<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Next M&amp;S by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:17:14 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-10-21 11:44:19 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642947757</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads-usc1.storage.googleapis.com/4597966369/104275a389ba2060ca3111448e01afe2/Next_vs_M_S_2.xlsx" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:23:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642947757</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Next and M&amp;S gearing ratio</title>
         <author>riazh5</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642947944</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The chart shows that Next's gearing ratio has risen sharply from around 100% in 2025 to nearly 500% in 2020, indicating a high rate of rise in debt relative to equity. In contrast, M&amp;S's gearing ratio has been considerably more stable, rising briefly around 2021 before falling. The implication is that while Next has been following a more aggressive, debt-financed growth policy that is perhaps increasing both risk and potential return, M&amp;S has been following a more cautious approach with greater financial stability.</p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads-usc1.storage.googleapis.com/4597628632/fa4aa8b567630e3d1a8e2a0b4c58af05/Screenshot_2025_10_21_121922.png" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:23:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642947944</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Profitability Ratio Analysis </title>
         <author>furbertb</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642949745</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Profitability Ratio Analysis</p><p>From the profitability ratio analysis we can conclude that Next PLC is efficiently using its capital to generate profits. This can be depicted from the data as from 2020- 2025 Next PLC is averaging 35.76% over the last 5 years. This percentage is well above the average “benchmark”. This could be as a result of strong operational performance and good management. Next PLC would definitely be more attractive to potential new investors as they prefer to invest in companies with consistently higher ROCE.&nbsp;</p><p>However Marks and Spencer is not using its capital efficiently to generate profits. The cause is low profits ( not enough profits made to cover all expenses). This can be due to poor management efficiency. Ultimately discouraging potential investors, as their capital can be used more efficiently elsewhere.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:24:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642949745</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Names: Eetu ,Haarith, Bakari, Simran </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642950691</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:25:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642950691</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Efficiency ratios</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642951847</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the efficiency ratios we notice that M&amp;S is more efficient than Next Plc because of its ability to sell the goods faster (average of 34 days), to collect money from customers in 4 days and ask its suppliers more time to pay their payables, compared to Next Plc.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:26:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642951847</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Capital structure</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642962312</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Next Plc gearing ratio shows us the increasing debt of the company over time, and this means that even the financial risk has increased a lot because of the greater dependency on borrowed funds. Profitability of the company is decreasing because of the increasing interest it has to pay</p><p>Meanwhile, Mark and Spencer’s debt didn't increase much but its ability to pay its investors has decreased</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:34:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642962312</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Liquidity Ratio Analysis </title>
         <author>furbertb</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642968239</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p> Liquidity Ratio&nbsp;</p><p>From the liquidity ratio analysis we can conclude that Next PLC has a stronger ability to meet short term obligations than Marks and Spencer. This can be as a result of Next PLC having more assets. Therefore Next will most definitely operate for the foreseeable future and long term. However Marks &amp; Spencer’s ability to meet short term obligations is much lower. Therefore if they continue like this they may be at risk of liquidation.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-10-21 11:38:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/riazh5/ub7v4wubhhmwcz2c/wish/3642968239</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
