https://padlet.com/larissapomrehn/u21ziu6escqhlxty en-us 2022-08-31 09:09:46 UTC 2022-08-31 10:09:21 UTC hello@padlet.com larissapomrehn https://padlet.com/larissapomrehn/u21ziu6escqhlxty/wish/2277475736 - Very few search terms
- Not explaining why you chose the search terms
- Development of framework does not seem structured and understandable
- Different clusters of framework are not explained in detail and do not seem to fit into the theoretical construct
- No neutral stance towards literature
- No explanation regarding the methodology of the reviewed papers (quantitative, qualitative etc.)
- Not stating inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Not explaining why this review is important
- Too many figures (too descriptive)
- To what extend do you need the mapping of the field?]]> 2022-08-31 09:16:52 UTC https://padlet.com/larissapomrehn/u21ziu6escqhlxty/wish/2277475736 larissapomrehn https://padlet.com/larissapomrehn/u21ziu6escqhlxty/wish/2277476383 - Regarding the fragmentation of terminology, it would be good to try the commonly labeled terms associated with the specific processes and activities. These terms would be used to develop the search string
- Combining developed clusters with theoretical frameworks
- Building a bridge to bring several disciplines together
- Build a table and point out different types of studies (theoretical/empirical, quan/qual/mixed, N, etc.)
- Clear structure in terms of outcomes
- Should be short
- Good motivation: elaborate more about it
- Layout: whole process of selection the literature in a figure
- Tables: filters (inclusion & exclusion criteria)
- Tables: summaries of other studies (evaluation of certain characteristics, not being simply descriptive)]]> 2022-08-31 09:17:41 UTC https://padlet.com/larissapomrehn/u21ziu6escqhlxty/wish/2277476383