sexes” one can infer that he is referring to industrial workers.</em></div><div><br></div><div><strong>Point of View: </strong></div><div><br></div><div>Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?</div><div><em>Peter Gaskell</em></div><div>Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?</div><div><em>He is most likely the owner of a factory, who strongly opposes underage sexual relationships.</em></div><div>What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?</div><div><em>The author mentions “the bringing together numbers of the young of both sexes in factories has been a prolific source of moral delinquency” which probably shows the author is conservative, and looks down on the early development of sexual relations.</em></div><div><br></div><div><strong>Purpose</strong></div><div><br></div><div>Why was the document created?</div><div><em>To inform others of the dangers of having children of opposite sexes working in the same work place.</em></div><div>What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?</div><div><em>The document states; “a prolific source of moral delinquency” as well as “license upon the animal passions” which could be causes of sexual relationships in a workplace, showing the author wants others to realize the problems with workers of the opposite sex in one place.</em></div><div>How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ OR</div><div>How does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?)</div><div><em>The author offers a lot of opinions using words such as “moral delinquency” and “animal passions” which help enhance his argument however; it is still formal like an essay.</em></div><div><br></div><div><strong>‘Y’ is The Document Significant?</strong></div><div><br></div><div>How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?</div><div><em>This document refers to the early development of sexual relationships, which is often a debateable topic today. The ethics of early sex is often debated among parents and adolescents alike, as well as when it is appropriate to have a relationship.</em></div><div>How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?</div><div><em>Before, opposite sexes were often kept separate however; over time they have began to work and learn more together.</em></div><div>What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)</div><div><em>This document is very opinionated which could lessen its credibility, because it does not offer a large number of facts.</em></div><div><em><br></em><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:21:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212824037</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jonathan</title>
         <author>jolove</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212824222</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The document focuses on the life of a boy who went to work on a mill during the industrial revolution. The boy goes into great detail about a sickness with remained nameless. However, the cause of it is known as "mill fever", which is apparently quite common among these types of mills. The sickness comes as a result of the "pestiferous atmosphere produced by so many breathing in a confined place, together with the heat and exhalations of grease and oil".<br><br>The document appears to have been written to raise awareness about the conditions in these mills, and/or share his experiences to the world. The fact that the author is talking about the conditions points towards this idea.<br><br>The document starts with "About a week after I became a mill boy", which suggests that the document was written by the person who experienced the things in this document. Since they work in a mill during the industrial revolution, it is safe to assume that they're lower class, or at very least the very bottom of middle class.<br><br>The document's purpose isn't stated, but as I stated in "Audience", it appears to be trying to get out the idea that conditions in the mill are horrible, and that they have to change.<br><br>The document was written by the person who experienced these hardships, therefore it is a primary source which holds lots of meaning. It represents the working class at this time, and gives the reader good insight to what went on at the start of the industrial revolution.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:21:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212824222</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Victoria Bosoni </title>
         <author>vibosoni</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212824685</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Child Labor:The conditions of the children because of the labor they had to do.The writer uses strong descriptions to describe the horrible conditions.<br>Audience<br>Maybe the parliament<br>They are trying to expose the reality.Probably for a newspaper to educate everyone about the problem.<br>Point of View:<br>C.T Trackah wrote this.<br>No reference to his/her professional, racial, gender, social background.I can infer that they are probably a middle class citizen, because they are speaking in the 3rd person about what they saw not what they are other family members experienced.<br>Purpose:<br>To express the state of the children that are working in the mills. Probably wants people to be aware about the situation.The author`s point of view shapes the writing.Because of the description he applies to to text we are able to conclude that he is against child labor.<br>Y?<br>Most people at the time that were not living through those conditions are not very knowledgable about the condition of the children.The document could impact the general view over child labor.It reflects continuity or change over time’ because, because of the people that spoke out against child labor, today there is laws against it in certain countries. There are limitations to this document because we dont know if the place he is observing( Oxford raw- mills) is a representation of all the children in factories. We would need more evidence.Also if his point of view influence the way he told the story.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:22:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212824685</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Thomas Sisti,document j Letter to Parliament on the Factories Bill</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212825417</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Historical background</strong></div><div>The immediate events for this document to aspire and end up in the hands of the english parliament, in that time there were children working pratically forcedly &nbsp;</div><div><strong>Audience</strong></div><div>This document was directed to the parliament (as it was sent as an anonymous letter to the parliament), the target audience is very clear as he uses “logic” to justify the hard work that children had to endured.</div><div><strong>Point of View</strong></div><div>The person who may have produced this document, may have been a businessman (as he justifies the usage of child labour which was cheaper than adult labour), there is no reference of a&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>	<strong>Purpose</strong></div><div>	This document was most probably created for the purpose to convince parlamentares to vote against any bill and laws against child labour, the excessive “logical thinking of the author&nbsp;</div><div><strong>Y is the document</strong></div><div>This document shape and show us the view of people who thought child labour was a necessary mean and it shows the massive change of mind that occurred in the last century&nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:24:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212825417</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kaitlyn ~ Document &#39;A&#39; </title>
         <author>kacaporossi</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212825486</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the poem,“<strong> </strong>A Factory Girl's Last Day"<strong> </strong>it takes place during the industrial revolution and the factory system where they were desperate for anyone to help work in the factories. This then caused child labor which was a devastating phenomenon that sometimes worked children to their death due to the fatigue and the extreme pain. The byline of the poem, “Michael Sadler, member of&nbsp; Parliament, "A Factory Girl's Last Day", allows us to understand that the document was written towards parliament. This poem was probably written by a little girl in a lower class due to the fact that she was a ‘white slave’ working in the factories. This document was created to raise awareness but also send a message to parliament that there needed to restrictions and laws formed about child labor. This impacts the the reader because it shows the little girl’s point of view of losing her brother due to child labor then taking her own life because of the pain. There are indeed limitations to this document because the little girl could be extending the truth. This document shows significance because over time there has been major improvements and in most countries, child labor has been abolished. Although a lot of improvement has been made since 1832, there are still places that have child labor that need to stop. &nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:24:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212825486</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kristen Campbell</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212825487</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Industrial Revolution and factory systems began and the need for workers of any age or gender skyrocketed. The testimony’s topic was in the environment of Child Labor and the emotions behind the creation of this testimony were most likely sadness and empathy for the young laborers. The title of the testimony says “1816, testimony in Parliament”, therefore we can infer that this testimony was intended for parliament in 1816. We can also see this by Parliament is the only body of people can relieve James’</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:24:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212825487</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zach Schonauer</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212826628</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Docunment M:<br><br>Historical Contexts:<br><br>Industrailism Revlution<br><br>That the factory are having the kids work harder than the adults.<br><br>The emoiton of the texts is fear<br><br>Child Labor was allow during this time<br><br>Audiences:<br><br>This texts is for the goverment of the boss of the factory<br><br>The narritor and the other people is are helpless in the docunment<br><br>Point of View:<br><br>The person who wrote it is a person by the name of&nbsp; <strong>&nbsp;Francis Trollope<br><br>Their POV is of a little boy that work in the factorys(It say it in the title)</strong>&nbsp;<br><br>Purpose:<br><br>The docunment was created for to stope child labor in this time.&nbsp;<br><br>IT was saying it in the texts&nbsp; "hundreds of helpless children, divested of every trace of health, of joyousness, and even of youth! "<br><br>He chose the view of the little boy is to convics the goverment to stop child labor<br><br>Why:<br><br>The doc impact the world over time with child labor. To stop to forces kid to work for them<br><br>It is impacting the arugment. That the kids can have right to stop adult to work for them.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-04 13:26:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nherchenroeder/up2pxf69o1jt/wish/212826628</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
