At least 2 arguments each side.

AI is still not smart as human.AI just a thing that people make and AI must only help people instead of making trouble.For example, a computer will need many complex calculate to figure this out.AI can do it just like a humman too.

The makers of AI are aware of the possible dangers of AI will not threaten us.AI can't attack humman.They should be programmed.

AI is developing humman world.We shouldn't use AI in school.For instance,in China they use a headcupboard to see what do their children do in the class.Parent can open their phone and just click on the app so they can see it too.Students don't have any private.The headcupboard maybe can hurts studens ear and cause pain.

AI is attacking people.In the near future,AI might be use to control military weapon system.Enventually,these AI system could become self-aware.They could decide to attack and kill millions of peple.

• Environmental Sustainability

  • Argument: Renewable energy sources, like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, have minimal environmental impact compared to fossil fuels.

  • Evidence: According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), renewable energy systems emit far fewer greenhouse gases and pollutants, helping reduce climate change and environmental degradation.

• Economic Benefits and Job Creation

  • Argument: Investing in renewable energy can stimulate economic growth and create new job opportunities.

  • Evidence: A report by the World Economic Forum shows that the renewable energy sector already employs millions of people worldwide, with jobs in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance of renewable energy systems.

• Energy Security and Independence

  • Argument: Renewable energy can reduce dependency on imported fossil fuels, improving national energy security.

  • Evidence: Countries like Denmark and Germany have significantly increased their reliance on wind and solar energy, reducing their dependence on foreign energy sources and enhancing energy stability.

    Negative: Governments Should Not Focus Solely on Developing Renewable Energy Sources

  • High Initial Costs

    • Argument: The initial investment required to develop renewable energy infrastructure is often very high.

    • Evidence: According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the cost of setting up renewable energy plants, particularly offshore wind or solar farms, can be prohibitive without substantial government subsidies.

  • Reliability and Intermittency Issues

    • Argument: Renewable energy sources, like solar and wind, are intermittent and may not provide a reliable energy supply all the time.

    • Evidence: Studies show that energy generation from solar and wind is inconsistent, with energy output fluctuating depending on weather conditions. This can lead to power shortages without sufficient storage or backup systems.

  • Impact on Other Energy Sectors

    • Argument: A sole focus on renewable energy could harm established energy sectors, particularly fossil fuel industries.

    • Evidence: A study by the Heritage Foundation indicates that shifting too quickly from fossil fuels to renewables can disrupt economies that rely heavily on coal, oil, and gas, leading to job losses and social instability.

Affirmative:

1. It protects the environment.

• Evidence: If we use more non-renewable energy, more CO2 will be released into the atmosphere, which will cause pollution, global warming, climate change, etc...

  However, if we use more renewable energy, less CO2 will be released into the atmosphere.

2. It would save money in the future.

• Evidence: For example, bicycles in the 1810s used to be expensive only very rich families had enough money to buy only one bicycle. But, as time went on, bicycles became cheaper, with a cost of 2 million VND per bicycle, for reference, that's cheaper than our school's fee per month (Not including extra classes, of course)

Negative:

1. Other problems are more important.

• Evidence: Why should we use our money to make renewable sources when we could use that money to help developing countries like Vietnam or countries that are at war like Israel and Syria, the people there have been poor since the start of the war, and many people starved to death, children may have lost their parents because of the war, so use the money to help them.

2. Not always reliable.

• Evidence: Renewable sources only work with, for example, the sun and the wind, solar panels and wind turbines, but what if the sun got covered by volcanic ash or the wind stopped blowing, renewable sources only work in a limited number of time. However, non-renewable sources work for an unlimited time. The sun got covered? Wind stop blowing? Underground power cables fix that problem.