<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>E- Portfolio (Assignment 2) by Zoya Aftab</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-02-07 09:12:25 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-02-16 01:16:57 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>310 HSC</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885441412</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>E-portfolio of your own integrative practice</p><p>Zoya Aftab</p><p>Assignment 2</p><p>3220 Words</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:14:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885441412</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Introduction</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885441570</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This E- portfolio highlights my personal philosophy which draws on the theories of Carl Rogers (Rogers, 1961) and John Bowlby (Bowlby, 1969). Including how this forms my integrative stance. The portfolio will then continue to explain the models of integration and common factors model, followed by then reviewing the main interventions and interventions I would use in therapy as an integrative counsellor. Lastly, I will be explaining how I use reflection and supervision in my practice.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:14:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885441570</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Personal Philosophy &amp; How this Informs My Integrative Stance</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885441773</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>My personal philosophy emphasises the significant influence of early events on an individual's maturity, and it is influenced by the writings of prominent thinkers like Carl Rogers and John Bowlby. Based on person-centred and attachment theories, I think that a person's early years determine their mental health and social interactions for the rest of their lives (Delgado et al, 2022, p.1064).</p><p>Carl Rogers' idea of unconditional positive regard, which creates an atmosphere where clients feel valued and accepted without passing judgement, is fundamental to my method (Cherry, 2023).</p><p><br/></p><p>I recognise the significance of stable early attachments in forming a person's sense of self and ability to create healthy relationships, drawing on Bowlby's attachment theory (Main, 2023). My counselling approach is guided by a set of beliefs, values, and principles that I passionately believe in. First of all, I believe that empathy has the power to transform individuals, creating an environment in which they feel authentically understood and validated. Given the diversity of human experiences, it is essential to respect the unique journey and perspective of each client. Confidentiality is essential to fostering a climate of safety and trust. Since they are aware that their information will be strictly protected, clients should feel at ease sharing even the most personal details. Furthermore, I'm committed to upholding the client's rights and autonomy throughout the therapeutic process. Working together and making decisions together enable clients to take an active role in their own development and recovery (BACP, 2024). As a therapist, I work hard to live up to these ideals, understanding the value of ongoing observation and professional growth. I hope to support a therapeutic relationship that encourages personal development, resilience, and self-discovery by incorporating these ideals throughout my work.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:14:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885441773</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>My Model of Integration &amp; Modalities Theory Used</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442023</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I consider my integrative stance to be assimilative. In psychotherapy, the assimilative method integrates components from several therapeutic philosophies, emphasising flexibility and customising interventions to meet the specific needs of each patient. By combining elements of humanistic, cognitive-behavioural, and psychodynamic therapy, this integrative framework promotes a cooperative and flexible therapeutic process. The understanding of the therapist's role as an active participant and the necessity to continuously assimilate and modify procedures in response to the client's changing demands are important ideas.</p><p>Importantly, the assimilative approach has trouble avoiding eclecticism and preserving consistency. The amount of research supporting this strategy is growing, with only a few studies directly evaluating its efficacy. Critics argue that the assimilative technique may lack precision and prevent thorough evaluation in a lack of clear theoretical foundation (Heidenreich, 2021, p. 209).</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>Therapists can use person-centred strategies that promote empathy, unconditional positive regard, and honesty to incorporate humanistic approaches. Therapists that use a client-centred approach give the client's subjective experience more importance, which strengthens the therapeutic connection. When applying organised interventions to target particular inappropriate thoughts and behaviours, cognitive-behavioural therapy is integrated. Maintaining theoretical integration and treatment efficacy while finding a balance between these different components is the challenge. Although the assimilative approach has potential, further research and critical analysis are necessary for its development and general acceptance (BACP, 2024).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:14:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442023</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Models of Integration</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442233</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Integrating several therapy modalities to address clients' needs in a more thorough and efficient manner is known as counselling integration. Integration can be approached from a variety of perspectives, such as eclectic, assimilative, theoretical, and common components.</p><p>Using an eclectic approach, several therapy ideas and procedures are included according to the specific needs of the client. This method allows therapists to include ideas from several theoretical philosophies. It enables tailoring of therapies to the unique problems of the client, encouraging a more individualised and thorough course of care.</p><p>The assimilative method integrates aspects of various theories to meet particular client needs, while acknowledging the value of an essential therapeutic framework. This method promotes a flexible and customised therapy process by enabling counsellors to maintain an essential theoretical focus while modifying interventions from other models.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>The theoretical integration involves integrating two or more well-established theories into an organised structure . For instance, therapists may blend psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioural ideas. It attempts to maximise the benefits of each theory while minimising the disadvantages of each one, offering a more thorough understanding of clients.</p><p>The common factors approach focuses on the elements—such as the therapeutic interaction and client variables—that are shared by different therapeutic orientations and contribute to the efficacy of therapy. This method emphasises the significance of common traits that lead to favourable results, enabling counsellors to concentrate on components that work regardless of theoretical orientation (Kamara, 2013).</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>In my work as a counsellor, I might take an assimilative approach, using mindfulness and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) strategies with a primary focus on psychodynamic theory. In this approach, the therapy would be guided by a basic understanding of unconscious processes and early experiences, with the application of CBT and mindfulness therapies to address urgent difficulties and improve the client's ability to cope. With the ability to adjust to each client's specific demands, the assimilative method provides a customised and individualised therapeutic experience. The assimilative method can potentially improve therapy success by utilising the strengths of several therapeutic modalities by incorporating strategies from multiple theories. The assimilative approach preserves an essential theoretical start offering an integrated structure for clients, in contrast to eclectic options.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>However, if these approaches are not carefully integrated, there is a potential of theoretical confusion, which is one of the limits of the assimilative approach. It's important for therapists to stay clear about the key concepts that drive their interventions. It can call for in-depth training in a variety of therapeutic modalities, and not all therapists have the time or means to commit to such intensive training. It can be difficult to use the assimilative approach when determining which components from several theories are best appropriate for a client.</p><p>To sum up, the assimilative approach provides a balance between the ability to adopt techniques from diverse perspectives and a core theoretical focus.Even though it offers flexibility and may even increase therapeutic efficacy, it needs to be carefully considered to prevent theoretical misunderstanding and continuous training to successfully integrate various modalities (Zarbo et al, 2016, p. 6).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:15:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442233</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Common Factors Approach</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442456</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The common variables approach to integrated psychotherapy supports the hypothesis regarding the characteristics that are prevalent in numerous treatment options that have a greater impact on the effectiveness of therapy over specific methods or theoretical models. This method highlights the significance of factors that are present beyond the boundaries of the therapeutic environment, like the client's attributes and the therapeutic alliance, for achieving positive results.</p><p>Incorporating the common factors model into your counselling practice as an assimilative, person-centred therapist within the context of person-centred therapy includes numerous important considerations.</p><p>First and foremost, the therapeutic connection is essential. Place a strong emphasis on developing and preserving a trustworthy, cooperative connection with your client. This relationship's quality is seen to be crucial to therapy's effectiveness (Wampold, 2015, p. 270). Developing empathy, expressing unconditional positive regard, and making sure that all of your interactions are consistent and necessary for building a successful connection. Another important component is identifying and addressing unique client factors.</p><p>Adjust your therapeutic approach to suit each client's particular needs, preferences, and traits. A client-centred and individualised approach supports the common factors model's emphasis on client-specific issues while also adding to the overall efficacy of the therapy. Adaptability and quick thinking are essential elements in incorporating the common factors approach. Adjust your strategy in response to changing needs and client feedback (Zarbo, 2016, p. 6). This adaptability promotes a feeling of cooperation and understanding between the parties and enables a more dynamic and client-centred treatment procedure.</p><p>Maintain your use of person-centred strategies like unconditional positive regard, sympathetic understanding, and thoughtful listening. These methods, which are integral to person-centred therapy, support the common factors model's general principles and strengthen the therapeutic relationship.</p><p>Setting goals along with clients is a crucial routine. The common factors model emphasises how crucial it is to set specific objectives and collaborate with others to achieve them. Make sure that these objectives align with the client's values and preferences in order to foster a feeling of commitment and responsibility towards the therapeutic process.</p><p>It is crucial to be sensitive to cultural differences. Recognise and deal with any cultural influences that can affect the therapeutic alliance. Clients from a variety of backgrounds will benefit from a more inclusive and successful therapeutic experience when you incorporate cultural competency into your practice.</p><p>Although person-centred therapy is still your major focus, including strategies from other therapeutic perspectives if they fit the needs and objectives of your clients is acceptable. By utilising a wider range of therapeutic components, this integrative method, which is informed by the common factors model, improves the overall efficacy of the counselling practice. In summary, adopting the common factors model into an assimilative, person-centred therapeutic approach requires maintaining flexibility, incorporating cultural sensitivity, and prioritising the therapeutic alliance. You can improve the ability to address the variety of requirements of the clients and help therapy outcomes by adopting these ideas (Browne et al, 2021).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:15:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442456</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Interventions I Use with my Client</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442616</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Using an assimilative approach to therapy, I carefully combine aspects of person-centred, humanistic, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and attachment theories, acknowledging the unique strengths of each and resolving any potential conflicts. My main/core approach is humanistic and person-centred, putting the client's comprehensive understanding first. It also emphasises the client's autonomy, empathy, and unconditional positive respect. In humanistic frameworks, this horizontal approach recognises that clients have an innate sense of when treatment should end, which promotes a cooperative therapeutic alliance.</p><p>Nevertheless, incorporating CBT into the therapeutic setting may provide a dilemma. Because of its design, CBT is typically more directed and structured, with the therapist playing a more active role in directing sessions.</p><p>Tension may arise at first from the conflict between the vertical structure of CBT and the horizontal nature of humanistic concepts. However, by taking an assimilative approach, these seemingly incompatible components can be brought into balance. The therapy method can flexibly switch between a more client-led, experimental mode and an organised, goal-oriented CBT mode as needed because it acknowledges that clients differ in their needs and preferences.</p><p>Another key component that aids in comprehending the dynamics of interpersonal relationships is attachment theory. The focus of treatment is expanded to include the client's relationship patterns and emotional control by implementing attachment principles. This approach deepens the therapeutic relationship's understanding by balancing the humanistic emphasis on empathy and connection (Wampold, 2015, p. 270).</p><p>Resolving disagreements between theoretical and practical viewpoints involves dealing with the power dynamics that exist within therapeutic relationships. The humanistic and person-centred approaches support shared power and place a strong emphasis on the independence and independence of the client. This can be in opposition to the more directive approach that CBT is sometimes linked with. In order for the client to benefit from the structured strategies of CBT and feel empowered to actively participate in their therapeutic journey, the therapist must carefully balance these approaches in practice (Castonguay et al, 2019, p. 140) .</p><p>To sum up, the assimilative method recognises potential contradictions between the principles of attachment, person-centred, humanistic, and cognitive behavioural therapy. The therapist can manage the resulting conflicts by taking a flexible and client-centred approach. This enables a dynamic and customised therapeutic process that honours each client's individuality while implementing research-proven change management techniques. Therefore, the assimilative approach offers a thorough framework that promotes holistic client growth and self-discovery by using the advantages of many therapy modalities (Yao &amp; Kabir, 2023, p. 6).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:15:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442616</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>My Therapeutic Relationship with Clients</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442803</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Clarkson's model supplies an approach for understanding and addressing the interpersonal behaviours of clients, therefore applying it in partnership with attachment theory might be effective. The significance of attachment styles on an individual's relationships with others is accepted by Clarkson's model, which combines this data along with other relational aspects.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>The five relationships identified by Clarkson address different elements of the therapeutic relationship:</p><p>The Working Alliance: With an emphasis on objectives, assignments, and their common connection, this represents the cooperative interaction between the therapist and the client.</p><p>Transferential and Countertransferential: Specifically in relation to the context of attachment models, these connections contain the unconscious responses and assumptions from the counsellor and the client derived from previous events.</p><p>The Reparenting Relationship: With assistance, nurturing, and advice on how to meet neglected childhood desires, this demonstrates how the therapeutic relationship resembles features of successful maternal nursing.</p><p>The Person-to-Person Relationship:In order to develop assurance and friendship, this highlights the honest, authentic relationship that is present between a client and therapist outside of their professional positions.</p><p>The Transpersonal Relationship: Containing psychological or ethical attributes and aiming for transcendence, advancement, and creating significance, this goes beyond one's personal and interpersonal aspects (Feltham, 1999).</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>In Clarkson's model, every relationship component interacts with attachment dynamics to promote deeper healing and learning during the therapeutic process. Within the framework of attachment theory, therapists can improve their clients' self-awareness, relationship skills, and general well-being by comprehending and addressing these aspects.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>Since Clarkson's model easily integrates with client-centred and humanistic ideas, it is a good fit for an assimilative approach. It offers an organised, yet flexible, framework that incorporates many therapy methods while honouring the client's autonomy and subjective experience. Because of this similarity, a counsellor can uphold the basic values of sincerity and unconditional positive regard while yet getting a thorough understanding of attachment dynamics and the therapeutic relationship.</p><p>In order to address each client's individual requirements, the therapist actively combines several therapeutic approaches and procedures while in the assimilative position. This requires an open therapeutic alliance between the therapist and the client that is dynamic and flexible. The assimilation position recognises the importance of customised interventions for each individual, employing an adaptable and open-minded approach that strengthens the therapeutic connection. In my experience, this approach has proven beneficial in my client work since it enables a tailored and client-focused approach that encourages empowerment and teamwork (Clarkson, 1996).</p><p>One of the main components of Clarkson's approach, person-centred therapy, emphasises the importance of congruence, empathy, and unconditional positive regard as fundamental elements of the therapeutic relationship. These circumstances establish a secure and encouraging atmosphere that makes it easier for the client to explore their feelings and ideas. Using a person-centred approach has been crucial to building rapport and trust in my client work. I've seen clients express themselves more honestly and openly when I embody empathy and maintain congruence, and this deepens the therapy relationship (Clarkson, 2003).</p><p>Additionally, Clarkson's model emphasises the value of the real relationship which is, the sincere and real bond between the client and the therapist. According to my assimilative perspective, the therapeutic relationship is improved when person-centred concepts are combined with other therapeutic modalities, such as cognitive-behavioural approaches. This integration combines knowledge and empathy with effective tools for change, enabling an in-depth understanding of the client's experience.</p><p>In conclusion, the efficacy of counselling practice is dependent on the therapeutic relationship, as described in Clarkson's integrative model. Strong therapeutic alliances are encouraged by both person-centred treatment and the assimilative perspective, which emphasise flexibility and integration and core conditions, accordingly. I have seen the positive impact of applying these relational approaches on client involvement and progress, which emphasises the critical role that the therapeutic relationship plays in promoting significant therapeutic outcomes (Clarkson, 1995, p.6).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:15:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885442803</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Some of the interventions I Use with my Client</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443007</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As part of my integrative counselling approach, I use a framework that combines multiple therapeutic modalities to tailor my interventions to meet the specific requirements and preferences of each client. Using the five P's model: predisposing factors, precipitating factors, perpetuating factors, protective factors, and positive elements. This strategy helps create a comprehensive treatment plan by offering an in-depth understanding of the client's concerns.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>Predisposing factors, as explained by the 5 P's framework, determine a client's perspective on their present challenges by considering aspects such as personality traits, childhood events, and familial relationships. One method for determining precipitating factors is to recognise the specific events or stimuli which trigger the client's problems. Perpetuating factors concentrate on the recurrent tendencies which enable the challenge to continue, whilst safeguarding elements address the client's benefits and capabilities. Positive aspects: focus on identifying possible causes of development and adaptability.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>The 5 P's model, which offers an organised and thorough approach to looking into and understanding clients' experiences, compliments my integrative perspective, even if humanistic approaches typically avoid case formulation. Although humanistic approaches place emphasis on the personal experience of the individual and the therapeutic interaction, the 5 P's model supports my view that an in-depth assessment is essential to developing a complete and successful treatment plan (Peters, 2020, p. 327).</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>I use humanistic approaches in my work, such as reflective questioning, unconditional positive regard, and empathic listening, to create a therapeutic environment that is encouraging and judgement-free. These methods, which emphasise the value of therapeutic interaction in promoting personal development and self-discovery, are consistent with my person-centred foundation.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>In order to address particular cognitive patterns and behavioural habits that are contributing to clients' issues, I also use approaches from Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). Cognitive therapy encourages cognitive flexibility and more positive viewpoints by assisting clients in recognising and challenging incorrect thought processes. Goal-setting and exposure strategies are two examples of behavioural therapies that help clients make good changes in their daily lives.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>Therapy is an integrative strategy that permits patients to engage in a substantial part throughout medical care, which is something I value as a humanistic and person-centred therapist. I ensure that I incorporate CBT procedures with caution, taking into account the patient's desires and viewpoints. This methodology emphasises my commitment to appreciating the individuality of each individual while implementing tactics supported by data to enhance therapy effectiveness (Garber et al, 2016, p. 186).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:16:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443007</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How I Use Reflection &amp; Supervision in my Practice</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443140</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The input given by the client can allow the counsellor to consider how to proceed using a client-focused strategy while altering interventions. Personal biases and cultural sensitivity should be assessed by the counsellor, as self awareness is necessary. This would be achieved by using continuous reflections which consist of acknowledging resistance, maintaining the therapeutic relationship and modifying methods in response to the clients changing requirements. Recording sessions or writing notes during or after each session will make this easier. A setting favourable to the clients development can be created by regular, individual, group supervision and professional development, enhanced by the effectiveness of the counsellor. These will all be aligned with the good practice in action guidelines by the BACP Framework (BACP, 2024).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:16:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443140</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Conclusion </title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443377</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>To summarise, in order to supply clients with an in-depth and beneficial counselling encounter, my integrative technique for therapy integrates components from various other forms of treatment. Applying case development mechanisms which include the 5 P's and humanist principles like positive unconditional regard, my objective is to establish an effective therapeutic atmosphere that acknowledges each client's individuality while addressing their particular requirements and concerns. By thorough evaluation, self-awareness and evaluation, I apply constant improvements to my method to keep it relevant for clients. By sustaining a client-centred perspective, acknowledging one's own beliefs, and placing a significant value on cultural understanding, my aim is to develop a nurturing and secure environment where clients are able to express their thoughts, emotions, and perspectives.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:16:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443377</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>References</title>
         <author>zoyaaftab00</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443545</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP). (2024). Confidentiality. <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.bacp.co.uk/about-us/protecting-the-public/professional-conduct/what-complaints-tell-us/confidentiality/">https://www.bacp.co.uk/about-us/protecting-the-public/professional-conduct/what-complaints-tell-us/confidentiality/</a></p><p>British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP). (2024). Equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) within the counselling professions. https://www.bacp.co.uk/media/10120/bacp-edi-within-counselling-professions-crp-gpia063-nov20.pdf</p><p>British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP). (2024). What is person-centred counselling? https://www.bacp.co.uk/about-therapy/types-of-therapy/person-centred-counselling/</p><p>Browne, J., Cather, C., &amp; Mueser, K. (2021). Common Factors in Psychotherapy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://oxfordre.com/psychology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-79</p><p>Castonguay, L. G., Neman, M. G., Holtforth, M. G., (2019). Cognitive-Behavioral Assimilative Integration. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190690465.003.0011</p><p>Cherry, K. (2023). Unconditional Positive Regard in Psychology. VeryWellMind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-unconditional-positive-regard-2796005</p><p>Clarkson, P. (1995). A Multiplicity of Psychotherapeutic Relationships ( 1st ed.). British Journal of Psychotherapy.</p><p><br/></p><p>Clarkson, P. (1996). A Global Vision: Taking Gestalt Therapy into the 21st Century [online]. The Gestalt Therapy Page. https://www.gestalt.org/clarkson/</p><p>Clarkson, P. (2003). The Therapeutic Relationship. 2nd ed. London: Whurr.</p><p><br/></p><p>Delgado, E., Serna, C., Martínez, I., &amp; Cruise, E. (2022). Parental Attachment and Peer Relationships in Adolescence: A Systematic Review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031064</p><p>Feltham, C. (Ed.) (1999). Understanding the counselling relationship. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218037</p><p>Garber, J., Frankel, S. A., &amp; Herrington, C. G. (2016). Developmental Demands of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Children and Adolescents: Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Processes. Annual review of clinical psychology, 12, 181–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112836</p><p>Heidenreich, T., Noyon, A., Worrell, M., &amp; Menzies, R. (2021). Existential Approaches and Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Challenges and Potential. International journal of cognitive therapy, 14(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-020-00096-1</p><p>Kamara, A. (2013). Integrative Psychotherapy as an Effective Form of Counselling. Counselling Directory. https://www.counselling-directory.org.uk/memberarticles/integrative-psychotherapy-is-the-best-approach</p><p>Main, P (2023). Bowlby's Attachment Theory. Structural Learning. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/bowlbys-attachment-theory</p><p>Peters, S. W., (2020). Case Formulation and Intervention: Application of the Five Ps Framework in Substance Use Counseling. TPC Journal. 10(3), Pages 327–336. doi:10.15241/swp.10.3.327</p><p>Wampold B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14(3), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238</p><p>Yao, L., &amp; Kabir, R. (2023). Person-Centered Therapy (Rogerian Therapy) (1st ed.). StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589708/#article-147772.s7</p><p>Zarbo, C., Tasca, G. A., Cattafi, F., &amp; Compare, A. (2016). Integrative Psychotherapy Works. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02021</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-16 01:16:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/zoyaaftab00/t7i6tzhspnxzi0hg/wish/2885443545</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
