-The URL have .gov.

-Their post, the last review from mid-early 2020 onward.

-They have a clear source of information for each post.

-They have headquartered (in the US)

-Their parent company is the US Department of Health and Human Services

 B is not credible:

-All the post of them are since June 1, 2002.

-They look like just have one author is Sean D. Pitman M.D.

-The web is not secure.

Case 4:
In web 1, all of the news have date and the arthur name on it and most of it just before 1-2 years, while web 2 I just can see only one writer create all of the fact and they didn’t add the date.

 -I have check the infomation about some authur in both web site, like I has said web 2 I can only see only 1 writer,not sure everyone can edit it but web 1 the authur are all have knowledge about the topic they choose , their profile prove it.

 -Website 1 have .org stand behide its URL it mean they are certified news organization from US they even let us atleast know the name of the publiser, web 2 didn’t even let us know who write the news.

 -Web 2 have so many news from 6 years ago and no update.

-Overall, I think website 1 will be more accurate and safter to use rather than web 2.