<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Chapter 9 Padlet by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op</link>
      <description>five most important historical events in Chapter 9 </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-05-24 20:38:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-05-24 21:05:48 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Civil Rights Act (1964)</title>
         <author>dors8487</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603782770</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that aimed to address racial discrimination and promote equal treatment for all individuals. While the act did not specifically address bilingual education, it indirectly impacted the field. The act contributed to the development of bilingual education programs as a means to meet the needs of bilingual learners and provide them with equal educational opportunities. It laid the foundation for future legislation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/9R8j1364PJDYzwSE15D4gsmDpSU=/3575x2787/filters:fill(auto,1)/2695533-56aa21603df78cf772ac8431.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2023-05-24 20:40:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603782770</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lau v. Nichols (1974)</title>
         <author>dors8487</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603785911</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Lau v. Nichols was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the rights of non-English-speaking students and their access to equal education. The case originated from a lawsuit filed by Chinese-American students in San Francisco who argued that the school district's failure to provide them with English language instruction violated their civil rights. This decision emphasized the need for schools to provide meaningful access to education for English language learners and paved the way for further developments in bilingual education policy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://userscontent2.emaze.com/images/fd2a63e4-2be0-4ae9-a7ba-b2048d226b4c/d7550ec0-3d55-465b-a27d-2a44799d4c14.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2023-05-24 20:44:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603785911</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bilingual Education Act (1968)</title>
         <author>dors8487</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603788695</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Bilingual Education Act of 1968, also referred to as Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, was a crucial achievement in the advancement of bilingual education within the United States. It allocated federal resources to support bilingual education initiatives, specifically targeting students with limited proficiency in English. The act acknowledged the significance of preserving students' native languages while simultaneously promoting the addition of English language skills.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://assets.sutori.com/user-uploads/image/9c55a09e-f266-4b20-bc6d-ddbf1b6c436b/0e79a4d218c9b68f467fa74a6285cb2c.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2023-05-24 20:48:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603788695</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> Proposition 227 in California (1998)</title>
         <author>dors8487</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603794556</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Proposition 227 was a ballot initiative in California that greatly altered the state's approach to bilingual education. It mandated English immersion programs for most English language learners, limiting the use of bilingual instruction. This event had a deep impact on bilingual education policies in California, and bilingual education became illegal. This sparked a lot of controversy, and the data showed that this did not help with learning English.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.timetoast.com/public/uploads/photos/7128602/download.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2023-05-24 20:58:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603794556</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Esther Martinez Native Languages Preservation Act (2006)</title>
         <author>dors8487</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603798888</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Esther Martinez Native Languages Preservation Act,&nbsp; enacted in 2006, is a U.S. federal law that aims to preserve and revitalize Native American languages. The act recognizes the critical importance of Native languages in maintaining cultural heritage, promoting educational success, and fostering community well-being. It provides funding and support for Native American tribes and organizations to develop and implement language preservation programs. This act works against language loss and promotes immersive language learning environments.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://seminoletribune.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Esther-Martinez-3.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2023-05-24 21:05:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/dors8487/ulcsdpeevih9d5op/wish/2603798888</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
