https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch All this fuss over ketchup on a hot dog? en-us 2020-08-30 21:26:49 UTC 2025-10-29 14:02:03 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f32d.png mabajian1 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712608875 Pang uses such a strong word to show to impact of repeated ideology in a culture; in Chicago culture. He shares the idea that if a group is told something often enough it becomes an unspoken law. It becomes ingrained. ]]> 2020-09-01 17:32:20 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712608875 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712609405 In this context, Pang ]]> 2020-09-01 17:32:30 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712609405 hbower1 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712610524 -It's saying like people not being allowed to put ketchup on hot dogs is considered to be a fact and he references the absurdity that that is a fact.
- It shows negativity in the article by explaining explicitly that there is no right or wrong and those who think that are resorting to historonics ]]> 2020-09-01 17:32:46 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712610524 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712612490 Enlarged beyond truth or reasonableness.]]> 2020-09-01 17:33:14 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712612490 thopman https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712612919 1) He used it to describe the history of putting ketchup on a meat, to hide the flavor in a time of war if the meat were to go bad. 

2) He used the word to show he was "giving up his religion of no ketchup on hotdog" to have some flavor on meat during wartime.

3) He is forced to put ketchup on the hotdog which he would never do unless it was necessary, and in the case of wartime he is willing to break that sacred rule.

4) To emphasize how important it is that the only time this rule is broken would be during a time of absolute necessity such as wartime.]]> 2020-09-01 17:33:20 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712612919 nryken https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712613474 1. To call out the people who think touching a hot dog to ketchup is a sin.
2. To describe how the people who feel extremely passionate about not putting ketchup on a hotdog are a small group; however, they make themselves loud enough that they seem large.
3. He thinks it's outrages that people think that they can tell people how to eat a hot dog and go as far as to call their oppositions sinners purely because of their condiment preferences.
4. To show how angry he is with this while keeping a formal tone.  He is taking on Chicago's status quo and so he needs to keep a formal tone but  also address his feelings towards these people.]]> 2020-09-01 17:33:28 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712613474 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712614394 1.He uses canard to describe how the people of Chicago play along with the idea that they hate ketchup. 
2. He chose this word because it has a negative connotation and shows how strongly he feels.
4. He uses strong language throughout to shame those who tell others that they are not allowed to put ketchup on a hot dog.

]]> 2020-09-01 17:33:41 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712614394 myourell https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712615461 .1. He uses it describe how far the Chicagoan hatred of ketchup has gone.


2. He uses it to describe the negative effect or reputation putting ketchup on a hot dog has. 

3. He is saying that the Chicago ketchup belief has gotten to a point where it can be compared to a religious belief.

4. He uses such strong language to show the greater effect putting ketchup on a hotdog is to people in the Chicago Area.]]> 2020-09-01 17:33:57 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712615461 jparisi3 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712615562 1.he uses the word to describe Chicagoans' distaste for putting ketchup on hotdogs.

2.in this context, it means a feeling of intense dislike

3. same as 1

4.he uses such strong language to mock chicagoans]]> 2020-09-01 17:33:58 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712615562 amoutidis1 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712616108 In the context of the sentence he uses the noun to describe how dramatic Royko's sentiment truly is. Along with how absurd it is to say that one should never put ketchup on a hot dog because Chicagoan"s say so.]]> 2020-09-01 17:34:06 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712616108 cmaheras https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712617497 1. In this context Pang is referring to a false sense of reality that Chicagoans have succumb to that has become ingrained and accepted as reality
2. Same as 1
3. Pang is saying that history is wrong and that Chicagoans have given into believing everything they read.
4. Pang's use of strong and in some cases belligerent language helps to accentuate his point. He displays his feelings that the Chicago axiom about ketchup on hotdogs is absurd]]> 2020-09-01 17:34:27 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712617497 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712618042 1. Pang uses this word by talking about taste and people's preferances.
2. In context it means that people have different tastes, so everyone has a right to putting ketchup on their hot dog if that's what they like.
3. Pang is saying that as he's grown up his tastes have changed.
4. He uses strong words like this to sound more sophisticated and he uses palate as evidence. It shows that tastes can change, so everyone can have different opinions.]]> 2020-09-01 17:34:35 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712618042 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712622156 1. He uses the word to show how big of a controversy such a little thing can cause. 
2. It means an intense feeling of dislike
3. He's saying that a condiment on a hot dog could cause a big uproar
4. To mimmick or make fun of the people that make such a big deal about little things such as ketchup.]]> 2020-09-01 17:35:33 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712622156 cgriffin80 https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712622841 1.) He uses it when talking about history facts of hot dogs and ketchup.
2.) In this context of this sentence theorized means hypothesis. 
3.) Pang is using theorized to show the history and science behind the statement.
4.) He uses such strong language to make his evidence stronger and harder to argue with ]]> 2020-09-01 17:35:43 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712622841 smarushchak https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712639445 1.Pang uses the word indignation to show the anger Chicagons feel when someone tells ketchup should go on a hot dog. 
2.In the context of the article/sentance indignation means people have the right to their anger even though it can come off as unfair. 
3. Pang is saying it's unfair to push people not to put ketchup on hot dogs. 
4. Pang uses such strong language to show people how ridiculous it is to tell people not to put ketchup on hot dogs. He makes his agrument harder to agrue. ]]> 2020-09-01 17:39:41 UTC https://padlet.com/maine207/tzp2vdzfhlrluzch/wish/712639445