'Poshness tests block working-class applicants at top companies' by Karina Blanco Hilm https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi Work sheet - group work (questions 3, 4 and 5) en-us 2018-09-30 08:27:38 UTC 2024-11-28 12:48:03 UTC hello@padlet.com Robert, Daniel & Mads https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289013707 3. 
- Limited opportunities 
- excluded 
- Relatively hidden category 
- Social mobility 
- Soft skills 
- Environment 
- university og London
- Legacy 
- Poshness 
- Snobbery 

4. The message is that companies shouldn't judge their applicants on wether they are posh or not. 
The sender is Matthew weaver and the news outlet he is writing for which is the guardian.
The receiver is the middle class and . The ones below the middle class, because they are the ones they are trying to get a reaction out of.

5. Its a biased article by the writer, because it  isn't factual. nd based on the writers prejudice about the companies. This is shown in the entire article but especially on the first page "found that old fashioned snobbery about accents and mannerisms was being used by top companies".]]> 2018-10-04 08:47:31 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289013707 Frida, Mikkel, Claudia & Frederik https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289013737 3. Make 10 keywords
1: Social class
2: Youngsters
3: Working class
4: Background
5: Limited opportunities
6: Jugde
7: hard working
8: Top companies
9: Parents
10: Excluded

4. Message, sender, and receiver
Message:
To inform the readers that there is a problem with social classes in the UK, also to inform people that the problem is probably bigger than people think.
Sender: 
The sender is The guardian and the reporter Matthew Weaver.

Receiver:
Matthew Weaver is trying to get as many people as possible to notice the problem. Mainly the receiver is people reading The Guardian.

Rhetorical techniques:
The reporter is really subjective, he is not stating actual facts, but more stating facts based on his opinion. He is not taking and conclusions in perspective to other statistics or other peoples research.
Which mean this article is biased, we do not hear other perspectives than Matthew Weaver.

6. Conclude on the article.

The upper class have a lot more opportunities then the other classes in UK, examples universities and business. We can perspective the UK to Denmark. In Denmark we do not have the same system of classes, we do not put our self in boxes, in the same way as they do in UK.

]]> 2018-10-04 08:47:37 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289013737 Frederikke & Ida https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289013930 Genre:
Article
Sender:
The sender i Matthew Weaver writing an article for the Guardian, published June 15 2015. Matthew Weaver is a reporter on the Guardian. Beside Matthew Weaver as the sender, the Guardian is sender aswell.
Message:
The message is that people nowadays at companies judge and choose new workers because of their social status, which means, that people can have the same education but those who have a higher status, will get choosen. The message is that companies should not choose workers because of their status and background (which school they went to), but because of their skills.
Receiver:  the Guardians readers, which is affluant and young urban consumers with a sense of adventure and willing to try new things.
Rhetorical techniques:
Conclude:]]> 2018-10-04 08:48:11 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289013930 Q. 4, 5 and 6. - Marie og Mariam mariamfernandez0 https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014337 The message is that the companies shouldn't base their applicants on wether they are posh or not 

The sender is Matthew Weaver from the Guardian and the newspaper 'The Guardian'. Matthew is a reporter on the Guardian. 
 
The receiver is people who reads the Guardian. The Guardian is also a british newspaper, so it is mostly British readers. 

Rhetorical techniques:
The article is a biased article, because it is not factual. And also the article is based on the writers prejudice. ]]> 2018-10-04 08:49:36 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014337 Fisse https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014459 2018-10-04 08:50:01 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014459 Hvor finder man opgaven https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014559 2018-10-04 08:50:22 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014559 Lauritsfyren og Oskardrengen: https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014589
3.
soft skills
social environment
legacy
snobbery
background
poshness
social mobility
family
limited opportunities
social classes

4.
Message: companies should not be thinking to much about, whether their applicants are posh or not.

sender: the sender is a writer by the name Matthew Weaver, who writes articles for the publisher "The Guardian". 

the receiver:


]]> 2018-10-04 08:50:25 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014589 Lukas, pat, og filip https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014770 4. 
Message: You shouldn't base some one if they are posh or not
Sender: The sender is Matthew Weaver. It says with big text in the beginning in the subhead.
Receiver: The people who read the guardian, it is a british newspaper.
5. 
It is bias, and is not based on facts.
6. 


]]> 2018-10-04 08:50:58 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289014770 Frederik, Jeppe & Magnus https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289015215  3. make 10 keywords:
- Limited opportunities
- excluded
- Relatively hidden category
- Social mobility
- Soft skills
- Environment
- university og London
- Legacy
- Poshness
- Snobbery

4. Check out: The message, the sender, and the receiver
The message is that companies shouldn't base their applicants on wether they are posh or not
The receiver is the middle class and the people below the middle class, because they are the ones they are trying to get a reaction out of.

5. Rhetorical techniques
It is a biased article by the writer, because it  is not factual.The article is also based on the writers prejudice. This is shown in the whole article. ]]> 2018-10-04 08:52:25 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289015215 https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289020723 2018-10-04 09:06:10 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289020723 https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289022002 2018-10-04 09:10:22 UTC https://padlet.com/karinabhilm/toldrf61hnoi/wish/289022002