https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo Once you have established a working thesis, it’s time to think about how you’ll organize your argument. While it’s important to note that you should continue in your quest for resources and support throughout this process, even as you locate source material, you can begin to think about how you plan to bring your ideas and your sources together into a clear, organized manner. As is the case with all types of writing, there is no one right way to organize or structure an argument. However, there are some basic structures and formats that can help you get an idea of how you want to organize your work and, at the very least, provide you with a baseline structure for your argument. en-us 2021-11-30 10:15:30 UTC 2021-11-30 10:41:25 UTC hello@padlet.com poulomidas https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920040045 2021-11-30 10:20:00 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920040045 poulomidas https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920041472 2021-11-30 10:21:01 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920041472 poulomidas https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920050967 2021-11-30 10:27:29 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920050967 shaifalisingh_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920051877 1. Ethos, Pathos, Logos to convince the audience
2. Ethos (thorough research for credibility, Pathos (appeal to the audience through your arguments), Logos (Logical arguments and conclusions to convince the audience)
3. Presenting the claim, evidence, and conclusion for each argument that is introduced. Example: Canagarajah talking about inference, correlationist and negotiation models]]> 2021-11-30 10:28:07 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920051877 sarandeepkhurana_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920052380 1. Introduction.
2. Acknowledging the other side.
3. Present your side.
4. Bring the two sides together.
5.  Remind your audience of the balanced perspective

When your audience is a really difficult one in the sense that you know your audience isn’t going to completely agree with your side of the issue, it can be a good idea to try to find a middle ground. The Rogerian argument finds that middle ground.]]> 2021-11-30 10:28:28 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920052380 shivangishankerk_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920052629 This is used to find a common ground with the audience. Here, immediately after introducing one's own opinion/stand on an issue, the opposing view is also acknowledged. Then, the author elaborates on their own opinion. The essay or write-up ends in a balanced view where the author tries to convince the opposition about why at least some aspects of the argument stated is worth accepting. ]]> 2021-11-30 10:28:39 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920052629 shreyad_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920054222 3) This style is typically visible in academic essays where the readers are also in demand of proper sources backing the argument. ]]> 2021-11-30 10:29:48 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920054222 shivangishankerk_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920055875 Primary purpose of the Aristotelian argument is to persuade or convince the audience towards your side. ]]> 2021-11-30 10:30:56 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920055875 sarandeepkhurana_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920056285 1. Claims
2. Grounds
3. Warrants
4. Backing
5. Qualifier
6. Rebuttal

This type of argument works well when there are no clear truths or absolute solutions to a problem. Toulmin arguments take into account the complex nature of most situations.]]> 2021-11-30 10:31:13 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920056285 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920056385 This framework is great for constructing, analysing and approaching an argument
1) Claim
2) Grounds 
3) Warrant
4) Backing 
5) Qualifier
6) Rebuttal]]> 2021-11-30 10:31:17 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920056385 aindrilasinha_yif22 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920059333 1. Components : 
a. The two opposing arguments.
b. The specific situations where they are valid.
c. Feedback from audience. 
d. Editing. 

2.  What follows what?
a. My argument.
b. The opposing argument.
c.  Evidence that the opposing argument is also valid during certain circumstances.
d. Evidence for my argument. 
e. Conclusion. 
f. Feedback
g. Editing.

3. Arguments about controversial topics.]]> 2021-11-30 10:33:20 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920059333 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920062071 1) Claim- Farm Laws are beneficial for economic progress of farming community
2) Grounds - private participation, fair market value
3) Warrant - data backed?
4) Backing  - other data of related or allied industry
5) Qualifier- issues that may cause things to backfire or not be accepted by larger community
6) Rebuttal- farmers protest and claims]]> 2021-11-30 10:35:00 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920062071 https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920064185 This form of persuasive argumentation allows the author and reader to find a middle ground by analysing the context through the lens of reader's perspective before introducing the claims ]]> 2021-11-30 10:36:23 UTC https://padlet.com/poulomidas/udmatvaf7rh51exo/wish/1920064185