I closely associated this article with the Globalization Project because companies are choosing their rights over the rights of the workers. There was no mention of a government influence, which reinforces the idea of development as a private undertaking. 

This is a perfect example of Foreign Direct Investment that works. IBM didn’t just see a cheaper labor force, but saw a market that could benefit the community around them. A lot of projects that stem from IBM are centered around giving back to the community.

 This makes me think of Foreign Direct Investment, but in a negative light. The biggest interest for China to help Russia is to get the oil they have. North Korea used FDIs too much, and are now hyper dependent on Chinese aid, just how the sociological perspective on FDIs predicted.

In the short term, sharing clothes with those that needed it was a great help, however, the markets have been flooded. This is a great example of FDIs gone wrong; East Africa cannot escape the dependency imposed on them by the west. 

Keynes would love this plan. His idea about using government spending to boost aggregate demand is what the Trump Administration is trying to do. Keynes wanted to see the state actively participate in the economy, which is exactly what Trump is trying to do by reinstating the Ex-Im Bank.