<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Shapiro, J.S., 2021. The environmental bias of trade policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2), pp.831-886.https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa042 by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/wangyirong1230/uad8hk542iy3pwu</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-02-21 09:20:29 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-02-21 11:24:12 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>2.21</title>
         <author>wangyirong1230</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wangyirong1230/uad8hk542iy3pwu/wish/2890689934</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This article mainly discusses the issue of inequality in trade policy. The author not only analyses the reasons why trade policies of different countries have an impact on the environment, but also conducts in-depth research on the ways in which trade policies affect the environment. This leads to the conclusion that the environmental bias of trade policy will have an important impact on the environment. These environmental biases are mainly reflected in the tariffs of different countries. Industries with serious pollution face lower tariff barriers. At the same time, countries also ignore the issue of carbon dioxide emissions when formulating trade policies. Therefore, these findings have positive significance for countries to improve their trade policies and provide good reference for countries to formulate reasonable trade policies. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of environmental considerations in trade agreements, with some trade agreements benefiting industries with lower environmental standards, leading to adverse ecological consequences. Therefore, the government should take the perspective of environmental factors as the main starting point and integrate various factors to formulate more reasonable trade policies.</p><p>Questions</p><p>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; How can trade policies be adjusted to support environmental goals without harming economic growth?</p><p>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What about the impact of clean/dirty trade policies?</p><p>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What are the potential benefits of reducing import tariffs on clean industries?</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2319362772/5555315d571dc0a66c2aacc196493e8b/Seminar_1__Global_Environmental_Inequality_Policy_Group_a_.docx" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-21 09:22:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wangyirong1230/uad8hk542iy3pwu/wish/2890689934</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Seminar 1, Global Gender Inequality Policy Group (b)</title>
         <author>qiuqiukeaiaiai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wangyirong1230/uad8hk542iy3pwu/wish/2890811301</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2341648320/eca91ed05bfffc1d65eed8b5ff5cb281/padlet_questions_with_answers_.docx" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-21 11:24:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wangyirong1230/uad8hk542iy3pwu/wish/2890811301</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
