https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p en-us 2018-11-09 15:22:54 UTC 2018-11-09 15:24:49 UTC hello@padlet.com st20104128 https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607000 1. Findings from this study supported previously literature outlined in the introduction, physical attractiveness formed one of the more pervaisive bases for interpersonal discrimination. 
2.  Even if work is of poor quality, if it is known to be written by someone who is physically attractive then it is likely to be percievd better than it is. 
3. Physical attractiveness not only effects the way in which others react to a person but also the ways in which they react to a persons accomplishments.
4. Men and women are both susceptible to having judgements influenced in this way. ]]> 2018-11-09 15:23:22 UTC https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607000 st20104128 https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607117 1. Physical attractiveness had a greater impact when the essay was of poorer quality than when it was good. 
2. Top rates essays were from the physically attractive writer. Low rates essays were from the unattractive writer. Those rated in the middle were from the control group. 

]]> 2018-11-09 15:23:33 UTC https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607117 st20104128 https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607280 1. Participants: 60 male undergraduates from a psychology course.
2. Ratings for the essay could be given on a 9 point scale from poor to good. 
3. An attractive and unattractive year book photo was used to show control groups the writer of the essay.
4. To determine these photos 6 males were shown 15 photos and asked to rank, the top and bottom photos were used. 
5. Writers of the essay were told essay would be submitted for a competition, partisans were told essays were from an English class. ]]> 2018-11-09 15:23:48 UTC https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607280 st20104128 https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607430 1. All read a short essay and had to evaluate the quality and give impressions of the writer.
2. Half read a well written essay and half read a poorly written essay.
3. Additionally, 1 third thought the writer was physically attractive, 1 third thought the writer was unattractive and 1 third had no knowledge of writers attractiveness. ]]> 2018-11-09 15:24:02 UTC https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607430 st20104128 https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607501 1.Previous literature generally finds that people attribute more positive characteristics and expect better performance from attractive individuals in comparison to those deemed unattractive.

2.Experimental evidence suggests that individuals expect attractive people to have greater potential and the work of more attractive people is viewed more favourably. 

3.This study aimed to determine the effect of psychical attractiveness on evaluation of performance.]]> 2018-11-09 15:24:09 UTC https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607501 st20104128 https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607606 Landy, D. And Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is Talent: Task Evaluation as a Function of the Performers Physical Attractiveness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 299-304.]]> 2018-11-09 15:24:20 UTC https://padlet.com/st20104128/uo9nlp59sl6p/wish/302607606