[discussion topic goes here] by Melissa Tole

2025-03-26 13:04:29 UTC

Flynn's study from 1980 supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by seeing “visual images on television, in video games and ads”(Source 12). It shows that these helped them solve the visual puzzles in IQ tests, significantly increasing their IQ by an “average of about 3 IQ points each decade”.

4806822425 — 2025-03-26 13:04:43 UTC

Flynn’s study supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence because visual images that can be found in media help people in solving visual puzzles that can be found in IQ tests. (paragraph 12)

melissatole — 2025-03-26 13:05:03 UTC

The author uses Einstein as an example to challenge the idea that intelligence is fixed at birth by showing that environment influenced his skill. Since he was “slow to speak “ and “thrown out of school,” the author thinks “it certainly does not seem that he was” intelligent (Source 1 9). This detail emphasizes the fact that Einstein had to learn these skills, just like everyone else.

2025-03-26 13:05:06 UTC

hehehe

2025-03-26 13:05:34 UTC

The Flynn effect study supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence because it showed that IQ increased around the world, which was because of the "way humans are inundated with visual images" (source 1 p12).

2025-03-26 13:06:08 UTC

Flynns study supports the notion because visual images that nurture affects intelligent that are seen on the tv or online

2025-03-26 13:07:05 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980s suggests how humans are influenced by graphic and visual images such as T.V, video games, ads, etc. These visual images can affect people's IQ and make them smarter or more dumb.

2025-03-26 13:07:33 UTC

Flynn's study supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence. ANSWER The author states that IQ increased around the world, which was because of the way humans are immersed with visual images (S1 P12). ELABORATE

2025-03-26 13:08:21 UTC

The Flynn study shows that how kids are raised or their activities can impact their intelligence; more specifically, kids who watched TV or played video games were good at visual puzzles on IQ tests.

2025-03-26 13:08:44 UTC

The counterpoint argues against the fixed level of intelligence at birth, citing examples like Einstein, slow to speak as a child. The point is to emphasize the evolving of the brain over time. (Origin Of Intelligence, 8). The development of the brain is not dictated at birth or inheritance, rather it is up to the person to foster insight among their intelligence.

2025-03-26 13:08:44 UTC

Flynn's study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by seeing “visual images on television, in video games and ads”(Source 7). It shows that these helped them solve the visual puzzles in IQ tests, significantly increasing their IQ by an “average of about 3 IQ points each decade”(Source 7).

2025-03-26 13:09:16 UTC

Flynn’s study about change in IQ scores over time suggests that pictures and visual images help with IQ and intelligence, like the author says, “In other words, do not worry about all that time your kid brother spends playing Minecraft—it may be helping to boost his IQ” (paragraph 12). It suggests that internet time is not too much to be worrying about due to how it nurtures intelligence.

2025-03-26 13:09:30 UTC

Flynn study supports how the nature affect the world and how intelligence can be changed from birth and how you IQ can change(source 1).It also shows notation of visual images that nurture affects intelligent that are seen on tv or online (source 2)

2025-03-26 13:11:34 UTC

Flynn's study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by seeing "visual images on television, video games, and ads"(source 7). It shows that these helped them solve the visual puzzles in IQ tests, significantly increasing their IQ by an "average of about 3 IQ points each decade" (source 3) .

2025-03-26 13:11:42 UTC

Flynn study from the 1980s support the notion that nurture affects intelligence from such things that you look at every day. "Flynn effect was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads. He thought that these images assisted people in solving the sorts of visual puzzles found on IQ tests."( Source 12). These factors improved scores on IQ tests because of the different puzzles that video games, the tv, and ads have taught them.

2025-03-26 16:03:02 UTC

Flynn’s studies showed that IQ was steadily increasing around the world at an average rate of 3 IQ points each decade.

2025-03-26 16:03:11 UTC

Flynn study supports how the nature affect the world and how intelligence can be changed at birth

2025-03-26 16:03:12 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by showing that the more we grow up and are near technology, the more the average IQ goes up. ~~This is shown in paragraph 12 “~~~~1980s Flynn study, which found that~~ IQ was steadily increasing ~~around the world at an average~~ rate of 3 IQ points each decade. ~~Ulric Neisser of Cornell University posited that the so-called Flynn effect was due to the way humans are~~ inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads. “

The Flynn study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by showing that the more we grow up and are near technology, the more the average IQ goes up. In the Flynn Study, IQ rates increased "3 IQ! points per decade" as a result of " people being "inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads" introduced with television and radio (Source 1 12). One assumes this increase is due to the influx of media that was available after 1940s.

2025-03-26 16:03:16 UTC

Flynn's study supports the claim that nurture affects a child's intelligence. It shows how the more time went on and the more technology advanced iq raised.

2025-03-26 16:37:16 UTC

The Flynn study suggests that environmental factors contribute to intelligence growth. The text states that “Ulric Neisser of Cornell University posited that the so-called Flynn effect was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads.” This implies that exposure to certain stimuli in one’s environment can enhance cognitive abilities, supporting the idea that nurture plays a role in intelligence. (Source 1 paragraph 12)

4806003833 — 2025-03-26 16:37:27 UTC

Flynn's study supports the claim that nurture affect's a child's intelligence. It shows how the more time went on and the more technology advanced iq raised.

2025-03-26 16:37:45 UTC

Pineapple Tree

4806923506 — 2025-03-26 16:38:28 UTC

The Flynn study shows IQ increases 3 points each decade. It indicates that the more people that are inundated with visual images, video games, and ads the more likely people are to have a greater IQ.

2025-03-26 16:38:35 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by showing that IQ was “steadily increasing” at an “rate of 3 IQ points each decade.” This relates the rise of exposure to “visual images on television, in video games, and in ads” to the growth in IQ over time. (Source 1, Paragraph 12)

2025-03-26 16:38:44 UTC

The Flynn Study supports that there was an increase on IQ and an average of 3 points each decade. It explains " increasing around the world at an average rate of 3 IQ points each decade" (p.12). This elaborates to there has been a changed compared to decades ago.

4804289657 — 2025-03-26 16:39:56 UTC

The flynn study supports that notion that nurture affects intelligence due to its suggestion that the incorporation of visual images into the media has "steadily increas[ed] around the world at an average rate of 3 IQ points each decade"(paragraph 12) due to their similarity to the questions on the iq tests.

2025-03-26 16:40:09 UTC

The Flynn study supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence because it is shown that as we grow older along technology our IQ goes up as well. The Flynn study states that “ A Flynn study in the 1980s found that the IQ was steadily increasing around the world at an average rate of 3 iq points." (13)

2025-03-26 16:42:06 UTC

The Flynn's study supports the claim that nurture affects a child's intelligence. Since the 1940s, technology advancements have caused IQ to go up. For example, one person interpreted the study, saying "that the so-called Flynn effect was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads” (S1 P12). This interpretation shows that exposure to certain technology in a person's environment can enhance thinking skills, supporting the idea that nurture plays a significant role in intelligence.

2025-03-26 16:42:46 UTC

The Flynn study suggests that the amount of nurture a child gets, affects the child's IQ. As children moved into wealthier and higher intelligent households, their IQ went up as well. Paragraph 11 says “...improved their IQ scores dramatically when they received high-quality day care from the age of three months on.” Although it is a factor of IQ, it doesn't mean that a child's IQ can't increase on its own.

2025-03-26 18:46:54 UTC

The Flynn Study, developed in the 1980s, can support the fact that intelligence is based on how someone was nurtured. "[Ulric Neisser had thought the Flynn effect was because of] visual images on television, video games, and in ads. He thought [it would help others solve] the sorts of visual puzzles found in IQ tests" (paragraph 12). This can help formulate the fact that humans can develop intelligence based on what they've seen throughout their life therefore supporting the Flynn Study.

2025-03-27 11:35:27 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980s says that the environment can affect the IQ growth of a person by saying that the Flynn effect was due to the way “humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads.” (source 1 paragraph 12) this shows that a person's environment can increase their abilities, showing the idea that your environment can affect your intelligence.

4806013757 — 2025-03-27 11:38:37 UTC

The 1980s Flynn study supports the argument that nurture affects intelligence by emphasizing the growth of offspring IQ overtime with the use of visual images. The author details that “visual images on television, in video games, and in ads,” commonly used today, had “images that assisted people in solving the sorts of visual puzzles found on IQ tests” (S1 P12). This further enhances the author’s argument by noting the fact that children can improve their IQ scores with games being used in their environment, or nurturing.

2025-03-27 11:42:48 UTC

the flynn study suggests that there has been a change in IQ over the years.IQ is changing at a steady rate for the past 30 years!.my evidence for this statement is ''found that IQ was steadily increasing around the world at an average rate of 3 IQ points each decade''.this evidence proves my statement that IQ is growing correct!hope this answer suited correctly!

2025-03-27 11:43:04 UTC

The Flynn's study supports the claim that nurture affects a child's intelligence and shows how the IQ changed after time had passed. This concept was interpreted by “Ulric Neisser of Cornell University," who said it "was due to the way humans were inundated with visual images from different technologies" (Source 1 12). This suggestion shows that a person's exposure to technology in a person's environment can enhance thinking skills, further proving that nurture has a role in intelligence.

2025-03-27 11:43:59 UTC

They flynn study shows that the amount of nurture that kid gets affects the children's IQ. He states "A fascinating study that supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence is the 1980s Flynn study, which found that IQ was steadily increasing around the world at an average rate of 3 IQ points each decade. " This explains that kids IQ increases by 3 IQ points with the amount of nurture they get.

2025-03-27 11:45:54 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980’s supports the notion that nature affects intelligence because the study demonstrated that IQ increased at an average rate of 3 points every decade due to the experiences they have daily. +The socalled Flynn effect was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads.” (source 1, paragraph 12) This shows that our experiences and environment can increase our intelligence.

4804244938 — 2025-03-27 11:47:17 UTC

The Flynn study suggests that people's IQs increased over time because "humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads." (source 1, 12) The Flynn study clearly shows that as the years go on and technology increases, people's IQs also increase.

4804292304 — 2025-03-27 11:48:51 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence by describing the overall growth of children's IQ over a long period of time with the use of a graph. The text goes into detail about how the media can change and influence the youth by helping them in solving visual puzzles (Source 1 Paragraph 12). The fact that children were given more opportunities to solve puzzles and watch media has been suggested as the cause of IQ.

4804393798 — 2025-03-27 11:51:39 UTC

The 1980s study, the Flynn effect, supports the idea that nurture affects intelligence by discovering that every decade, intelligence around the world is increased by an average of 3 points (source 1 paragraph 12). Interestingly, Ulric Neisser of Cornell University suggested that, "...this was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads"(source 1 paragraph 12). His belief was based on the increase in online media along with a rising popularity in advertisements, which correlates with IQ tests' content, they see these things so often that people are achieving higher scores on the IQ tests.

2025-03-27 11:56:22 UTC

2025-03-27 11:59:26 UTC

The Flynn study suggest that nurture affects people intelligence by showing that the average IQ was increased by 3 every decade. As Ulric Neisser says " the so-called Flynn effect was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads"(S1 P12). This suggestion shows that with the more resources that people had they were able to get higher IQs.

4804230585 — 2025-03-27 13:01:05 UTC

during the 1980s the Flynn study created the Flynn effect which lead to the notion that nurture affect intelligence. "This was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads". (paragraph 12) these images assisted people participating in IQ test. Basically as the world move to a more digital approach and more technological advances are developed people's IQ will increase.

4806968425 — 2025-03-27 13:14:24 UTC

The Flynn study from the 1980s supports the notion that nurture affects intelligence. When describing the overall growth of children's IQ over a long period of time with the use of a graph, the text goes into detail about how the media can change and influence the youth by helping them in solving visual puzzles (Source 1 Paragraph 12). Throughout the years technology increases and so do people IQ.

2025-03-27 13:26:53 UTC

With the higher scores does not directly correlate to the iq score. It says in the passage"scores do not mean everything and iq is not just based on test".

2025-03-27 13:28:19 UTC

Positive outcomes associated with higher IQ scores include higher grades, income, and more happiness and satisfaction in your life. (p 13, flyn study)

2025-03-27 13:28:33 UTC

Some positive outcomes of a higher IQ score may include things like better grades, increased happiness, and increased satisfaction (Source 2, p13). The correlation between these outcomes and high IQ help make the case for more media and games.

2025-03-27 13:29:35 UTC

High IQs are associated with positive outcomes such as good grades, income, personal satisfaction, and happiness. The author counters this by arguing against a deterministic view of intelligence, highlighting the potential for improvement through rich educational experiences. (Source 1, P14). The argument depicts the truth behind assuming intelligence based on social class and genetics as one of the main points of the article is the concept that intelligence is developed rather than started out with.

2025-03-27 13:33:02 UTC

With the higher scores we may get better grads and positive iqs the information from source (2,p13). It all results in better jobs grades and income,

2025-03-27 13:34:26 UTC

Possible positive outcomes accosiated with higher IQ are getting personal satisfaction and happiness from good grades(paragraph 13).

2025-03-27 13:37:38 UTC

With the higher scores does not directly correlate to the iq score. It says in the passage "scores do not mean everything and iq is not just based on test".

2025-03-27 13:37:39 UTC

High IQ are associated with positive outcomes such as good grades income personal satisfaction and happiness. The author counters this by saying deterministic view of intelligence highlighting potential for improvement through rich educational experiences (S1, P14). The argument depicts the truth behind assuming intelligence based on social class and genetics.

2025-03-27 13:37:42 UTC

2025-03-27 14:23:44 UTC

The author uses the flynn study to show the notion that the Flynn effect was due to the way humans are inundated with visual images on television, in video games, and in ads. . He thought that these images assisted people in solving the sorts of visual puzzles found on IQ tests. paragraph(12) Basically as the world move to a more digital approach and more technological advances are developed people's IQ will increase.

4804280908 — 2025-03-27 14:38:09 UTC

Charles Darwin viewed the role of intelligence and genetics as critical to survival. Darwin says that "the ability to learn was a key of natural selection" (source 1 paragraph 1). IQ is something that everyone has and you have to apply yourself to gain the knowledge that you want to learn.

melissatole — 2025-03-27 14:46:42 UTC

Charles Darwin viewed the role of genetics and intelligence as something that is needed for natural selection. He thought that “those who learned best survived” (S1 P2). Basically, learning is what causes people to live longer.

melissatole — 2025-03-27 14:58:36 UTC

melissatole — 2025-03-27 15:32:50 UTC

What does the passage suggest about the correlation between different types of intelligence tests?

2025-03-27 15:36:05 UTC

The passage suggests that there is a positive correlation between different types of intelligence test. The author says that when taking an IQ test like a verbal test, if you perform well on that test, then you could pass the other IQ tests, but if you perform poorly, then you are most likely to perform poorly on the other IQ tests (S1 P6). This correlation supports the idea that genetics are more responsible for intelligence than enviornment.

2025-03-27 15:36:57 UTC

IQ tests and vervale texts are both difficult verbal test you may find easier because you just have to say it.

2025-03-27 15:40:13 UTC

flynns study sopports the notion because visual images that nurture affects intelligence.

4804450676 — 2025-03-27 16:23:21 UTC

The Flynn study supports the nurture notion. The graph conveys information about the growth of children's IQ. Interpretations of the study discuss that media, such as videos and television, can include visual puzzles that help influence children to solve them as they watch (Source 1 Paragraph 12). These interpretations further support the notion of nurture affecting intelligence because children learn by puzzles instead of getting IQ genetically.

2025-03-27 16:30:42 UTC

There are different types of IQ tests and if test taker performs well in a verbal test then they are most likely to perform well on a memory test as well. However if someone's does poorly on a test then they are most likely to do poorly on the other tests as well. (Paragraph 6) This shows that different people are good at different things.

2025-03-27 16:32:30 UTC

The passage suggests that intelligence correlates to being better at different types of intelligence test. For example, "...those who performs well in a verbal test is likely to perform well on a spatial or memory test" (source 2 p6). In other words, the tests show intelligence is more innate than caused by environment.

4806881274 — 2025-03-27 16:33:33 UTC

The study suggest that most test that focuses on intelligence correlates really well as shown by "For example, a test-taker who performs well in a verbal test is likely to perform well on a spatial or memory test. A test-taker who performs poorly on a spatial test is likely to perform poorly on a memory or verbal test."(source 1, par.6).This statement demonstrates that "most tests correlate well" because it describes a general trend where individuals who perform well on one type of test tend to perform well on other types of tests, indicating a shared underlying cognitive ability that influences performance across different test categories; essentially, a high score on one test is a good predictor of a high score on another test. Another example for a sentence that mention correlation between test's is " So not only are you given a test that examines multiple intelligences, but you are also given a test whose various components correlate well." (source 1, par.6). A test that assesses multiple intelligences and shows strong correlations between its components suggests that these seemingly diverse abilities are not entirely separate but rather are influenced by a common underlying factor, supporting the concept of a general intelligence or "g" factor.

2025-03-27 16:40:41 UTC

Expert Ulric Neisser of Cornell University believes that this is because of the way we interact with technology (source 1, paragraph 12)

2025-03-27 16:43:51 UTC

The passage suggests that the correlation between different types of intelligence tests is that tests measuring intelligence in different ways often share similar scores. "who performs well in a verbal test is likely to perform well on a spatial/memory test" (source 2 page 6). This statement says that if someone performs well on one test, they are likely going to perform well on others, because total intelligence is innate rather than caused by outside factors.

2025-03-27 16:44:14 UTC

(EDITED)

"As Darwin suggested, intelligence deals with our ability to learn from experience and to adapt our behavior accordingly. Those of us with “good” genes—parents and grandparents with high IQs—arrive on the planet with an advantage. Whether or not we make the most of that advantage is, of course, up to us." (Paragraph 7, source one) So you seem, what this teaches us is that us humans are ALWAYS adapting, we need to learn how to embrace that and to impact that to our lives.

That's all for me, stay in the thick of it my brothers and sisters and s-s-samurai slice that like button

4806881274 — 2025-03-27 16:49:07 UTC

The author uses Einstein as an example to challenge the idea of fixed intelligence at birth as " Considering that Einstein was slow to speak as a child and was thrown out of school at one point, it certainly does not seem that he was. If your level of intelligence were fixed at birth, why couldn’t you read or drive a car as a toddler" (source 2, par. 2). This sentence the example of Albert Einstein to argue against the idea that intelligence is fixed at birth by pointing out that he exhibited developmental delays early on, including slow speech and being expelled from school, which contradicts the notion that his high level of intelligence would have been evident from a young age. If intelligence were fixed, he wouldn't have been able to learn abilities like reading or driving a car as a toddler. This demonstrates that intelligence is not static and develops over time through learning and experience, rather than being solely determined by genetics at birth.

2025-03-27 16:50:14 UTC

Charles Darwin viewed the role of intelligence and genetics as critical to survival. Darwin says that "the ability to learn was a key of natural selection" source 1 paragraph 1. IQ is something that everyone has and you have to apply yourself to gain the knowledge that you want to learn. So this means that Charles Darwin has IQ.