My own view is that __________. Though I concede that ______________, I still maintain that ______________. For example, ________________. Although some might object that _________________, I would reply that _______________. The issue is important because ________________.

My own view is that both of these should be put into effect. Though I concede that I am no expert, nor do I quite grasp how much effort that would take from both parties to not only overhaul the system, but also allow for a policy, I still maintain that there needs to be more space, but also be a set limit that one can use these resources. For example, there will always be migrants, and today there will be more than ever, so the system would need to be expanded to accomodate them as well as a policy to prevent them from taking up space that incoming migrants desperately need. Although some might object that I have no idea what I am talking about, I would reply that if you simply look at the data and look at what we have to offer incoming migrants, we are in some trouble. The issue is important because as a nation founded on immigrants, explorers, and dreams of a better life, it is our duty to see it through that others can have that same opportunity coming here today.

In recent discussions of the New York Immigration crisis, a controversial issue has been whether to put a limit on length of stay in shelters. On the one hand, some argue that that is inhumane and they should build more shelters. From this perspective, it would cost tax payers countless money. On the other hand, however, others argue that we need to move them away from the city. In the words of the right, one of this view's main proponents, "The city has projected the cost of the migrant crisis will rise to $12 billion by the 2025 fiscal year… ‘The simple truth is that longtime New Yorkers and asylum-seekers will feel these potential cuts — and they will hurt,’. According to this view, everyone will feel the struggles of the crisis. In sum, then, the issue is whether we stop immigration or pay to accommodate.

My own view is that the federal law is too flexible to prevent criss. Though I concede that we should have immigrants, I still maintain that the volume of which they come in is the deciding factor. For example, Shelters run out of space the faster and faster they come in. Although some might object that the city is at fault for not being prepared, I would reply that the city is limited in resources and nobody can prepare for that much. The issue is important because both long time citizens and new migrants will feel the horrible affects.

My own view is that the federal government should step in not only financially, but to relocate many of the migrants to proper housing outside of the city. Though I concede that some migrants have family inside the city, I still maintain that they should be relocated outside the city, for example, they would have a proper traveling distance that is still acceptable to visit family members. Although some might object that they should live with their family, I would reply that it is affecting the families that we already living in NYC. The issue is important because it affects not only the people of NYC but also the migrants, taxpayers, and everyday life for everyone in NYC.

My own view is that we should not house the migrants. Though I concede that they have been through a lot, I still maintain that it is damaging our cities and bad for the economy. For example, we as Americans are paying for the migrants through taxes. Although some might object that its worth it and we're barely paying anything, I would reply that it's my money nevertheless and there should be no reason the government is using it to pay for illegally emigrated migrants. The issue is important because it affects our borders, economy, ect.

My own view is that the border isn't secure enough. Though I concede that a lot of immigrants are stopped at the borders, I still maintain the borders let too many immigrants in. For example there is a rising number of the immigrants in the United States. Although some might object that the majority does get stopped, I would reply that the mojority ios not enough. The issue is important because there is still a large number of immigrants entering the US effecting the citizens of the US

My own view is that we should provide basic needs while also pushing to get jobs and be able to provide for themselves. Though I concede that some of them will take advantage of the system and privlage provided by us, I still maintain that we should give them something even if its not a lot. For example, giving them a place to stay for a certain length of time. Although some might object that they will take advantage of it and use the housing in dishonest ways , I would reply that showing care will make them want to provide for themselves more than showing hate and disrepect. The issue is important because it affects the civilians of the u.s and the other country and also it is our job and duty as christians to show love to everyone even if they may not deserve it.

My own View is that we need to secure our border from these illegal migrants because there are major criminals entering our country with drugs to sell to the American people which will harm them. Though I concede that we cant keep everyone out, I still maintain that we can control the crisis and make it so their aren't as many illegals crossing the border. For example, when we have so many illegals in New York they, take many spots in homeless shelters and they crowd all these shelters. Although some might object that we need to protect Americans first, I would reply that they are in America legally and are citizens of the US. The issue is important because it can put the safety of American citizens in Jeopardy.

In recent discussions of NYC migrations a controversial issue has been whether the 60 day limit is necessary for immigrants . On the one hand, some argue that these struggling families require more than 60 days to find good jobs and housing. From this perspective, more shelters would need to be built to supply space for the thousands of immigrants arriving each week. On the other hand, however, others argue that 60 days is plenty of time for people to find jobs and housing. In the words of mayor Adams, one of this view’s main proponents, “We are really,really struggling with families with children” According to this view, there is an overflow of children and families in the shelter system. In sum, then, the issue is whether to take down the 60 day maximum for these new immigrants or creating more shelters so that immigrants can stay in them longer.

My own view is that 60 days is plenty of time to find housing and a job. Though I concede that it is not a huge window of time, I still maintain that there are too many immigrants needing to share the same shelters . For example,the immigrant numbers will only increase. Although some might object that 60 days is too minimal, I would reply that if the immigrants really wanted to be apart of our nation then they would try really hard to do anything that they could to get accumulated into our society. The issue is important because our streets are becoming overcrowded with the overflow of these shelters from people misusing their time in America and taking the shelter system for granted.

My own view is that there will be too many people that will come into the states. Though I concede that there are times when we can let people in, but there is a limit to that, I still maintain that it could cause a lot of damage. For example, shelters are already fillings up, causing more people on the streets. Although some might object that we can build more shelters, I would reply that we will eventually run out of space and not have enough room whether it is in jobs or homes. The issue is important because it affects a whole population of people living in America.

My own view is that we do need to limit the amount of immigrants entering the U.S and if they are they need to enter legally. Through I concede that we are supposed to let people get the same opportunities that we have, I still maintain that they need to do it the correct way. For example, there are many construction workers that are immigrants legal and illegal and they are doing great work but many jobs are being filled where Americans were before. Although some might object that we need those immigrant workers to keep our construction industry going, I would reply that they are correct but the immigrants still need to do it legally because, if they want the same opportunities they can't take short cuts to get tax advantages that the American citizens have to pay for them. The issue is important because it continues to be more relevant and different politicians have different views so the votes coming from the American citizens matter more then some may think.

My own view is that they should have a limit to their stay, because if they don't have a limit, some of them wouldn't have any motive to move on and just take up tax dollars. Though I concede that some might need more time to get set up for success, I still maintain that they should have a 60 day limit because its there own fault for coming over illegally, so we should focus our shelters and tax dollars more on the people of the United States. For example, using the shelters for the many homeless people in new york. Although some might object that the new migrants will make up that homeless population, I would reply that we still have to look out for our own first and try to help them out the best we can. The issue is important because if we don't do anything to help the migrants, then New york will be overrun with a lot of people who don't know what to do, or if we do too much and neglect the same treatment for our own citizens.

In recent discussions of the NYC migrant crisis, a controversial issue has been, whether immigrant families should be given longer than 60 days to find shelter. On the one hand, some argue that New York can help them and the government grant them work. From this perspective, Errol Louis says that New York is one of the biggest economies, generating $2 trillion. Therefore they would be able to help these immigrants. On the other hand, however, others argue that the border needs to be secured in order to solve this problem. In the words of Byron York, one of this view's main proponents, "How did the [other] 97,000 get to New York? First of all, the Biden administration appears to be directly arranging flights of illegal border crossers to the New York area… ‘One attraction’ for the illegal border crossers is ‘New York's self-designation as a sanctuary city.’" According to this view, the immigrants are taking advantage of our good country even despite the consequences, they know they will not be turned over to immigration authorities. In sum, then, the issue is whether we help them or we let them feed off of our gracious economy.

My own view is that we should help them. Though I concede that we could run out of resources, I still maintain that the US is a free country that isn't called the land of opportunities for anything. For example, over 3.5 million refugees have entered the United States since 1975. Although some might object that we are being too gracious, I would reply that there is no such thing. The issue is important because we are called to help those in need.

My own view is that they should have a set amount of time in the shelter allowing them to get their lives together. Though I concede that it might cost a lot financially, I still maintain that it is necessary and proper. For example, some immigrants come to America without a plan and assume they can permanently live in the shelter . Although some might object that that it is inhumane to limit their stay, I would reply that it's necessary to have other immigrants move on so the shelters have room for new arrivals The issue is important because it revolves around human life.