In his article "The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished," Bruce Fein says that the death penalty is important for punishing serious crimes like murder and treason. He wants to show that the death penalty helps achieve justice and stops future crimes by making people scared to commit them. Fein mainly writes for people in law and policymakers, as well as anyone interested in the death penalty debate. He uses pathos, like the Holocaust, to highlight how serious some crimes are, making his argument stronger. This approach encourages readers to think about the moral duty to punish terrible acts harshly. The article explains that getting rid of the death penalty would weaken the justice system and disrespect the suffering of victims. However, one problem is that Fein doesn’t fully address the arguments against the death penalty, which might make his viewpoint seem biased. Even with this issue, the article is helpful for understanding why some people believe the death penalty is necessary, adding an important perspective to the ongoing debate.

David Muhlhausen's article "The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished" says that capital punishment is important for justice and stopping serious crimes like murder. He argues that the death penalty can scare potential criminals away from committing crimes, using studies that show a link between executions and lower murder rates. The article targets lawmakers, police, and the public, especially those unsure or against the death penalty. Muhlhausen uses both logos and ethos to make his argument more convincing. This source helps explain the death penalty debate by showing it as both a moral and practical way to reduce crime, adding depth to discussions about ending it. However, one weakness is that the article may show bias toward the death penalty and doesn't fully discuss ethical issues or the risk of wrong executions. Even with this flaw, the article is useful for research on the death penalty because it provides a strong argument for keeping it, backed by data, which is important for understanding different viewpoints in the ongoing debate.

Dudley Sharp's article "The Death Penalty Is Not Discriminatory," published in 2002, argues that the death penalty is applied fairly and is not affected by racial bias. He says that the race of the victims is often more important than the race of the offenders in death penalty cases. He wants to challenge the common belief that the death penalty is unfair. Sharp writes for both supporters and opponents of the death penalty because he wants to provide a different view from the usual arguments against it. He uses logos to support his claims, encouraging readers to rethink their ideas about racial bias in the justice system. This article helps explain the death penalty debate by making the idea of discrimination more complex. However, it has some weaknesses, like oversimplifying complicated racial issues and not addressing other viewpoints. Overall, even with these problems, the article is useful for research on the death penalty because it defends its fairness and adds to the ongoing discussion about its role in society.

Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints,

link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010124243/OVIC?u=cobb90289&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=2c0ac9fc. Accessed 1 Oct. 2024.

John Stuart Mill's article "Society Must Retain the Death Penalty for Murder" argues that the death penalty is necessary for the most serious crimes, especially murder. Mill believes that the death penalty helps stop crime and keeps society safe, saying it is a moral duty for society to punish serious offenses harshly. The article is aimed at lawmakers and the public who care about crime and justice. Mill uses both logos and ethos to persuade readers about the importance of the death penalty. However, the article might show bias toward keeping authority and order, possibly ignoring worries about wrongful convictions and the chance of misusing power. Overall, this source is helpful for understanding the arguments in favor of the death penalty and its role in society, adding to the ongoing discussions about capital punishment and its effects on justice.

Fein, Bruce. "The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished." The Death Penalty, edited by Jenny Cromie and Lynn M. Zott, Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010124291/OVIC?u=cobb90289&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=85504aaf. Accessed 1 Oct. 2024. Originally published as "Individual Rights and Responsibility—The Death Penalty, but Sparingly," Human Rights, 17 June 2008.

Muhlhausen, David. "The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished." Criminal Justice, edited by Noël Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010120283/OVIC?u=cobb90289&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=4e2865d0. Accessed 1 Oct. 2024. Originally published as "The Death Penalty Deters Crime and Saves Lives," vol. 271, 2007.

Mill, John Stuart. "Society Must Retain the Death Penalty for Murder (1868)." The Death Penalty, edited by Mary E. Williams,Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints,link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010124243/OVIC?u=cobb90289&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=2c0ac9fc. Accessed 1 Oct. 2024.