Environmental vs. Economic by Nicole Logan https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l Please add your viewpoint to Berry's article below. Double tap on the screen and a box will appear. Type your stance into the space provided. Then please connect your response to a classmates that you agree strongly with . Please attach an additional source that supports your viewpoint. (ie: visual, youtube video, article etc.) en-us 2017-09-18 15:40:34 UTC 2024-11-03 08:02:21 UTC hello@padlet.com Disagree--Ally, Kylie and Liz https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189890878 The article says we don't recognize our economies dependence on the natural world. We disagree because we as a society are trying to cut down on those resources. For example, recycling plastic bottles. 

]]> 2017-09-21 18:23:34 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189890878 Agree: Tay, Anna, Lauren, Brenae coctay09 https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891013 A properly ordered economy, putting nature first and consumption last, would start with the household economy and then proceed to  the market economy. ]]> 2017-09-21 18:23:51 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891013 Disagree Jaeger, Jordan, Abdi farabd10 https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891017 We disagree because the economy doesn't serve just wealthy people it also serves the average person contributes to the economy. We also try to preserve nature and we try and create new ways to use energy like solar power or hydroelectric power. We also try and teach people how to recycle and reuse things. ]]> 2017-09-21 18:23:51 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891017 Caitlyn, Maddie, & Austin - Disagree https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891310 We disagree with the following article because in the article it states "spending is not an economic virtue", however, spending leads to innovations in economic growth and an increase in desire to make more product. https://goo.gl/images/izhQvv]]> 2017-09-21 18:24:32 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891310 Agree- Ryder & Ali borale21 https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891330 Without taking care of our environment, everything else would fail. All of our natural resources would disappear and we would have trouble finding resources to build shelter and have food to eat. We only have one planet and can't consume faster then we can afford ]]> 2017-09-21 18:24:35 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891330 Agree- Cody, Ryan and Kyle https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891440 We agree that nature needs to come before economy because manufacturing only provides for wants not what's needed.]]> 2017-09-21 18:24:52 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891440 #2: Agree. (Rachel & Alyssa) The environment should be put before the consumer- "this economy is based upon consumption, which ultimately serves not the ordinary consumers but a tiny class of excessively wealthy people..." "The economy says that every school child needs a computer, every 16 year old needs an automobile, and 18 year old needs to go to college." https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891474 2017-09-21 18:24:57 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189891474 Disagree Tim and Ben https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189892056 The article says to put nature first and consumers last, we think that consumers should come before nature because we care more about ourselves than we do about the squirrels]]> 2017-09-21 18:26:14 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189892056 Disagree Greta https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189986859  I disagree when the article says "lately this economy has been able to create jobs by creating needs" humans do not need to keep creating needs we need to learn how to save our resources and protect the earth.]]> 2017-09-22 03:17:31 UTC https://padlet.com/nlogan3/tjaoq6nrfh0l/wish/189986859