Many people were affected by the fighting.

In the meeting, the leaders agreed to stop fighting and signed a ceasefire agreement.

The ceasefire would start at midnight.

Malaysia, the United States, and China helped organize the meeting.

Everyone hopes for peace and safety in the border area.

**Example 2-3

I think the peace agreement is very important.

It helps protect people who live near the border.

Both countries must trust each other and follow the agreement.

I hope this will lead to long-term peace and friendship.
Peace is better than war.

Miss Supansa Sirikhan No. 1 Class 5/0

Part 1: Opinion Writing

1. What do you think about this peace agreement?

2. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

   Write your opinion (3-5 sentences): ..........................................................................................................................................

2. It’s a good and important step to stop the violence and help affected people.

3. It might work if both sides stay committed and follow through with the plan. Trust and communication are key.

Mr. Anuporn Charoensopha M.5/8 No.24

The video shows a peace meeting between leaders of Thailand, Cambodia, and Malaysia. The leaders discussed recent border conflicts and agreed to stop the fighting immediately. They emphasized the importance of peaceful solutions and promised to work together. They also planned to form a committee to monitor future conflicts. The meeting ended with all leaders shaking hands and showing commitment to peace. It was held in Malaysia and received media attention. People hoped this agreement would bring lasting peace.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think this peace agreement is a good step for the three countries. It shows that they are willing to solve problems through dialogue instead of violence.

3. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

Yes, I think it will work if all countries keep their promises. If they continue to talk and respect each other, they can avoid future conflict. But if one country breaks the agreement, the problems may come back again.

1. On July 28, 2025, Thai and Cambodian leaders held a joint press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, following five days of border clashes. Both sides agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence. The meeting marked a significant step toward peaceful dialogue. The agreement was supported by regional partners and seen as a move toward long-term stability.

2. This peace agreement is a positive and mature response to conflict. It shows that both nations are willing to prioritize diplomacy over violence. Choosing dialogue demonstrates strong leadership and sets a valuable example for the ASEAN region in managing disputes peacefully.

3. The agreement may work in the short term if both sides honor their commitments. However, long-term success depends on addressing deeper issues like border disputes, historical tensions, and national pride. Third-party mediation, such as by Malaysia or ASEAN, can help build trust and ensure that negotiations lead to lasting peace.

   Patcharawat 25 5/8

On July 28, 2025, Thai and Cambodian leaders held a joint press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, following five days of border clashes. Both sides agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence. The meeting marked a significant step toward peaceful dialogue. The agreement was supported by regional partners and seen as a move toward long-term stability.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

This peace agreement is a positive and mature response to conflict. It shows that both nations are willing to prioritize diplomacy over violence. Choosing dialogue demonstrates strong leadership and sets a valuable example for the ASEAN region in managing disputes peacefully.

---

3. Do you think this agreement will work? Why or why not?

The agreement may work in the short term if both sides honor their commitments. However, long-term success depends on addressing deeper issues like border disputes, historical tensions, and national pride. Third-party mediation, such as by Malaysia or ASEAN, can help build trust and ensure that negotiations lead to lasting peace.

นาย สิริศักดิ์ 15 5/8

On July 28, 2025, Thai and Cambodian leaders held a joint press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, following five days of border clashes. Both sides agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence. The meeting marked a significant step toward peaceful dialogue. The agreement was supported by regional partners and seen as a move toward long-term stability.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

This peace agreement is a positive and mature response to conflict. It shows that both nations are willing to prioritize diplomacy over violence. Choosing dialogue demonstrates strong leadership and sets a valuable example for the ASEAN region in managing disputes peacefully.

3. Do you think this agreement will work? Why or why not?

The agreement may work in the short term if both sides honor their commitments. However, long-term success depends on addressing deeper issues like border disputes, historical tensions, and national pride. Third-party mediation, such as by Malaysia or ASEAN, can help build trust and ensure that negotiations lead to lasting peace.

น.ส ศศิวิมล ล่องอำไพ เลขที่39 ม.5/8

2.I think the peace agreement is a good step. It helps to reduce violence and protect innocent people. Both countries can now focus on peaceful solutions instead of fighting.

3.Yes, I think it can work if both sides respect the agreement and continue to communicate. Trust and cooperation are important. But if either side breaks the promise, the conflict might start again.

Sutida Boonchart M.5/8 No 33

2.I think this is a good agreement because nothing is more worse than a war, in my opinion.

3.I'm not sure about this will work or not, but anything that isn't a war is always a good option for me. I dont want to see Thai people die anymore.

Atichart Khangrang M.5/8 No.9

In the video, two countries have been in conflict for many years. Leaders from both sides met to discuss peace. After long negotiations, they agreed to stop fighting and work together. The peace agreement includes sharing resources and protecting civilians. Many people hope this will bring lasting peace to the region.

2. My opinion:

I think this peace agreement is a good step forward. It shows that both sides are willing to solve their problems without violence. Peace is always better than war, and this agreement gives people hope.

3. Will it work?

I believe it can work if both sides truly commit to it. Trust must be rebuilt slowly, and actions must follow words. If they support each other and keep their promises, the agreement can succeed.

Miss Pitchada Sripanya M.5/8 No.31

1. This video is a joint press conference held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, concerning a ceasefire agreement between Thailand and Cambodia. Key points include an immediate ceasefire, plans for military meetings and a General Border Committee meeting, coordination by Malaysia, and the resumption of direct communications between the involved countries. The conference also highlighted the humanitarian impact of the conflict.

2.The ceasefire agreement between Thailand and Cambodia, announced in Kuala Lumpur, is a significant step towards peace. The immediate ceasefire, plans for military and border committee meetings, and resumed direct communications are positive signs of progress. Support from Malaysia, the U.S., and China underscores the necessary international cooperation. Crucially, genuine adherence to the agreement and clear verification mechanisms are vital to ensure lasting peace and address the issue of displaced persons.

3.Perhaps because there were too many losses, there could be conflicts within the country.

1.

On July 28, 2025, Thai and Cambodian leaders held a joint press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, following five days of border clashes. Both sides agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence. The meeting marked a significant step toward peaceful dialogue. The agreement was supported by regional partners and seen as a move toward long-term stability.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

This peace agreement is a positive and mature response to conflict. It shows that both nations are willing to prioritize diplomacy over violence. Choosing dialogue demonstrates strong leadership and sets a valuable example for the ASEAN region in managing disputes peacefully.

---

3. Do you think this agreement will work? Why or why not?

The agreement may work in the short term if both sides honor their commitments. However, long-term success depends on addressing deeper issues like border disputes, historical tensions, and national pride. Third-party mediation, such as by Malaysia or ASEAN, can help build trust and ensure that negotiations lead to lasting peace.

นางสาว กรกนก 26 5/8

• Mr Jinna Intabut No.2 Class 5/8

2.I think this peace agreement is a good step. It shows that both countries want to stop the fighting and protect their people. Peace is always better than war.

3.I think it can work if both sides follow the agreement. They must trust each other and not start fighting again. If they really want peace, it will be possible

Apirak Thatjumnong 5/8 10

On July 28, 2025, Thai and Cambodian leaders held a joint press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, following five days of border clashes. Both sides agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence. The meeting marked a significant step toward peaceful dialogue. The agreement was supported by regional partners and seen as a move toward long-term stability.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

This peace agreement is a positive and mature response to conflict. It shows that both nations are willing to prioritize diplomacy over violence. Choosing dialogue demonstrates strong leadership and sets a valuable example for the ASEAN region in managing disputes peacefully.

---

3. Do you think this agreement will work? Why or why not?

The agreement may work in the short term if both sides honor their commitments. However, long-term success depends on addressing deeper issues like border disputes, historical tensions, and national pride. Third-party mediation, such as by Malaysia or ASEAN, can help build trust and ensure that negotiations lead to lasting peace.

นางสาวใฝ่ฝัน ไพรบึง ม.5/8 เลขที่27

2. I think the peace agreement is a positive and necessary step toward ending violence and rebuilding trust between the two nations. It shows that dialogue and diplomacy can work even in tense situations.

3. It might work in the short term if both sides stay committed. However, since there were past violations, it depends on how honest and transparent both governments are. If they allow independent monitoring and avoid provocation, the agreement has a better chance of success.

นาย อดิศร สุภนิกร เลขที่22 ม.5/8

1.2) During the conference, both countries announced an immediate and unconditional ceasefire along the contested frontier.

1.3) The leaders emphasized their shared desire to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence.

1.4) Officials described the ceasefire as a critical step toward restoring stability and enabling dialogue.

1.5)They reaffirmed a commitment to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each nation.

2.)True and lasting peace requires transparency, mutual trust, and public involvement. Agreements made only at the leadership level can be fragile if they lack support or understanding from the people.

3.)It has the potential to work — but only if both countries follow through with real actions, not just words. A ceasefire can stop the violence temporarily, but if the root causes of the conflict are not addressed, such as border disputes or nationalism, the peace won’t last.

name: prachayada jantaratch

class: 5/8

no. 32

1. On July 28, 2025, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim hosted peace talks between Thailand and Cambodia.

2. Both countries agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, effective at midnight that day.

3. Under the agreement, military commanders would reestablish direct communication and appoint liaison officers to manage border coordination.

4. The fighting in the days before the ceasefire involved heavy weaponry and led to at least 38–43 deaths and the displacement of over 300,000 civilians.

5. Despite the ceasefire, Thailand accused Cambodia of multiple violations, claiming it responded only in self-defense.

6. ASEAN and Malaysia plan to send monitoring teams and facilitate a review meeting scheduled for August 4.

7. Leaders from both sides expressed hope that this agreement would reduce tensions and allow displaced civilians to return safely.

Thoughts on the Peace Agreement

The peace agreement is an important first step toward ending the recent conflict, especially after days of intense border fighting. However, it’s only a temporary ceasefire with no concrete resolution on underlying issues like territorial disputes or historical grievances. The inclusion of ASEAN and Malaysia as mediators shows regional commitment, and U.S. diplomatic pressure also played a role in prompting the deal.

It is a symbolic but fragile gesture—useful for de-escalation but lacking long-term guarantees or enforcement mechanisms.

Will the Agreement Be Effective? Why or Why Not?

It may work temporarily, but it’s unlikely to bring lasting peace without deeper solutions.

• Lack of structural change: The agreement does not address the root causes of the conflict, such as border demarcation disputes.

• Distrust remains: Multiple reports of ceasefire violations suggest both sides remain suspicious and defensive.

• External pressure may fade: U.S. and ASEAN influence helped push the ceasefire, but if international focus shifts, compliance may weaken.

Nalin Kusonsanong No.29 M.5/9

1. What happened?

In late July 2025, a deadly border clash broke out between Thailand and Cambodia. Hundreds of thousands were displaced. Both sides agreed to a ceasefire starting at midnight on July 28, with Malaysia as mediator.

2. Will the “midnight ceasefire” and “peace deal” work?

• Setting a clear ceasefire time (midnight) helps reduce confusion and allows preparation

• But success depends on trust and serious cooperation

• Reports of violations suggest outside monitoring is still needed

3. Final opinion

The deal is a good short-term solution to stop violence. But without long-term plans and transparency, fighting could return.

Kanwara Lerthiranviboon 27 5/9

The video talks about a peace meeting between Thailand, Cambodia, and Malaysia after a border conflict. Leaders from all three countries met in Kuala Lumpur and agreed to a ceasefire. The fighting had caused tension and problems along the Thai-Cambodian border. They promised to stop using violence and solve issues through peaceful talks. They also planned for better future cooperation and trust. A press conference was held to update the public. It looked like a serious attempt to end the conflict.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think it’s a good step. At least the leaders are trying to solve the problem through talking, not fighting. That’s better for everyone.

3. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

It might work if all sides really try to keep the peace. But if they don’t follow through, things could go wrong again. It depends on their actions, not just words.

Anuntaya Parnthong 5/9 No.40

I think the peace agreement is a good and necessary step. It shows both countries want to avoid more violence and protect their people.

I believe it might work if both sides stay committed and keep communication open. Without trust and follow-through, it could fall apart again.

พงศกร ฟิลม 5/9 เลขที่4

1. Following deadly clashes along the Thailand–Cambodia border—which resulted in at least 35 deaths and the displacement of over 260,000 people—both nations agreed to a “unconditional ceasefire”.

2. The peace deal was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with heavy diplomatic pressure from the U.S., where former President Donald Trump warned of trade sanctions if the conflict continued.

3. The ceasefire took effect at midnight on the day of the announcement. Military leaders from both sides plan to meet and reduce tensions, and a formal border committee meeting is scheduled for August 4 in Cambodia.

4. Both governments expressed hope that the truce would allow displaced civilians to return home and rebuild trust between the nations.

5. However, analysts warned that the situation remains fragile due to long-standing territorial disputes and historical tensions between the countries.

Opinion on the Peace Agreement

The peace agreement is a positive step, especially in halting the immediate violence and civilian suffering. It shows how diplomatic and economic pressure, especially from regional players and global powers like the U.S., can still be effective in brokering peace. The involvement of Malaysia highlights the importance of regional leadership in Southeast Asia.

🤔

Do I think the agreement will work? Why or why not?

Yes—in the short term. The ceasefire appears to be effective for now, especially in preventing further escalation and allowing humanitarian relief.

However, for the long term, its success is uncertain.

• The root causes of the conflict (such as unresolved border issues and political tensions) are not yet addressed.

• There is fragility in trust between the two nations, and any misstep could lead to renewed conflict.

• Without continued dialogue, monitoring mechanisms, and regional cooperation, this ceasefire could be temporary.

So, while the peace deal works as a temporary solution, more work is needed to ensure lasting peace.

Let me know if you need this turned into a paragraph format or for use in a speech or assignment!

Patrawat hirunwong no.5 5/9

Opinion on the peace agreement:

This peace agreement is a positive step toward resolving the conflict without violence. It shows that dialogue and cooperation can help bring peace.

Do you think the agreement will work? Why or why not?

Yes, the agreement could work if both sides stay committed and cooperate with the monitoring team. However, if there is a lack of trust or violations occur, the conflict may return.

KwinThra Thomgsom No.10 M.5/9

2.I think this peace agreement is a very good first step. Ending violence is important, and this shows that both sides are willing to talk. It

3.I think it might work if both sides truly commit to it. Trust is hard to rebuild after so many years of war.

2.I think this peace agreement is a positive sign and a crucial step towards de-escalating tensions between Cambodia and Thailand. The fact that both sides could agree to an immediate ceasefire demonstrates a clear desire to find a resolution and mitigate the impact on their populations.

3.I believe this agreement has a good chance of working, but its success will ultimately depend on concrete and earnest implementation by both sides. My reasons for this outlook are:

• Urgent Need: The video highlights a substantial number of displaced people, indicating an urgent need to end the conflict, which may compel both parties to uphold the agreement.

Chalermpong 5/9 no.8

2.I strongly disagree because Cambodia has violated the agreement first on many occasions and in various ways.

3.The agreement was ineffective because Cambodia failed to uphold the ceasefire as agreed

2.I agree, as it is a very significant and positive first step in resolving the prolonged conflict that often leads to violent deaths.

3.This peace agreement is likely to be effective in the short term for reducing violence, as it has been signed by leaders, enjoys international support, and includes concrete measures.

Natthawat Bunruang M.5/9 No.11

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim acted as the moderator.

Representatives from Thailand and Cambodia attended.

Observers from the United States and China were present.

Both sides agreed to an immediate ceasefire.

Troop withdrawal and joint monitoring were also agreed upon.

The deal marks a key first step toward lasting p

eace.

2)I feel that it's good to have this peace agreement because it brings peace to the country.

3)I think it might be effective because there is a joint monitoring committee and other countries served as witnesses to this agreement.

2.We should not use violence to solve problems; instead, we should negotiate and use reason.

3.It might work if everyone follows the agreement and it will be beneficial for both countries.

2. Opinion on the peace agreement:
I think the peace agreement is a positive step toward ending the conflict. It shows that both sides are willing to talk and solve problems peacefully. This agreement gives hope to people who have suffered for many years.

3. Will it work? Why or why not?
It might work if both sides stay committed and honest. If they follow through with the promises and focus on helping the people, peace can last. However, if one side breaks the agreement, the conflict could return.

2. The peace deal was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with heavy diplomatic pressure from the U.S., where former President Donald Trump warned of trade sanctions if the conflict continued.

3. The ceasefire took effect at midnight on the day of the announcement. Military leaders from both sides plan to meet and reduce tensions, and a formal border committee meeting is scheduled for August 4 in Cambodia.

4. Both governments expressed hope that the truce would allow displaced civilians to return home and rebuild trust between the nations.

5. However, analysts warned that the situation remains fragile due to long-standing territorial disputes and historical tensions between the countries.

Matawan Pechtan 5/9 36

2.)I agree because Thailand will return to peace.

3.)It might be effective if Cambodia does not violate the agreement.

2.I think it’s great that Thailand and Cambodia have made peace. Talking is always better than fighting. Now they can work together and help each other. This agreement will make life better for people. I hope their friendship continues

3.I think this agreement can work if both countries keep respecting each other and continue to talk. Peace needs effort from both sides, so if they stay patient and cooperate, the agreement will be successful. It’s important they solve problems peacefully and help each other grow

นายรัตนพงศ์ ประชุมจิต ชั้นม.5/9 เลขที่14

2. The peace deal was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with heavy diplomatic pressure from the U.S., where former President Donald Trump warned of trade sanctions if the conflict continued.

3. The ceasefire took effect at midnight on the day of the announcement. Military leaders from both sides plan to meet and reduce tensions, and a formal border committee meeting is scheduled for August 4 in Cambodia.

4. Both governments expressed hope that the truce would allow displaced civilians to return home and rebuild trust between the nations.

5. However, analysts warned that the situation remains fragile due to long-standing territorial disputes and historical tensions between the countries.

นายชยุตเดช แสงอินทร์ เลขที่20 5/9

Language Barriers Thai and Khmer languages are different, leading to misinterpretations. Historical DisputesConflicts over borders (e.g., Preah Vihear Temple) can escalate if not managed well.

Political Miscommunication Diplomatic tensions may arise from unclear statements

displacement. Both countries agreed to:

-An immediate ceasefire starting at midnight

-Troop withdrawal from the conflict zone

-A joint monitoring committee to oversee the ceasefire

-Support for civilian resettlement

The agreement was signed in a formal ceremony, with international witnesses from the U.S. and China. Leaders from both countries—Thailand’s Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodia’s Hun Manet—expressed commitment to peace and rebuilding trust. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim led the mediation as ASEAN’s representative.

It could work, but there are challenges

Why it might succeed:

-Both leaders publicly committed to peace

-International pressure and involvement from powerful countries

-A monitoring team is planned to ensure both sides follow the deal

Doubts:

-Long-standing mistrust may still exist

-No clear enforcement if one side breaks the deal

-Local forces might act independently of government orders

Conclusion: The agreement is a positive first step, but success depends on continued cooperation, monitoring, and mutual trust.

ผลิตโชค จันทองแท้ 5/9 15

2.It's important to use logical thinking to solve problems.

3.I believe this agreement has a good chance of working, but its success will ultimately depend on concrete and earnest implementation by both sides. My reasons for this outlook are:

• Urgent Need: The video highlights a substantial number of displaced people, indicating an urgent need to end the conflict, which may compel

both

The clashes continued from late into the early morning.

The situation on the Thai-Cambodian border appeared to be improving after the Thai Army commander met with the Cambodian military commander on July 29, 2015, to reach a mutually agreed-upon ceasefire and troop movement ban pending the GBC meeting on August 4, 2015.

However, late that same day, clashes broke out in the Phu Makhuea and Chong An Ma areas. The Royal Thai Army reported that there had been an armed clash on July 29, 2015, during the night.

Tinnaphop keereerat no.1 m.5/9

2. The peace deal was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with heavy diplomatic pressure from the U.S., where former President Donald Trump warned of trade sanctions if the conflict continued.

3. The ceasefire took effect at midnight on the day of the announcement. Military leaders from both sides plan to meet and reduce tensions, and a formal border committee meeting is scheduled for August 4 in Cambodia.

4. Both governments expressed hope that the truce would allow displaced civilians to return home and rebuild trust between the nations.

5. However, analysts warned that the situation remains fragile due to long-standing territorial disputes and historical tensions between the countries.

Buchanan 31 5/9

2.Peace is important because it prevents violence, protects lives, and helps countries build a better future together.

3.I think the agreement can work if both sides stay committed and the monitoring team works effectively. Trust and cooperation are the keys to success.

2.The peace deal was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with heavy diplomatic pressure from the U.S., where former President Donald Trump warned of trade sanctions if the conflict continued.

3.The ceasefire took effect at midnight on the day of the announcement. Military leaders from both sides plan to meet and reduce tensions, and a formal border committee meeting is scheduled for August 4 in Cambodia.

4.Both governments expressed hope that the truce would allow displaced civilians to return home and rebuild trust between the nations.

5.However, analysts warned that the situation remains fragile due to long-standing territorial disputes and historical tensions between the countries.

Peerawit Panomai 5/9 No.23

1. Summary (5–7 sentences):Two high-level representatives from Thailand and Cambodia met in Kuala Lumpur to hold a joint press conference. They stepped forward to address the media, announcing a new peace agreement and an immediate ceasefire. Leaders emphasized de-escalation and the restoration of peace along their shared border. Reporters from both countries attended and asked questions about implementation. The atmosphere was formal but hopeful. This marked the first public, coordinated effort in months to tackle border clashes.

2. What I think about this peace agreement:This agreement appears to be a positive and timely initiative. It signals willingness from both sides to dialogue and invest in peaceful resolution.

3. Do I think it will work? Why or why not?It could succeed if both countries genuinely commit to the ceasefire and follow through with agreed-upon measures. However, lasting peace will depend on trust-building, transparency, and effective monitoring mechanisms.

นาย ภาคิน ม่วงศรีจันทร์ เลขที่6

2. The peace deal was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, with heavy diplomatic pressure from the U.S., where former President Donald Trump warned of trade sanctions if the conflict continued.

3. The ceasefire took effect at midnight on the day of the announcement. Military leaders from both sides plan to meet and reduce tensions, and a formal border committee meeting is scheduled for August 4 in Cambodia.

4. Both governments expressed hope that the truce would allow displaced civilians to return home and rebuild trust between the nations.

5. However, analysts warned that the situation remains fragile due to long-standing territorial disputes and historical tensions between the countries.

Leaders from Thailand and Cambodia joined peace talks led by Malaysia. They agreed to a ceasefire starting at midnight. Thailand called for troop withdrawal and joint monitoring. Cambodia supported the plan, hoping to rebuild trust. The agreement was signed with U.S. and China as witnesses.

2. Opinion on the Agreement:

It’s a good step toward peace. Both sides show willingness to stop the conflict and work together.

3. Will it work? Why or why not?

It could work if both countries follow the agreement. International support and monitoring will help keep them on track.

Pakapon Sengpracha M.5/9 No.12

In the video, representatives of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda sign a peace agreement brokered by the United States. Former President Trump appears and delivers remarks about the significance of the deal. Both countries pledge to uphold territorial integrity and to end hostilities. The ceremony takes place in a formal setting with dignitaries onstage. Audience members applaud as leaders shake hands and sign documents. The event is hailed as a turning point toward resolving long‑standing tensions. Observers describe it as a historic moment in regional diplomacy .

2. What I think about this peace agreement

I think this peace agreement is a meaningful and courageous effort. It shows political will from both Congo and Rwanda to resolve conflict through dialogue rather than force. It also reflects constructive international involvement to encourage stability and cooperation.

3. Will it work? Why or why not?

I think it might succeed if both countries follow through consistently. Success depends on real implementation of the terms and ongoing trust-building. However, lasting peace will require continued oversight and engagement, because unresolved grievances or mistrust could undermine the agreement over time.

Name Jirapat sirisom 5/9 n.3

The video shows the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia standing together in Kuala Lumpur on July 28, 2025, announcing an “immediate and unconditional” ceasefire after five days of intense border fighting. They are flanked by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who facilitated the talks . The agreement followed clashes that killed more than 40 people and displaced over 300,000 residents . Both sides promised to halt hostilities, stop troop movements, and repatriate casualties . The United States and China participated diplomatically, with U.S. President Donald Trump leveraging trade negotiations to encourage peace . The video captures a historic gesture of dialogue amid regional pressure and humanitarian crisis.

---

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think this agreement is an important and hopeful first step. It shows both countries are willing to negotiate and pause violence, while regional powers like Malaysia, the U.S., and China played constructive roles.

---

3. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

It could work if both sides adhere to the ceasefire, uphold military coordination, and allow international monitoring. However, initial reports of alleged violations and deep-rooted mistrust may undermine its effectiveness unless these issues are addressed promptly . ศตคุณ สมิงชัย มี.5/9 เลขที่17

Both countries showed a strong commitment to solving problems through peaceful means.

The meeting helped reduce tension and build mutual trust.

2.Yes, I do. Peace is better than war.

It helps both countries solve problems without violence.

People near the border will live more safely.

I support this peaceful agreement.

3.Yes, I agree because peace is better than fighting.

If both sides keep their promises, the border will be safer.

People can live without fear, and the countries can work together more.

It may also lead to better trade and stronger friendship in the future.

2. I think this agreement is important because it stops the fighting and helps people feel safe. It shows both countries want peace and cooperation.

3. I think it can work if both sides keep their promises and communicate well. But if they break the agreement, fighting might happen again.

Mr.Teetipat Maneepinit M.5/8 No.5

2)It is a good agreement to prevent further losses, so it is necessary to stop the conflict as soon as possible."

3)It might not work because Cambodia tends to act dishonestly, spreading lies and accusations against Thailand without sincerity. The truth has already come out, showing that they violated the agreement in bad faith."

Part 1: Opinion Writing

1. Short summary

In the video, Thailand and Cambodia had a conflict over their border area near the Preah Vihear Temple. There were clashes between the two countries, which caused damage and fear among people living near the border. Later, leaders from both sides met and discussed ways to stop the fighting. They agreed to sign a peace agreement to reduce tension and protect civilians. The agreement also included plans for joint border management. Both governments promised to work together peacefully. People in the area hoped that the situation would become more stable.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think this peace agreement is a very important step for both countries. It shows that they are willing to solve problems through dialogue instead of fighting. It also helps protect the people who live near the border.

3. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

I think it could work if both sides keep their promises and respect the agreement. If they continue to communicate and cooperate, the conflict can be reduced. However, if either side breaks the agreement, the problem may return.

Both countries agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire after days of border conflict.

Many people were killed or forced to leave their homes during the fighting.

Malaysia helped mediate the deal to stop the violence.

The international community welcomed the agreement as a step toward pe

ace.

2)I think this peace agreement is a very important and necessary step. It shows that both sides are willing to avoid more violence and protect innocent lives. I admire Malaysia’s effort to help their neighbors find a peaceful solution. The agreement also gives people in the conflict areas hope for safety and stability. It’s better to talk than to fight.

3)I think the agreement can work, but only if both sides are truly committed. If they break the ceasefire again, it will be hard to trust each other. They need to create a clear plan to solve their problems and let international groups help monitor the situation. Without strong cooperation, the same problems may happen again. Peace needs patience, trust, and honest dialogue.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

This peace agreement is a positive and mature response to conflict. It shows that both nations are willing to prioritize diplomacy over violence. Choosing dialogue demonstrates strong leadership and sets a valuable example for the ASEAN region in managing disputes peacefully.

3. Do you think this agreement will work? Why or why not?

The agreement may work in the short term if both sides honor their commitments. However, long-term success depends on addressing deeper issues like border disputes, historical tensions, and national pride. Third-party mediation, such as by Malaysia or ASEAN, can help build trust and ensure that negotiations lead to lasting peace.

Thailand called for an end to intrusion, violence, and loss of life.

Both sides agreed to an immediate ceasefire starting midnight on July 28.

Military meetings are set for July 29, and a GBC meeting on August 4.

Malaysia will act as coordinator and observer.

Thailand affirmed no loss of sovereignty, prioritizing civilian safety.

Miss Wanrada Paodan m.5/7 No.32

1. In the video, leaders from opposing groups came together to discuss a peace agreement. They signed a document promising to end the conflict and work towards cooperation. Both sides expressed hope for a better future. The community showed mixed reactions, with some feeling optimistic and others cautious. The video also highlighted efforts to rebuild trust and promote dialogue.

2. I think this peace agreement is an important step towards ending the conflict. It shows willingness from both sides to find common ground and create lasting peace. Such agreements can help reduce violence and improve the lives of many people affected by the conflict.

   
   3. I believe it could work if both parties remain committed and follow through on their promises. However, peace agreements often face challenges like lack of trust or external influences. Success depends on continuous communication, mutual respect, and support from the community and leaders.

Pornnapat Sangiamchit no. 37

In the video, it shows the conflict between Thailand and Cambodia near the Preah Vihear Temple. Both countries claimed ownership of the area, leading to military clashes. Several soldiers and civilians were injured or killed during the fighting. The video also shows the damage caused by the shelling and gunfire. After international pressure, the two sides agreed to a ceasefire and peace talks. The United Nations and ASEAN got involved to help reduce tensions. Eventually, both sides tried to resolve the issue peacefully through negotiations.

2. What do you think about this peace agreement?

I think the peace agreement is a good step because it helps stop the violence and saves lives. It also shows that both countries are willing to talk and solve problems without using weapons.

3. Do you think it will work? Why or why not?

I think it might work if both sides truly respect the agreement and continue peaceful discussions. However, if they don't trust each other or break the agreement, the fighting could happen again.

after peace talks in Putrajaya, Malaysia, hosted by PM Anwar Ibrahim.

U.S. and Chinese ambassadors joined the discussions.

Cambodia's PM Hun Manet called the meeting productive

and noted over 300,000 displaced people from both sides.

Further military and defense talks are planned to ensure lasting peace.

2. The goal is to set conditions for future bilateral discussions and the de-escalation of forces . Both the United States and China were in contact with the leaders of both countries to urge for a peaceful resolution .The presence and collaboration of all parties highlighted a shared commitment to peace, dialogue, and regional stability.

3.I think it will work . Because, The agreement, effective from midnight on July 28, 2025, is for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire.

On the morning of July 24, during reported clashes along the Thai-Cambodian border, social media circulated images of a crashed and burnt F-16 aircraft. Cambodian news outlets such as Khmer Times, DAP News, and a Facebook page with over 70,000 followers shared these images claiming that Cambodian forces shot down a Thai F-16 jet.

DAP News and Khmer Times both used images of a burning F-16 previously featured in Thai media (Khaosod) and falsely reported it as recent. These posts were later deleted.

Fact-checking confirms these images are unrelated to the current situation and are from older, unrelated incidents.

2. Viral Clips of Vultures Feeding on “Cambodian Soldiers” — Completely False

Social media users also shared videos showing large flocks of vultures flying in the sky, claiming they were feeding on dead Cambodian soldiers killed during the fighting. One outlet, The Room 44, posted such a video with captions like “Chilling! Flock of vultures and crows over battlefield.”

A Cambodian Facebook page, Army Media, claimed nearly 140 Thai soldiers were killed near Preah Vihear Temple, sharing images of corpses next to Thai flags — a post widely shared but unfounded.

Experts refuted the content:

• Dr. Thorn Thamrongnawasawat, marine biologist, stated that the vulture images were actually Himalayan brown vultures, not taken at the Thai-Cambodian border.

• COFACT and Dr. Petch Manopawitr, president of the Bird Conservation Society of Thailand, confirmed the clips were not from the region.

• The likelihood of such large vulture gatherings at the Thai-Cambodian border is “almost impossible” due to vultures being critically endangered in Cambodia.

Phasittha 10 5/7

This agreement aims to reduce tensions and prevent further clashes along the border.

Both sides agreed to increase communication and withdraw heavy weapons from conflict zones.

The ceasefire has already shown positive results, with no major violence reported overnight.

Thailand’s Second Army continues to monitor the situation and secure 11 key border areas.

Civilians on both sides are cooperating and helping report suspicious drone activity.

China and the United States are acting as observers to ensure transparency in the peace process.

Thailand is also preparing legal actions against Cambodia for attacks on Thai civilians.

The government urges the public to avoid fake news and rely on official sources.

Peace and stability remain the top priorities for both nations moving forward.

Raksina Nachaiboon No.22

2.The immediate ceasefire is a critical first step to saving lives and alleviating the suffering of over 300,000 displaced people.

3. The agreement between Thailand and Cambodia is likely to succeed if both sides focus on clear mutual benefits, such as trade, economic growth, and security. Building trust and maintaining stable diplomatic relations are crucial factors. Although the agreement may look promising on paper, it requires serious implementation and follow-up. Domestic political situations in either country may affect its continuity. External pressures can also influence the overall outcome. If these factors are well managed, the agreement has a high chance of success.

Thailand and Cambodia agreed on an immediate and unconditional ceasefire after five days of border clashes, aiming to reduce tensions and start further talks.

2. Opinion:

It’s an important first step to stop violence and open the door for peaceful negotiations.

3. Will it work?

It could work if both sides follow through, monitor the ceasefire, and keep talking — but without trust and enforcement, the conflict could return.

siwath jinda m.5/8 No.8

2. My opinion is that the handshake between Thailand and Cambodia to stop the fighting is extremely positive. I think it is a very important gesture because it not only officially ends the hostilities between the two countries but also shows a willingness to cooperate and resolve conflicts peacefully. This act of holding hands symbolizes mutual understanding, respect, and a commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the region. It can help prevent further violence, build trust, and create a foundation for long-term harmony and friendly relations between the nations.

3. From the video above, I think the negotiation and the announcement of an immediate and unconditional ceasefire are very positive. It helps reduce violence and prevents further harm to civilians. Moreover, the presence of representatives from ASEAN, the U.S., and China demonstrates transparency and international cooperation, which builds confidence that the agreement will be effective. Even though there may be occasional violations, sending observers to the border helps ensure compliance and promotes long-term peace and stability in the region.

Noppakhun Hongsub 11 5/8