<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of Between session 4 and 5. CBT is smoke and mirrors, its all about the therapeutic relationship, isn&#39;t it? by Rob</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0</link>
      <description>Don&#39;t non-specifics account for effectiveness?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-02-01 12:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-02-17 15:42:24 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>5. SP/SR</title>
         <author>rjkidney2_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803776</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Using either a Kolb cycle or a CBT formulation, use this padlet link to track your responses:</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet.com/r_j_kidney2/59ptyfhpsaxv" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 12:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803776</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4. Consider this....</title>
         <author>rjkidney2_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803777</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Critical consideration of research</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/98573578/7ac5a45c11826b6ee745b3632a7a02f2bdd61b82/a403bfafacc913caf44729dfa38d9ad6.pptx" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 12:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803777</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2. Before we start...</title>
         <author>rjkidney2_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803778</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Take a moment to notice your expectations of what the paper will say. Do you have any ideas on effectiveness of different therapies before you start? Why do you think a range of treatment approaches tend to be offered in CAMHS services, and how are these selected? What is your thinking on the role of specific therapy skills/techniques over engagement skills alone? What other factors do you think may effect outcomes for treatment?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 12:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803778</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>rjkidney2_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803779</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>3. Read this paper!</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/98573578/bf304274b62cd83153da06fabc864ec105ada2e9/9cd0108851203af4f3fa704aa0e4030b.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 12:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803779</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1. Effectiveness of CBT for depression in children</title>
         <author>rjkidney2_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803780</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>This padlet looks at your thoughts regarding the use of CBT, and what the evidence tells us. <br><br>Non-specific factors are often cited as accounting for most of the change effects in therapy. Surely this would mean all therapies come out with the same effectiveness more or less? <br><br>What happens when we look at the evidence for CBT? Is it over-hyped or over-criticised? Attached is a paper looking at the evidence base for psychological treatment for depression in children.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 12:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rjkidney2_1/uc7sqne64tp0/wish/150803780</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
