2) The chart illustrates the distribution of people born in Australia and those born abroad across urban, rural, and town areas between 1995 and 2010.

3) The bar chart illustrates the proportion of individuals in the UK who consumed five daily servings of fruits and vegetables from 2001 to 2008.

4) The line graph illustrates the number of international tourists who visited three different regions in a European country between 1987 and 2007.

5) The graph illustrates how many people participated in a wildlife survey in Britain over the period from 2001 to 2009.

6) The chart illustrates the fluctuations in banana prices across four countries over a ten-year span, from 1994 to 2004.

7) The bar chart illustrates employment patterns in agriculture, services, and industry sectors in three countries in 1990 and presents projections for 2030.

8) The line graph illustrates the number of students from the US, the UK, and Australia who pursued higher education abroad between 2002 and 2007.

9) The chart illustrates trends in the unemployment rate alongside the number of people emigrating from Ireland from 1988 to 2008.

10) The line graph illustrates the output of three types of forest-related products—timber, pulp, and paper—in a European country between 1980 and 2000.

11) The pie charts illustrate how the energy production mix changed in a particular country between 1983 and 2003.

12) The charts illustrate the shift in the energy generation structure by source in a country between 1985 and 2003.

+ The bar graph demonstrates the percentage of individuals who consumed five servings of fruit and vegetables daily in the UK from 2001 to 2008.

+ The chart below illustrates how many abroad visitors to three distince areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.

+ The chart below demostrates how many people participated in a wildlife study in Britain between 2001 and 2009.

+ The chart below shows the bananas cost in four distinct countries between 1994 and 2004

3) The bar charts demonstrates the proportion of individuals in the UK consuming five daily servings of fruits and vegetables between 2001 and 2008

4) The following graph presents data on international tourists visiting three regions in a European country from 1987 to 2007

5) The graph displays how many individuals participated in a wildlife survey in Britain from 2001 to 2009

6) The graph provides data on banana prices in four different countries over the period 1994 to 2004

7) The bar graph compares employment distribution across agriculture, industry, and services in three countries in 1990 and forecasts for 2030

8) The chart presents the unemployment trends and the emigration figures in Ireland between 1988 and 2008

9) The graph illustrates the output of timber, pulp, and paper in a European country from 1980 to 2000

10) The pie charts depict how the shares of energy production sources in a country changed between 1983 and 2003

11) The charts below compare the proportions of energy generated from various sources in a country in 1985 and 2003

Specifically, some charts show the percentage of people born in and outside Australia living in different areas between 1995 and 2010, as well as the proportion of UK citizens eating five portions of fruits and vegetables per day from 2001 to 2008. Other graphs highlight the number of overseas visitors to three distinct areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 and the participation of people in a wildlife survey in Britain from 2001 to 2009.

Further data displays include information about banana prices in four countries from 1994 to 2004 and employment distributions across agriculture, services, and industries in three nations in 1980, with projections for 2020. Additionally, one graph illustrates the number of students from the US, UK, and Australia studying abroad from 2002 to 2007, while another shows both the unemployment rate and the number of people emigrating from Ireland between 1988 and 2008.

There is also data on the production of timber, pulp, and paper in a European country from 1980 to 2000, as well as pie charts presenting changes in energy production methods between 1983 and 2003. Lastly, a chart compares the proportion of energy generated from different sources in 1985 and 2003.

Specifically, some charts show the percentage of people born in and outside Australia living in different areas between 1995 and 2010, as well as the proportion of UK citizens eating five portions of fruits and vegetables per day from 2001 to 2008. Other graphs highlight the number of overseas visitors to three distinct areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 and the participation of people in a wildlife survey in Britain from 2001 to 2009.

Further data displays include information about banana prices in four countries from 1994 to 2004 and employment distributions across agriculture, services, and industries in three nations in 1980, with projections for 2020. Additionally, one graph illustrates the number of students from the US, UK, and Australia studying abroad from 2002 to 2007, while another shows both the unemployment rate and the number of people emigrating from Ireland between 1988 and 2008.

There is also data on the production of timber, pulp, and paper in a European country from 1980 to 2000, as well as pie charts presenting changes in energy production methods between 1983 and 2003. Lastly, a chart compares the proportion of energy generated from different sources in 1985 and 2003.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of individuals in the UK who consumed five portions of fruits and vegetables daily from 2001 to 2008.

3.

The graph provides data on the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.

4.

The chart shows the number of people who participated in a wildlife survey in Britain over the period from 2001 to 2009

6.

The bar chart presents the employment distribution in agriculture, services, and industry sectors across three countries in 1990 and the projected figures for 2030.

5.

The graph gives information about the banana prices in four different countries between 1994 and 2004.

7.

The graph illustrates the number of students from the US, UK, and Australia studying at foreign universities between 2002 and 2007

8.

The chart depicts the unemployment rate and the number of people emigrating from Ireland over a 20-year span from 1988 to 2008.

9.

The graph shows the production levels of timber, pulp, and paper—three major forest products—in a European country from 1980 to 2000

10.

The pie charts display changes in the proportion of energy production in a country between 1983 and 2003.

11.

The charts illustrate how the sources of energy production in a country changed between 1985 and 2003.

.

.

1. The chart illustrates the proportion of individuals born in Australia and those born abroad living in urban, rural, and town areas between 1995 and 2010.

2. The bar graph presents the percentage of people in the UK who consumed five servings of fruits and vegetables daily between 2001 and 2008.

3. The graph displays the number of international tourists visiting three distinct regions in a European nation from 1987 to 2007.

4. The graph illustrates how many individuals participated in a wildlife survey in Britain over the period from 2001 to 2009.

5. The chart provides data on banana prices in four different countries over the span of 1994 to 2004.

6. The bar chart compares employment distribution across agriculture, industry, and services sectors in three countries in 1990, with projections for 2030.

7. The graph illustrates the number of university students from the US, the UK, and Australia studying abroad between 2002 and 2007.

8. The chart displays trends in Ireland’s unemployment rate alongside figures for emigration from 1988 to 2008.

9. The graph shows the production volumes of timber, pulp, and paper—three key forest products—in a European country from 1980 to 2000.

10. The pie charts depict how the share of different energy sources in a country changed between 1983 and 2003.

11. The charts illustrate the shifts in the proportion of energy generated from various resources in a country in the years 1985 and 2003.

=> Thêm mấy từ in đậm vào bài nó smooth hơn nhé em

In detail, Australia's numbers surged from 2004 to 2006, hitting a high of [specific number if available] before declining in 2007. Spain's figures climbed gradually, whereas New Zealand and the USA varied within a narrow range. France's emigration levels leveled off, showing negligible change throughout the years.

By comparison, Australia and Spain marked the most dramatic growth, while the other destinations remained comparatively unchanged.

Overall, Luxembourg reached a peak in both years, while Cambodia remained stable with no change. Most countries saw significant variations, though trends differed.

In detail, Luxembourg's figure increased dramatically from 548 to 728, hitting a high by 2000. Similarly, Brazil and Jordan experienced surges, with Jordan's numbers jumping from 68 to 157. Conversely, the Bahamas and Chile declined slightly, while Romania saw a marginal drop. New Zealand rose gradually, whereas Cambodia's data leveled off at just 1 vehicle per 1,000 people.

By comparison, Brazil and Jordan marked the most dramatic growth, while Cambodia showed negligible change throughout the decade.

However, the figures which were seen in the chart of the emigration of British to Spain and NZ fall => fell steadily from 32000 to 28000 and from 25000 to 20000, respectively, over the period. It is important to note that British immigrants in NZ reached parity with those in the US at both the beginning and the end of the period.

Ultimately, France had => saw the dramatic change in the British emigrants. Approximately

25,000 Britain=> British who settled in France in 2004 and this figure had the same level with the beginning figure of the USA and NZ . After which => ,after which it had => witnessed a jump and hit the high of 33,000, an equal number with the figure of Spain in 2005. At the end of the period, the figure had => underwent a sharp decline to 18,000. This figure had the same height => data with the USA in 2005 and lesser than the number of Spain immigrants in 2005 approximately twice as much as.

50,000 in 2006, which was by far the largest figure on the whole chart. It fell considerably, ending the period at 42,000. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, were seen in the figure for the latter, hovering around the 20,000 mark throughout.

Meanwhile, British emigrants to Spain and New Zealand both decreased steadily from 32,000 to 28,000 and from 25,000 to 20,000 over the period. It is important to note that British immigrants in New Zealand reached parity with those in the US at both the beginning and the end of the period.

Turning finally to France, this country saw the most significant change.

Approximately 25,000 English people migrated to France in 2004, which matched the figures for New Zealand and the US, as seen above. This number witnessed a subsequent significant rise to a high of 33,000 and a final sharp decrease to 18,000 in the last year of the period.

-Overall , Germany had a significant rise of absence which make it the dominance of the chart .The percentage of French people off from work has some decreased followed by an increasing from Swedish . It also can be seen that both UK and Germany share similar fluctuation at 2%

Overall, the number of labbers => laborers were absent from work due to illness in N (thì như thế nào???), S witnessed an upward trend. Additionally, the figures for U and G maintained => remained virtually unchanged over the whole period.

Overall, the number of laborers were absent from work due to illness in Neverlands (thì sao nhỉ??? trend đâu??), Sweden witnessed an upward trend, while the figure for France experienced a downward trend. Additionally, the figures for the UK and Germany maintained => remained virtually unchanged over the whole period.

(Mất tiêu câu topic sentence ròi) Looking first at ..., the proportion of laborers taking leaving from work due to illness in the Netherlands witnessed a sharp increase from roughly 47% to 56% between 1991 and 1992, and then it surpassed the figure for France to become the leading feature => rate. After that, it plunged to a low of 42% in 1996, followed by a significant rise to 53% in the last year of the whole chart. It is noticeable that the figures for the Netherlands and France underwent similar changes in the first 9-year period (thiệt là giống trend hem??? Chỗ này mình nên so sánh Netherlands và Sweden do nó có xu hướng tăng nha em, sau đó mới tới France). A slight rise was witnessed in the number of employees off from work in France, from roughly 50% in 1991 to 51% in 1992,  after which it dropped to 41% in 1993, then continued to fall to a lesser extent to just under 32%, and a final fall at a consistent rate in the end of the period. The figure for Sweden experienced a fluctuation in the range from 30% to 32% from 1991 to 1995, prior to rocketing to approximately 45% in 1999, and then went up in a lesser extent to 47%.

=> Cấu trúc dùng ok rồi, nhưng phần sắp xếp ý thì xem lại cách nhóm hợp lý hơn và báo cáo đúng hơn nhé!

Overall, Netherlands and Sweden were deep => ko dùng deep nhá increased from 1991 to 2001. In Netherlands, the percentage of 49% of workers in 1991, followed by a dramatic rise to nearly 55% in 2001. In Sweden, the percentage of 30% in 1991, after reducing to 48%. UK tends to increase slightly. France is significant decrease from 50% to 30% and Germany tends to decline slightly. In particular, UK and Germany have a percentage of workers who leave because sick the smallest and have the most uniform change, but the two countries have the opposite change.

=> Nồ, Overview ko report số liệu nha, chỉ nói những điều chung chung như xu hướng (tăng giảm, giữ nguyên) hoặc lớn nhất/ nhỏ nhất (nếu có)

Overall, there were almost increases in the percentage of the workers with sickness absence in most countries examined, except for that of France and Germany. It is also noticeable that Gemany had the most smallest number => consistently possessed by far the smallest rate in whole the chart over the period and the figures of => for the sickness absence workers in Netherlands was still on the top of the chart from 1992 to the end of the period.

(Thiếu mất câu topic sentence của tui rồi -_-. Looking first at ...) In the beginning of the period, the percentage of the workers with illness absence in France started at 50%, after which it saw a significant decline to 41% and continued to plummet to 53% at the end of the chart. Opposite with As opposed to France, the data of Sweden workers with illness absence fluctuated in the range from 30% to 33% in the early years of the period (early là năm nào á). Then it grew substantially before coverged => converging with the line => that of France in 1996 and continued to increase to the end of the period. As well as Sweden, the Netherlands had a jump from 48% and surpassed that of France in 1991 to take the first place, after which it had drop => dropped to 43% before jumping again to 52% at the end of the chart.

=> Sai chính tả quá nha, sau before/ after + Ving nhá

- Overall, Germany had => EXPERIENCED a significant rise of SICKNESS absence which made it a dominance of the chart (còn Sweden cũng tăng đâu mất tiêu rồi), WHILE the percentage of French people off from work witnessED a decrease/ WHILE THE OPPOSITE WAS TRUE FOR THAT OF FRANCE. It also can be seen that both UK and Germany share opposite fluctuationS over the period.

- (Câu topic sentence đâu mất tiêu rồi??? Looking first at ....)The percentage of French employees taking sick leave days was the highest in 1991 (report số luôn nha => at exactly 50%), which was surpassed by Netherlands later by 1992 to take the leading role before reaching the highest point with 60% => hitting a high of 60% (câu của em đc nhưng cách diễn đạt chưa hay). Addictionally, after 4 years , Netherlands experienced a significant decrease to reach a low of nearly 40% before increasing => making a recovery to more than 50% in the last year. Sweden also witnessed a sharply growth of illness absented workforce after having some decrease which is similar to Netherlands with lower extend => này diễn đạt chưa ok lắm (Relative similar changes, but at a lesser extent can be seen in the figure for Sweden, which hovered around 31% in the first 5 years, after which it spiked to around 45% in 1999, and a final slow increase to 47% in 2001). It is noticeable that Sweden and France shared opposite data with each other which can be seen in the fall of France and the rise of Sweden

=> Tại vì mình nhóm với phân chia báo cáo số liệu chưa logic nên bài nó bị lòng vòng nhen. Suggest là em nên báo cáo xong 1 nước trước (Netherlands) và main features xung quanh nó trước khi nhảy đến Sweden và France. Vì các số liệu nhiều nước đan xen và việc chưa báo cáo hết sl của nước này mà nhảy qua nước kia làm người đọc khó theo dõi nè

Overall, there were noticeable differences in the percentage of illness absence among the five countries over the period, with the Netherlands recording the highest rates in most of the years examined. In contrast, Germany consistently had the lowest percentage throughout the years. Additionally, Sweden’s figure increased gradually and became the second highest by the end of the period (chưa cần đâu em --> bỏ vào body nhé), while the rates in France, the UK, and Germany remained relatively stable (ụa France có thay đổi nhiều mờ).

=> Em report sai xu hướng rồi, xu hướng mình so sánh đầu cuối để biết nó tăng hay giảm nhé

(Mất câu topic sentence rồi -_-. Looking first at ..) At the beginning of the period, the Netherlands had the highest percentage of workers with illness absence, at around 5% (vào năm bao nhiêu). This figure rise --> rose to about 5.5% in 1993, before dropping to nearly 4% in 1996. After that, it increased again and finished at almost 5.5% in 2001. Similarly, the percentage (của cái nào) in Sweden started at 3% in 1991. It stayed quite stable for a few years, then began to rise from 1995, reaching around 4.5% by the end of the period. This made Sweden the country with the second highest rate in 2001.

=> Ổn nhưng mà chú ý là báo cáo số liệu phải rõ ràng, the percentage thì phải nói rõ là tỷ lệ của cái gì luôn nhé, ko thì mình dùng that in/ of ...

Overall, there were significant increases of workers which --> who (người mà) was --> were (workers là S) taking sick days in Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. However, =>, while France was seen to decrease. Additionally, while Germany experienced many fluctuations over the period.

(Thiếu câu topic sentence. Looking first at ...) The percentage of people who took leave from work due to illness in Netherlands and Sweden, which (em thêm which sẽ thành MĐQH --> thiếu V) showed a similar upward trend. Netherlands started at just under 50% and at 30% in Sweden in the first year --> The figures for Netherlands and Sweden started at just under 50% and 30%, respectively (viết như này dễ hiểu hơn). In 1992,, Netherlands (cái gì của Netherlands nè??) was rise --> rose (này ko dùng bị động đc) at around 55%, which reached (reaching: rút gọn MĐQH) to the peak in the chart, after which it saw a dramatic fall from 1993 to 1996, dropped --> dropping to 41%. But (However,) in 1997, the figure had a dramatic increase trend to below 50% and continued to rise to around 53% in the last years. However, Sweden experienced a brief fluctuation between 1992 and 1995, before rising to around 47% at the end of the period. In contrast, France started at 50% in 1991, and increased slightly 51% in 1992, after which it experiences --> experienced a significant decrease from 41% to around 30% during the period between 1993 and 199 ang remained virtually unchanged in the last five years => câu này đang có vấn đề về dấu câu nên đọc chưa hiểu nè.

=> Bài viết có dùng từ nối đã dạy, tuy nhiên còn sai ngữ pháp khá nhiều. Cần lưu ý các chỗ đã sửa nhé! 

Bên cạnh đó, dùng S phải đầy đủ (cái gì của Netherlands thì giảm ...)

Overall, Netherlands and Sweden saw considerable (thấy gì em?). The UK tends to increase slightly. France is witnessed a significant decrease, and Germany tends to decline slightly. (khúc này sao thấy nó rời rạc quá, ko cần báo cáo kĩ từng trend giảm như nào, giảm tăng chung chung thôi nha, dùng cấu trúc "while" nè. In particular, the UK and Germany have => had a percentage of workers who leave because of sickness the smallest => The UK and Germany's workers who took sickness leaves were the smallest and have => had the most uniform change, but these two countries have the opposite change. => câu này chưa hiểu lắm.

We can saw => ko bắt đầu như này nha (em xem lại bài mẫu nha) in 1991 France had the percentage of employees was the highest => the highest percentage of employees, which had at 50%, Netherlands was just in second. But the Netherlands was => experienced a considerable increase and surpassed France and become = became the first one. The percentage of workers in Netherlands was 55% in 1992, followed by a significant decrease to 41% in 1996, after increasing to 55% in 2001. The percentage of laborers in 1991 was 50%, and then it dramatic decrease => dramatically decreased to 31% and level to 30% in 2001. In Sweden, it started with 30% and increasing and decreasing steadily => 2 này ko nên để chung nhé, negligible throughout the first four years. Until 1996, the percentage (của cái gì á) increased dramatically and reached 45% in 1999, and then increased slightly and reached 48% in 2001.

=> Ròi, viết còn sai ngữ pháp nhiều quá nên là làm rối câu nà, rèn ngữ pháp lại nhé. Em tập viết lại bài mẫu trong slide 1 lần nữa, ko chỉnh sửa nội dung nha, ngẫm cách viết ngta nè

• Học lại cấu trúc nhé, do còn viết sai

=> ok dữ ta, good job

Overall, Netherlands stayed mostly at the highest rate of sickness absence. France experienced a gradual increase, whereas Sweden showed a significant decline. Additionally, the UK and Germany showed a fluctuate relatively trends => a relatively fluctuating trend/ relative fluctuation over the period.

=> Rồi xu hướng của Netherland đâu?

(Thiếu câu topic sentence rồi???) The Netherlands stood out with the highest percentage of workers taking sick leave, at approximately 5.5%, this => which (2 câu ko nối nhau bằng dấu ",") was significantly higher than in France and Sweden, where the figures were around 5% and 3%, respectively, in 1992. These two countries exhibited (phía trên em vừa nhắc 2 nc France and Sweden nên ngta sẽ nghĩ these là 2 nc này nha), while France rapidly fall => fell from 5% to 3%, Sweden showed the steadily => steady rise.

=> Body này có sáng tạo về cách viết, so sánh nhiều nhưng mà phần báo cáo số liệu chưa đầy đủ 

Chia wordform sai nhiều nha -_-

the line chart illustrated => illustrates the proportion of the workforce took => taking sick days from 1991 to 2001 in five nations

OVERVIEW

overall, the percentage of workers with illness in both the UK and GERMANY remained virtually unchanged between 1991 and 2001. A slightly increase was seen in the percentage of workers off from work in Netherlands over the period. Meanwhile, there was a significant growth in the percentage of the workforce being absent from work due to illness in France , as opposed to opposite with reducing sharply in that of Sweden.

BODY 1

(topic sentence??) The proportion of taking leave from work due to illness in France was the highest in exactly 50% from the first year, after which it was passed by a slightly rise in Netherlands from around 48% to 54%, so => ko dùng so Netherlands was the on top of the propotion of workforce off from work in the following years. However, the figure in France dropped significantly from around 51% to 30% from 1991 to 2001. Simultaneously, the percentage in Sweden rose sharply from exactly 30% to nearly 50%, this => which indicates that trends in Sweden and France were contrasting through => over 10 years. After three countries with irregular fluctuations, the percentage of workers taking sick leave in the UK remained relatively stable, with no significant changes. Despite the stability, it still ranked as the second lowest among all countries shown in the chart. Finally, Germany had the lowest percentage of people taking sick leave among all the countries shown. Over the span of 10 years, this figure remained around 20%, showing a stable trend similar to that of the UK, but at a consistently lower level.

=> Good job nha

=> Good job!

Ok đó, chỉ có phần gạch nó sai ngữ pháp thôi, câu đó của em nếu dùng "as opposed to" thì chưa có V. Với as opposed to mình dùng như liên từ nha

Overall, with the exception of the Congo, which experienced a modest decline, all other nations recorded increases in the amount of daily oil production. It is also noticeable that the statistics for Nigeria is the largest, with Chad and Somalia being the smallest by the end of the period.

Looking first at the volume of oil produced per day in Nigeria and Congo, which respectively consistently (thay chữ này cho đa dạng) took the first and the second places over the whole period. A slight rise can be seen in the figure for Nigeria from 205,000 to 210,000 between 2000 and 2001, followed by a modest fall to 190,000 in 2002, then bounced back to 210,000 in 2003 and surpassed the figure for Congo at 213,000 in 2004 to become => take a leading role by the end of the period. The quantity of per-day => daily oil production in Congo witnessed a decline at a consistent rate (dùng như này tỉ lệ ko thay đổi) throughout the period (báo cáo số liệu nc này luôn nha em).

With regard to the figures for Chad and Somalia, which =>whose figures were the lowest role in the whole period. The level of oil production on a daily basis in Chad reached a plateau (ủa này là đạt đỉnh mà???) in the first 3 years at 0 barrels, prior to (nó ko dùng sau dấu phẩy đâu em) => before soaring to 50,000 in 2004, which is equal to the data of Somalia in the same year. The statistic of Somalia saw a marginal growth from 5,000 to 50,000 (years??) - => ,,,10 times as much as the figure of the first year.

• Hem nên dùng mấy từ lạ lạ mà ko check từ điển nho.

• prior to em dùng như này: I saw her stealing my friend wallet prior to leaving our classroom.

• statistics dùng cũng ok nhưng mà chú ý "s": khi nói về số liệu của nc đó thì dùng "statistics", còn khi nói 1 single number của dãy số liệu đó thôi thì dùng "statistic"

Overall, Nigeria and Congo produced the highest amount of oil while Chad and Somalia are both share the lowest place. (Rồi cái trends đâu????)

Looking first at Nigerian and Congolese oil production statistics, there was a slight increase of => in oil barrels from between 2000 and 2001 with 5,000 barrels which makes => made it 210,000 in total in that year (em nêu 2 năm rồi that là năm nào => này văn nói quá nhe). After that, Nigeria experienced a small fall with 20,000 barrels before rising again to its peak in 2004 with 213,000 barrels. Congo, in the other hand => bu contrast, witnessed a consistently decline from 275,000 barrels a day to 203,000 at => in 2004, which its dominance got => and then it surpassed by Nigeria in that period.

Turning to Chad and Somalia, it is noticeable that Chad didn't (ko viết tắt) have any data (có data mà chỉ là sản lượng là 0 thôi) in the first 3 years and then started with daily 8,000 barrels per day before reaching to its peak at 50,000 in 2004. Additionally, Somalia made a gradual rise yearly from 5,000 in 2000 and reachesed its peak at 50,000 in 4 years,,, which sharesed the same statistic with Chad in this year.

Viết sai ngữ pháp vs dùng từ tùm lum quá nha, xem lại bài của Ngọc tham khảo nhé

Overall, the levels of oil production increased significantly in most countries, except for Congo, where it steadily declined. Additionally, Nigeria was the biggest oil producer throughout the period, while Chad and Somalia experienced only slight growth over the four years.

Looking first at Nigeria, the amount of oil produced started at 205,000 and rose to 210,000 in 2001, after which the => this figure/ it was a slightly decreased => decreased slightly in 2002 at => to 190,000 before increasing again/ bounced back to 213,000 by 2004, making it the highest oil produced. In contrast, Congo began at 275,000, which is=> was the peak over the period. However, in the next year,,, oil output dropped sharply to 234,000 and then it continued to decrease from 222,000 to 215,000 between 2001 and 2003. Finally, the figure it fell to 203,000, placing it in second place.

Turning to Chad and Somalia, they had a similar pattern of oil production per day. Chad produced no oil during the first 3 years and reached 8,000 barrels per day in 2003, followed by a dramatic rise to 50,000 in the last year. Meanwhile, Somalia was at 5,000 and rose to 8,000 then to 17,000, after that it was 21,000 from 2001 to 2003. In the final year, oil production in Somalia equalled that of Congo, at 50,000.

Nhớ thêm đơn vị là barrels sau số liệu nhé, còn lại good job rùi nhen

Overall, while Congo was the leading oil producer at the beginning of the period, its production steadily declined over the years. In contrast, Chad and Somalia experienced significant increases in their output, especially towards the end of the period. Nigeria showed relatively stable figures throughout.,

Chad and Somalia both started with low or no oil production, but their outputs increased remarkably over time. Chad produced no oil until 2003, when it entered the market with 8,000 barrels per day, then rapidly escalated to 50,000 barrels in 2004. Similarly, Somalia’s production rose steadily from 5,000 barrels in 2000 to match Chad’s figure of 50,000 barrels by the end of the period. Despite their late start, these two countries showed strong upward trends, in contrast to more established producers.

In contrast, Nigeria and Congo, both of which had substantial oil output in 2000, followed divergent patterns. Nigeria maintained relatively stable production, beginning with 205,000 barrels in 2000 and ending with a slightly higher figure of 213,000 in 2004. Congo, on the other hand, experienced a consistent decline, falling from the highest initial production of 275,000 barrels in 2000 to 203,000 barrels by 2004. This inverse relationship highlights how Nigeria’s industry remained steady, whereas Congo’s oil production gradually lost momentum over time.

In summary, while newer producers like Chad and Somalia showed dramatic growth, established producers followed more contrasting trends, with Nigeria maintaining output and Congo experiencing a decline.

Overall, almost countries have => had an increase in oil except for Congo. In contrast, Chad and Somalia have increase in oil production, especially in the last two years. Nigeria is the largest amount (nước này sao mà là largest amount đc dị nhỏ => producer) of oil in the 4 Countries.

In detail, Congo began with the highest output at 275,000 barrels per day in 2000. However, this number dropped steadily to 203,000 barrels in 2004. Nigeria produced 205,000 barrels per day, => .... This countries => country increased slightly in first two years and decreased to 190,000 in 2002. In 2003, Nigeria increased equal number of Barrels with 2001 => the same level and up to 213,000 in 2004.

Turning to Chad, in the first three years,,,, has =>had no production, but it started to produce to 8,000 barrels in 2003 and reaching => reached 50,000 in 2004. Similarly, Somalia began with 5,000 barrels in 2000 and show => saw a strong => significant growth to 50,000 barrels in 2004, equal to the daily oil make => made from Chad.

In conclusion, Nigeria and Congo have the highest beginning and still keeping the position after 4 years. Chad and Somalia have smallest barrels but produce significantly in 2004. => Ê task 1 hong có conclusion nha =))))

Sai ngữ pháp với quên chia thì nha, em tham khảo bài Đông Nghi nhé

Overall, Congo produced the most oil throughout the period, despite a steady decline. Nigeria’s production remained relatively stable, while Chad and Somalia experienced significant increases in output by 2004 after starting with very low or no production.

In 2000, Congo had the highest production at 275,000 barrels per day, but this figure fell each year, ending at 203,000 barrels in 2004. Nigeria’s oil output fluctuated slightly, starting at 205,000 in 2000, dropping to 190,000 in 2002, and rising again to 213,000 in 2004.

Chad did not produce any oil in the first three years, but began output in 2003 at 8,000 barrels and saw a substantial increase to 50,000 barrels per day in 2004. Similarly, Somalia started at just 5,000 barrels in 2000 but consistently increased its production to reach the same level as Chad by 2004.

In conclusion, while Congo and Nigeria remained the dominant oil producers throughout the period, newer producers like Chad and Somalia showed rapid growth, particularly in the final year.

Bài này của chat GPT hả?? Body 1, Ms ko dạy viết conclusion nhé em. Viết lại bài này nha. Tham khảo cách viết của Đông Nghi

Overall, there was => were almost increases in the quantity of oil is (mệnh đề qh rút gọn) made day-to-day in 4 countries,,, except for that of Congo, which hold => held the first position in => at the beginning of the chart. It is also noticeable that Nigeria jumped to take the leading role,,, while Chad and Somalia both hold the last position at the end of the chart.

Looking first at the number of oil was produced per day in Congo and Nigeria, which had the both largest numbers in the whole chart. The figure of => for the daily oil production in Nigeria saw a marginal rise from 205.,,,,000 (dấu ngăn cách đơn vị là "," nhé) barrels to 210.000 barrels at the beginning of the period, after which it fell significantly to 190.000 barrels before making a recovery to 210.000 again in 2003 and continued to grow and surpassed the ammount of oil in Congo to take the leading role with 213.000 barrels at the end of the period. As opposed to Nigeria, the Congolese oil was produced per day was started at the top number of the whole chart with 275.000 barrels of oil before it saw a non-stop => consistent decline from 2001 to the end of the chart,,,, and ending at 203.000 barrels.

About that for Turning next to Chad and Somalia , there were => was a dramatic growth about => in the oil production in both countries. In the first three years of the period, Chad didn’t => did not join into the race of produce oil so the figure in this three years of Chad if 0 barrels (thừa). However, it saw a considerable increase in 2003 when it jumped from 0 to 8.000 barrels and it continued to spike and ending => ended at 50.000 at the end of the period. Like Chad, Somalia started with 5.000 barrels of oil in 2000, after which it started to grow continuously to the end of the chart before ending at 50.000 barrels, which was ten times as much as the quantity in the first year of the period and this number helped => made Somalia stand in the same level with Chad in 2004. 

Cách diễn đạt tốt hơn nhiều rồi nhé, tuy nhiên vẫn còn lỗi sai ngữ pháp như chia thì sai, giới từ. Em xem lại bài.