<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Lasers revision  by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-04-30 14:48:19 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-05-27 10:13:54 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Past papers</title>
         <author>mattyj632</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw/wish/3431802213</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>For question 1d on the 2022 ALQ exam paper, why do the populations in N1 and N2 both increase simultaneously for a homogeneously broadened medium? Surely this would not be possible for a fixed number of atoms?&nbsp;</strong></p><p><br/></p><p><em>I think the solution for this question is incorrect: N1 should show a dip on resonance, and N2 should show a peak such that N1+N2=constant.</em></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-30 14:49:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw/wish/3431802213</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Workshop 3 Question c)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw/wish/3928725571</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I dont really understand the concept of image holes from L14. According to the lectures, image holes do not contribute to lasing, but the answer to question c, I believe, includes the image holes in the number of holes that can lase simultaneously. What is the correct answer, and in an exam what should we do?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads-usc1.storage.googleapis.com/5705386621/03e3335f4ddd098896baf0b5299c58bb/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2026-05-25 20:27:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw/wish/3928725571</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Typo in equation (23)</title>
         <author>mattyj632</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw/wish/3931340344</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There was a typo (extra factor of \pi on the denominator inside the bracket) in equation (23) (Lecture 3: ratio of inhomogeneous and homogeneous lineshapes). The numerical result (0.68 \Delta \omega_I/\Gamma_H) and the graphs, text etc are all correct. The correct equation is shown here. I have updated the complete notes file AND the notes file for lecture 3 on Ultra. Apologies and thanks to Ethan for finding this. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads-usc1.storage.googleapis.com/1180632690/ec76b06126f7ed8775557f43695d9993/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2026-05-27 09:40:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mattyj632/ufc1jwxyybbgskvw/wish/3931340344</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
