https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs en-us 2022-02-21 06:33:48 UTC 2022-02-21 21:57:45 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059407865 If you aren't the primary audience then you might find the source to be very unappealing. You also may not have prior knowledge on what the source is talking about which can lead to confusion.]]> 2022-02-21 21:44:49 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059407865 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059408092 You will most likely have a hard time understanding what the reading is saying due to its use of potentially foreign terms. You also might find it boring during an initial read-through. To combat this, you'll need to utilize some of the strategies in rhetorical reading.]]> 2022-02-21 21:45:09 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059408092 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413567 Rosenberg describes the process of finding the main argument/idea of a scholarly source as "reading smarter not harder." After finding this main argument/idea, your reading is not complete. The process consists of reading everything but the "meat" of the article (abstract, section headings, intro, conclusion, etc.) so that you can gain a full understanding of the overall main idea and fully comprehend the rest.]]> 2022-02-21 21:51:37 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413567 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413614 Rosenberg describes the process of finding the main argument in a sort of broken down way. Instead of reading the topic mindlessly, she encourages us to break it down into sections and read them in a different way. Instead of reading it in a linear way, we should break it down and read them in an uneven way so we can find the "holy grail of the main argument"]]> 2022-02-21 21:51:41 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413614 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413826 Rosenberg thought it great to focus on the goals of the chapter. In addition , to considering the audience as well as the summary below the reading to have an understanding.
 ]]> 2022-02-21 21:52:01 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413826 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413849

I believe that if you aren't the "Primary Audience" for a scholarly source that you won't get the main idea that is being written. You won't be able to relate to any of the ideas being pointed out.]]> 2022-02-21 21:52:03 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059413849 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059415623 Reading like a writer and rhetorical reading is both the same as both require you to think deeper about the literary piece you are presented.  
For reading like a writer, you analyze why the author included this piece of literacy and why it is important to that topic. 
Such as the case for rhetorical reading, you are reading for a way of understanding why the included a piece of information , and was that the best pathway to get to that purpose.]]> 2022-02-21 21:54:28 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059415623 https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059415759 Rhetorical reading and reading like a writer are different as in rhetorical reading refers to a variety of practices that helps us understand how the texts work and engage deeply in a conversation, extending beyond the boundaries. Meanwhile, reading like a writer is more about getting into the author's shoes and ask ourselves questions about the author's text. ]]> 2022-02-21 21:54:39 UTC https://padlet.com/matthewbarrish/u5c5mf8khcyu0djs/wish/2059415759