https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0 Read, analyze and evaluate the article. Give at least one reason to support your critical response to this article en-us 2021-04-12 07:22:27 UTC 2021-04-15 01:12:28 UTC hello@padlet.com 1155159251 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1418996386 The writer have used several statistics showing that seems many employees are browsing materials not related to their working during work time, but this doesn't show that wasting time is good, but only many people are wasting their time.]]> 2021-04-15 00:56:57 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1418996386 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419005500 In the article, author assumed that those employee who use ton of time on browsing different website are collecting information efficiently. However, there are no any data or psychological research can prove this. Also, this assumption can be easily challenged by how if your employee are just doing it for entertainment, how can you guarantee that they can remember and analyze those information and give valuable suggestions. ]]> 2021-04-15 01:00:27 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419005500 1155157573 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419009398 The writer said "Such companies must be way more productive than their less attentive peers". But there is no any examples for "such companies". Also, there is no any evidence to show how the productivity is speeding up for these companies after wasting time.]]> 2021-04-15 01:02:00 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419009398 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419010487 There are not enough evidences to prove the relationship between the online access and the working effectiveness. ]]> 2021-04-15 01:02:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419010487 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419012034 writer said that  "Employees tend to spend more time doing work-related Internet tasks at home than non-work related Internet tasks at the office," and use the statistics as the evidence. The statistics cannot be the reason of that sentence. It is because the writer doesn't talk about how many hours used in personal works and work-related Internet tasks in office or the works cannot let them finish in office hours.]]> 2021-04-15 01:03:02 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419012034 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419021208 The writer assumed that non-work-related activities like googling or online shopping are unproductive. But the writer disagree with this with the reason that workers need some distraction during working hours to keep them productive. ]]> 2021-04-15 01:05:46 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419021208 leungchunhong9876 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419031418 The writer mentioned that employers spend nearly $760 billion a year paying employees to goof off on the Web.However, the writer also mentioned that employees have always engaged in certain types of wide-net information-gathering activities that don't directly feed the bottom line .]]> 2021-04-15 01:09:46 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419031418 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419033075 The writer seems assumed that all the money paid by the employers are all waste because the writer thinks that every employee is not focusing on work.(Para3) However, not every employee goof off to Web. Some of them are really hardworking.]]> 2021-04-15 01:10:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419033075 https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419034454 Employers spend around $760 billion paying employees to have Web surfing a year so wasting time costs a lot.]]> 2021-04-15 01:10:59 UTC https://padlet.com/mattkfung/ukx6v6egqjw6jop0/wish/1419034454