This relates to an influential theory called the theory of reasoned action or planned behavior. Which assumes that people behave in a sensible and rational manner and links beliefs to behavior. This best explains Anna's dilemma as her behavior is shaped by three factors: attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. 

Figure 1: Framework of TPB

While Anna’s attitude toward overtime is negative, the subjective norms which are her workplace culture and expectations of her manager, and her perceived lack of control which she fears harming her career future prospects, heavily influenced her final choice. In this case, the external pressure of workplace expectations outweighed her personal values, leading her to act against her attitude.

Personally, I see that attitude-behavior consistency is often strongest when individuals feel empowered and confident to act on their values without fear of negative consequences, the consistency is strengthened and therefore made positively distinct to define one as a person. However, man cannot live in an isolated attitude alone, this highlights now the salient complexity of consistency, where external stimulus, culture, pressure to authority and social expectations have become an extraneous variable to protect the consistent behavior.

To conclude, this is the reality of most Filipino people, could even be universal. The battle of  personal ethics and principle against the demand of the working industry. How about you, will you do what Anna did? 

Reference:

Theory of planned behavior. (n.d.). Change Theories Collection. https://ascnhighered.org/ASCN/change_theories/collection/planned_behavior.html

Let this Self-Assessment Checklist aligned with the rubric guide you in developing your Concept-to-Case Reflection Blog. Total: 25 points (5 points each)

1. Understanding of Concepts

✅ I explained attitude, behavior, and

consistency/inconsistency clearly.

✅ I used my own words and

examples to show understanding.

2. Application to Case Vignette

✅I connected the theories (e.g., Cognitive Dissonance,

Theory of Planned Behavior) to Anna’s situation.

✅ My explanation shows why her attitude

and behavior are consistent or inconsistent.

3. Critical Thinking & Insight

✅ I gave my own interpretation and

reflection (not just repeating theory).

✅ I explained when attitudes and

behaviors align or conflict in real life.

4. Organization & Coherence

✅ My ideas are in logical order (introduction,

explanation, reflection, conclusion).

✅ Each paragraph is clear and connected.

5. Writing Quality

✅ My writing is clear and easy to follow.

✅ I checked for grammar/spelling errors.

✅ If I used sources, I cited them in APA style.