<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Ask the Commission by Domagoj Morić</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-03-16 13:13:32 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-03-26 08:31:49 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Are the deadlines (11 and 20 May) safe?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1315865321</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-16 14:22:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1315865321</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Calls and start dates</title>
         <author>ungdom_ufs</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1315869943</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I foresee that we might not be able to have contracts ready for the beneficiaries before the start dates for the projects of both ESC and E+-youth. Would you advise us to put this on our website so the applicants can take this in to account when they plan their starts date?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-16 14:22:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1315869943</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Funding for E+ Accreditations &amp; QL label</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1315959361</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>at the NA-meeting it was said that this way of working needs further reflection and co-creation As far as we could understand, the set-up presented at the NA-meeting does not fit well with the concept of group projects. What are the next steps in this process?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-16 14:37:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1315959361</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Funding KA150</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1316218212</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Accreditation process is for 7 years; activity plan is for non less than three years; application for grant is forseen for one year : we n<br>eed practical exemples on how to manage with yearly adec and pluriannual accreditation</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-16 15:19:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1316218212</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Questions on Accreditation</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319518750</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are some unclarities in ACC-applications on the process, rules and technical implementation:</div><ul><li>how and where the potential visit to the applicant org. is documented?;</li><li>in which way will the results of the visit be considered in assessment and where will that be marked?;</li><li>how, in practice, will the accredited organisations introduce changes to their strategic plan? in which tool?;</li><li>what will be the process in the NA to assess the changes? and how is it communicated?;</li><li>details on the planned/required monitoring of the accredited organisations?</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 08:26:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319518750</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Project Start</title>
         <author>margretzeiner</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319531011</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Yesterday, Jadranka mentioned the project starts for solidarity projects and volunteering. I didn't quite catch it - was it 01.08.2021? Thanks!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 08:30:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319531011</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Operational vs Financial Capacity Check?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319551915</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>.how do  these differ?</div><ul><li>which type of documents are requested, and what is meant to be checked/assessed?</li></ul><div> </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 08:36:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319551915</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>TCA unused budget - where to transfer?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319569133</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Now the TCA is within KA3 - should the NA have unused funds will there be a possibility to transfer them to projects? To what Key Action? This will be probably explained in the Delegation Agreements (are they called differently now?), but we do have them for the moment.<br>When TCA was part of KA2 we could make transfers to KA2 projects. And now?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 08:42:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319569133</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Delegation Agreements/ WP2021 approval</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319574964</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Any news when these may be finalised? :-)<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 08:44:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319574964</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Certification of informal groups</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319587675</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Currently two differing definitions exist on what consitutes an informal group of young people - the definitions have not been aligned.<br>Since OIDs (and the validation / certification) are not bound to programmes, how are NAs supposed to certify these groups? What happens if the group is certifiable / eligible in E+, but not in ESC?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 08:48:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319587675</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>When are the assessment webinars planned?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319650864</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We'll have assessors' meeting mid-April, thus the question is if these webinars will be beforehand or later?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 09:11:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319650864</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Fin cap at budget request?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319750415</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the accreditation and QL, why is the financial capacity check not made until the budget request? If the financial risk is deemed to be too high can we then reject a budget request from an accredited organisation? <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 09:45:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319750415</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Eligible QL applicants?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319752264</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the ESC draft shared last week it is stated that organisations that have applied for QL are eligible also for the budget requests. Is this decided and can we plan accordingly? <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 09:45:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319752264</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Additional guiding documents</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319813273</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>when can we expect to see supporting documents to the PGs such as experts guide?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 10:08:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319813273</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Small-scale partnerships</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319957662</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The lump-sum funding is a very good way of keeping admin at a lower level. At application/selection stage, though, the levels of funding are quite far apart: € 30.000 and € 60.000 - and nothing in between. We expect that some applicants will ask for too much money. Will we be able to 'relegate' them to a lower funding level or cut the (lump-sum) funding to a realistic amount?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 10:59:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319957662</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bankruptcies</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319967022</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We were warnde by our (external) Independent Audit Body of the following. Due to Covid and the subsequent financial crisis we need to foresee that, unfortunately, some organisation will wind down due to bankruptcies. Have EC considered this? What are the consequences of any considerations?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 11:02:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1319967022</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>E+ Accreditation </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1320124395</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the latest draft PG Participation projects are not among the eligible types of activities covered in the accreditation. <br>We know they will not be funded for 2021, but they will be as of 2022 and they still are selectable in the accreditation application. Could this be clarified in the PG? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 11:57:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1320124395</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Partner Countries</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1320809989</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As mentioned by colleagues during the NA-meeting, the model used is still a model where one participant from partner countries means the whole activity is under the heading/funding partner countries. In the past, different models have been suggested ie. only the participants from partner countries are on the partner countries budget or the whole activity if it takes place in a partner country or ... looking at this differently could have real positive impact on the programme and give a more accurate image of the programme. Is a discussion foreseen on this?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-17 14:15:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1320809989</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Solidarity projects - cross-border</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324400189</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Could you confirm if cross-border co-operation with Norway and/or Russia is possible? <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 08:30:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324400189</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>We`re aware about embargo and PG2021, but could we start with counseling with potential applicants in a meantime in regards of the Erasmus priorities (thematic workshops), while PG was set in final version? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324451906</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 08:48:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324451906</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>In order to avoid prefinancing being spent on keeping the org. alive, followed by cancellation of project and not being able to reimburse: Can we put a hold-on of the prefinancing, waiting until activities actually takes place? Alternatively pay only e.g. 30 % in prefinancing?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324611298</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 09:44:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324611298</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>KA150 budget allocation tables</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324618906</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>in education and training a "Budget allocation rules for accredited beneficiaries" is being circulated, will Youth use a similar one? when will it be sent to NAs for consultation?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 09:46:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324618906</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>External experts/assessors:</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324628347</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>If the expert is from an organisation that applies for a KA2 project in R1, can s/he still be assessing applications for KA1 in R1?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 09:50:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324628347</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Inclusion support</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324699089</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>About the inclusion support to young people with fewer opportunities in youth mobility projects: As the funding mechanism is unit costs, we need to identify the number of young people that should receive this support. What is the base for this number? Is it the declaration by the applicant in the application form / final report? Do we foresee any mechanism to make sure the declaration meets the reality? (For example: we have signature lists to make sure that number of pax declared is the same with number of people attended. Will young people with fewer opportunities need to tick a box in this signature list or sign another declaration or…)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 10:16:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324699089</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Youth participation activity</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324703719</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Could there be more than 1 coach? E.g. 1 coach in different organisations, as long as the max 12 days in total is kept?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 10:17:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324703719</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Youth participation activity</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324710579</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To trigger the 100 euros: How long must an event last?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 10:20:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324710579</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>KA2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324865993</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Applications for Cooperation partnerships (one of the 2 types of Partnerships for cooperation) shall be assessed under the relevance criterium on if:</div><ul><li>the proposal is innovative;</li><li>The proposal is complementary to other initiatives already carried out by the participating organisations;</li></ul><div>Is it either or (in the previous programme it was and/or)? Since it is no longer called Strategic partnerships for innovation, is the idea now that the projects can be equally ranged as of high relevance even if they are not innovative? Or is it based on if they apply for funding of development of concrete project results (earlier called Intellectual outputs) that the innovative or complementary aspect of the results shall be assessed upon?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 11:18:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1324865993</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Translation ESC Slogan in the logo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1325040433</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Does the translation of the slogan THE POWER OF TOGETHER need to very close to the original?<br>We would like to use "Solidaarisuutta Suomessa" and not what is proposed - as the proposed once feels a bit "mouldy"...<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 12:13:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1325040433</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Communication</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1325154618</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>EU Youth Programmes - we are used to this, and have a common newsletter, social media accounts, etc. for both E+Youth and ESC - and a common landing page on web, but then differing by Prog.<br>We are quite puzzled that now there is emphasis to differentiate in communicating whilst on the other hand increased synergies are sought.<br>Question: Will COM continue speaking on EU Youth Programmes and/or would you support us doing so?!<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 12:42:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1325154618</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Deadline to asses QL-applications?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1325510806</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Will there be a deadline for when QL-applications need to be approved or is it by the time of budget approval?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-18 13:48:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1325510806</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Considering new TCA/NET budget line and connected needs we need the EC confirmation on the use of budget in line with needs connected with efficient TCA/NET activities development, planning, involvement of partners and participants, promotion and visibility, as well as monitoring, reporting and sharing the outcomes and outputs with the youth work community of practice and activity organisers. EC confirmation to such budget costs for TCA/NET in 2021-2027 is very much needed.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1328956125</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-03-19 08:32:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/domagoj_moric/taorwtfgasx79x16/wish/1328956125</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
