<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Amazon, Monopoly? by Jacob Riggs</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jriggs19/u8bsjlp6cfmx</link>
      <description>Lets Go!</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-10-10 16:42:29 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-10-10 16:58:35 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is it or is it not a Monopoly</title>
         <author>jriggs19</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jriggs19/u8bsjlp6cfmx/wish/195705820</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>10/10/17<br>In the First article it stated facts from both sides of the issue, if Amazon was or was not a Monopoly. The second article is from Business Insider. They stated that Amazon is not a monopoly yet. They stated that not only is it not a monopoly, but it is not even close to being one. Over the past 12 months, Amazon has accumulated $150 billion in sales. For a comparison,&nbsp; U.S. food service and retail sales racked in over $5.5 trillion.<br><br><br><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-stock-price-not-a-monopoly-2017-8">http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-stock-price-not-a-monopoly-2017-8</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f9/Monopoly_pack_logo.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-10 16:45:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jriggs19/u8bsjlp6cfmx/wish/195705820</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
