<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Black Sunday Constructed Response Sample  by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws</link>
      <description>What are two things that people did to fix the plains after Black Sunday? </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-01-13 12:53:07 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-01-13 14:57:22 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sample Response </title>
         <author>edefifthgrade201</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147022027</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>People did some things to help the plains after they destroyed them and cause the Black Sunday event.  First, they planted trees and prairie grasses.  I know this because it says on page 9 under the subheading Hardships and Hope, "trees and prairie grasses were planted".  Additionally, farmers learned new ways to farm. I know this because it says on page 9, "new ways of farming protected the land." Those are two things people did to fix the plains after Black Sunday.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 12:54:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147022027</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 2: Angel, Marco, Bruno</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147048226</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This is a weak response because it does not have many details from the article. Although, it had some evidence from the text. -Marco<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This example of a response is weak because not many examples from the text are in this response. This make the response not so strong.-Bruno<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This is a weak response because it doesn't explain the text evidence well. It just states were the evidence is but does not explain it.- Angel&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:32:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147048226</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 3:Dylan S., Dario, Sulma</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147048315</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We think the response is ok&nbsp; because the author wrote most the details that can support the response. Although the author could have added more details and the author could have added an explanation to the evidence, the introduction and conclusion were pretty good.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:33:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147048315</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>group 6 - Derick, Edgardo, and Vianey</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147048757</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This response is OK because it used details from the article. It also, restated the question. The response could have been more strong if they used examples. Another good thing about the response is that the conclusion restated the question also</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:34:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147048757</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 5: Ashlee, Jayden, Dylan M.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147049055</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;The response is ok because the sentences are not very long. Also, the response do not have many details. On the other hand, it does give 2 details from the text. The response does have a conclusion which leaves me with no questions. The response could have used more stronger vocabulary words. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:35:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147049055</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 1- Camilo, Jade, Estefania</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147049094</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This response can use more explanations like an analysis. The response should use stronger phrases when referring to the article. It should use "according to" and "in the article it states." Also, we think that the conclusion should be more specific.  This response is weak.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:35:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147049094</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 7</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147049530</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This response is an "okay" response. I think the writer of this response could add stronger vocabulary (domain specific vocabulary even) and much better details. Though this response has text evidence, it could be much better. In the first text evidence, they only say "trees and prairie grasses were planted." They could explain much more about their text evidence.<br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:36:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147049530</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147050136</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It is a strong response because it cites evidence from the text. Also, it includes some details answering what the settlers did to fix the plains after Black Sunday. Lastly, they restated in the end and beginning. On the other hand the writer could added some more details and stronger sentences to explain their answer.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-13 14:37:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/edefifthgrade201/uao9regon3ws/wish/147050136</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
