SFHE27 by https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g Pets and an aging population en-us 2018-01-23 15:36:16 UTC 2019-05-07 12:43:35 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/File.png Ana & Tieli 565687801 https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357575689 Parslow et al. (2005) suggest that there are​ no real benefits in pet keeping, despite the variation due to the type of pets chosen. Unlike Parslow, Staats et al. (2008) and Serpell (1991) who stated that people, especially over 50, benefits from having pets. Furthermore, as mentioned in McNichols (2005), people benefit from pet-keeping in their health in particular, also live a higher quality life.]]> 2019-05-07 12:19:16 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357575689 https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357575700    ]]> 2019-05-07 12:19:18 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357575700 Parslow et al.'s (2005) arguement that pet ownership contains no real benefits though the type of pets kept brings variations. Serpell (1991) have shown that aging population cuases pet ownership's increasing. yuqiliu https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357576587 2019-05-07 12:21:30 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357576587 https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357579352 Parslow's et al. (2005) study showed that having a pet will bring no benefit. Inversely, there is study claimed that people who particularly over 50 believed that pets are beneficial(Staats,Wallace&Anderson,2008). Further more, Sperell (1991) shares a similar perspective that owing a pet can indeed hav benefitt and predict that more people will chose to have a pet due to the increase in ageing population. For McNichols et al,(2005) he suggests that assessment of benefits depend on the definetion of "health".And, he thinks that it is better to focus on "quality of life.]]> 2019-05-07 12:28:08 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357579352 On behalf of Yunfei and Lily mayunfei0121 https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357580037 Parslow et al. (2005) argued that the pet ownership leads to no real benefit. However, McNichols et al. (2005) stated that the assessments of benefits should be based on the definition of "health" and focusing on the "quality of life" framework could be a more comprehensive interpretation.]]> 2019-05-07 12:29:51 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357580037 EVELYN & FANNY https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357582016 McNichols (2005) argues that the benefits will depend on which types of heath in the elder people. McNichols believes that people should focus on their life framework level. However, Parslow (2005) think that feeding a pet is not benefit for their life of elderhood. Parslow shows that the data about though variation in data relying in feeding a pet. In addition, Staats and Wallace and Anderson(2008) collected 50 people opinions. He believes that feeding pets are advantages.
 
]]> 2019-05-07 12:34:27 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357582016 Serpell (1991) suggests that due to the ageing population, there are a great quantity of elderly people who has retired choose to keep pets. These pet ownerships is having a significant effect on beneficial improvement. Besides, It is stated that over 50s believe that pets are beneficial (Staats, Wallace，Anderson, 2008). However, Parslow et al (2005) agrument that there is no real benefit in pet ownership. Though variations in data denpending on animal kept. Furthermore as outlined in McNichols et al(2005) , assessment of benefits depends on definition of “health”. It is thought that focusing on “quality of life” framework will be better and more comprehensive. 2921561490 https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357582431 2019-05-07 12:35:09 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357582431 FANDING & SHAOBA https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357585365 Serpell (1991) states that the negative effect of aging population is being eliminated by pet ownership. Staats, Wallace and Anderson (2008) agree with this as over 50s convinced that pets are advantageous in their lives. Moreover, there is a growing tendency in raising pets (Serpell, 1991). Nevertheless, Parslow et al (2005) doubt the positive effect of pet ownership, no real benefits are reveals in study, regardless of the variables exists in data on animal kept. On top of that, it is indicated the benefits of keeping pets should be evaluated by the definition of “health”, which is better being considered as “quality of life” as it is more comprehensive (McNichols et al, 2005).
 
]]> 2019-05-07 12:41:52 UTC https://padlet.com/nabor_a_riquelme/um3ivrre813g/wish/357585365