by A Russo https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a en-us 2014-11-10 14:31:30 UTC 2015-02-24 19:44:03 UTC hello@padlet.com Do Now 11/13/14 arusso1 https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40423700 You see a branch on the ground. Is it living or nonliving? Come up with a list of reasons why it would be living and reasons why it would be nonliving. Debate it with your partner after you have completed your list.

]]> 2014-11-10 14:31:30 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40423700 Javier Ventura  https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970600 Well I would would say it is nonliving because it is no longer a part of the tree but I heared that you can still find a way to keep it together and it will became a part of the tree again.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:13:48 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970600 Joel Xique https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970619 The branch will dry up and the branch will not be a living thing anymore because the branch cant reproduce again, but it can get rid of waste.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:13:53 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970619 Ju'Nasia Rosa https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970724 If I saw a branch on the ground I would say it is non-living. Its non-living because it is no longer part of the tree.Also because it would stop growing and it wouldn't be able to reproduce.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:17 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970724 Marco Vazquez https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970725 If a branch is on the ground it's nonliving because it's no longer on the tree, and it won't have water or energy.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:17 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970725 Gary cala https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970744 it would now be non-living now it's going to start dieing and if was in a tree branch it would still be alive and it would be part of a tree which is a living thing but now its considered dead.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:19 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970744 Cristian Gaspar https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970787 If i saw a branch on the ground i would say it would be nonliving because it has to be connected to a tree so that the roots could give it energy and food.All the foods need o eat or get energy in order to live and the branch was cutted so it had no live anymore because it cant get anymore food from the roots and no more energy.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:28 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970787 Leyla Melecia https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970794 If I saw a branch on the ground, it would be nonliving because it's on the ground which means it can't grow anymore or evolve or reproduce or anything. If the branch was still on the tree and not on the ground then it would be called living because it would keep on growing with the help from the sun and water.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:30 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970794 Miguel Leocadio https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970806 If there is a branch on the floor I think its non-living because only the whole tree can produce oxygen,if the branch is on the tree its grows leaves so its produces more and if a branch is on the floor it cant grow anything else anymore.I prefer it like it was dead

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:32 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970806 Ahtziri Gonzalez https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970858 If the branch is on the floor is then it is non-living.I think this because then the branch would stops growing and the branch wont do nothing living thing like. For example when thing are non-living are not breathing eating getting energy and non-living things are not providing.When things are living then can grow eat get energy produce things and getting waste,also living thing need sunlight and living thing have cells.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:43 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970858 Jaileen Lorenz https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970912 It would be non-living because it is off the tree. If it broke of the tree it would be non-living because it is going to start to die. This is because it is no longer a part of the living tree. It needs to be connected to the tree to get the food and nutrition.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:14:56 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970912 Camila Ramirez  https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970933 The branch would be dead because it is no longer part of the living tree. Therefore it is dead/non-living. It wont reproduce , it wouldnt be able to get energy from anything, it woulnt be able to grow, maintian homestasis, nor evolve.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:01 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970933 Yessica B https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970946 I would think that the branch is dead because it is not part of the tree anymore so it would get dry.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:07 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970946 Armando_Romero https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970956 No because it is a piece of something living and it won't be able to reproduce again.For example it is like a fossil. A fossil is an ancient part of an animal or left overs after it has died.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:09 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970956 Jose Rugerio  https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970966 The branch on the ground was once living but since the branch dried up and diatached from the tree, the branch is now non-living.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:12 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970966 Isaiah https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970993 If i see a branch on the floor it is nonliving. It is nonliving because it doesn't need air, water, food, or air. If it was living it would move and it would need four things i just named. Without them four things it is not living.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:18 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970993 Denise Cabrera https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970996 If I saw a branch on the ground I think it would be nonliving because it would be all dried up and its not connected to the tree or bush that it originally came from so it technically isn't a part of the entire living thing. 

It wont be interdependent of any body/thing

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:19 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40970996 Elijah.Larenzo.Summerville https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971038 The reason why I believe it's nonliving because since its not connected to the main part of the tree. 1 reason it may be living is if it starts to grow by it's self. A reason why it may be nonliving is that when its not grabbing nutrients from the tree. Also it is not getting energy. Also may be a sign of the tree branch being weak cause there wasn't enough nutrients.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:28 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971038 Joel Martinez https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971059 I would say it would be non-living because its not connected to the tree,i get it if the branch was connected to the tree it would be living cause it consumes water and branches that are still connected on the trees re-produce leaves,and branches that are not connected or still with the tree does not consume its food or everyday need and it doesn't reproduce leaves no more. That's why i say it non-living.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:32 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971059 RONALD CYNTJE  https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971072 if i saw a tree branch on the ground i would think its still a living thing because it probably hasnt been there for a long time because it hasnt desloved

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:35 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971072 Nancy A https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971120 If a branch was on ground it would be no living because well yes it was living when it was stuck to the tree but since the branch fell off it will die because well wont be connected to tree so it wont have oxygen and wont survive without the trees roots.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:50 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971120  :o Kent Torres :o https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971143 If i see a branch on the floor it would be non-living because its not part of a tree and the tree makes the branch living.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:15:56 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971143 Randy Apolinario https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971343 If i saw a branch on the ground it wouldn't be living because since it is not part of the the tree it is not living anymore

]]> 2014-11-13 17:16:46 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971343 Lenny Salas https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971470 If their was a branch on the ground it would would non-living.It's non-living because the branch is not connected to the tree so it doesn't get the water,food,and air that the tree has.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:17:22 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971470 Natalie Flores https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971483 the branch on the ground is non living because living needs energy and water and if it was living it would have o have a leaf attatch to it

]]> 2014-11-13 17:17:24 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971483 Elaysha Williams https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971634 If a tree branch was broken on the ground it would be considered non living even though it was part of a tree which is a living thing.The branch wouldn't be able to eat or grow,reproduce, be interdependent or anything else a living thing is.

]]> 2014-11-13 17:18:07 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971634 caterin Palacios https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971762 it is not living because it has no roots

]]> 2014-11-13 17:18:51 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40971762 Ronald CYNTJE  https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40972127 i would think its living because it probably just fell from the trees so it still probably has living cells

]]> 2014-11-13 17:20:24 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40972127 caterin palacios https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40972897 no

]]> 2014-11-13 17:23:45 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40972897 DERPPY https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40973886 2014-11-13 17:28:35 UTC https://padlet.com/arusso1/1113a/wish/40973886