We found that he overall views and motivation of the opposing team was solely based on the company's interests with very little concern on the ethical aspect. 

As for allowing the establishment of the labor union, SPT 2 suggested that Hankook Textiles should see improvements in terms of minimum loss of profit, better communication, and reputation. Another solution, investing in marketing, was also suggested on the ability to make the public pay more attention to low prices rather than work conditions, exemplified with the situation of corporations such as SHEIN and H&M. Regrading the last solution, SPT 2 suggested that finding less sensitive countries, other than Laos, has many opportunities because a lot of governments will want Hankook Textiles factory with low wages. Therefore, This solution also accounts for minimum loss of profit. However, the withdrawal of Laos offshore facility and searching for other countries to invest does not sound like a credible or rational solution to our team. In addition, no precedence and not enough evidence was provided for this. And SPT 2 admitted the latter solution may cause social problems.

We carefully listened to the presentation and asked questions on their views and inquired evidences. Our team's opinions and values, i.e., to vouch for a more ethically-inclined resolution, has very few to no significant changes due primarily to the opposing team's lack of crucial data support, and ignorance on ethical concern in their arguments and persuasion.