Why was the Second Round Table Conference of 1931 unsuccessful? by Zoonia Tariq/TCHR/CNTB

The Nehru Report was a significant document produced by the All Parties Conference chaired by Motilal Nehru in 1928. It laid out the Indian National Congress's vision for constitutional reforms in British India. But the rights of Muslims were not given separate electorates and religious teaching was banned

2024-02-27 07:07:57 UTC

The Nehru Report of 1928 was a memorandum All Parties Conference in British India to appeal for a new dominion status and a federal set-up of government for the constitution of India. It also proposed for the Joint Electorates with reservation of seats for minorities in the legislatures. It was prepared by a committee chaired by Motilal Nehru, with Jawaharlal Nehru acting as the secretary.

parachak881 — 2024-02-27 07:08:32 UTC

haffi

haffi4169 — 2024-02-27 07:09:40 UTC

Gandhi supported the Nehru Report because it advocated for complete independence for India, as opposed to the Dominion status offered by the British government. Gandhi believed that complete independence was essential for achieving true self-rule and autonomy for India.

Gandhi initially endorsed the Nehru Report, which was a reaction to British plans for constitutional reform in India. However, he eventually retracted his support owing to worries over the exclusion or non-inclusion of some minority rights, particularly those of Muslims.

hamza4834 — 2024-02-27 07:09:47 UTC

2024-02-27 07:10:02 UTC

The labour party wanted to bring reforms, wanted to manage everything but failed at it.

labour party detected the first RTC.

2024-02-27 07:11:43 UTC

Group A-(Muhammad Ali)

ali94270 — 2024-02-27 07:12:33 UTC

The Second Round Table Conference held in 1931 in London failed primarily due to the inability of the British government and Indian political leaders to reach a consensus on key issues. One of the Major Reasons for the failure of the 2nd round table conference was that Labour party had lost power. The Labour Party had different objectives and had lost power. This Made Other Orgainstaion being elected and making a Failure for the Round Table conferences.

Gandhi took a hard line in the talks and refused to recognize the problems of the minorities in the subcontinent.

2024-02-27 07:13:23 UTC

quiad eazam wanted 14 points to be implemented they were saving muslim rights

2024-02-27 07:13:43 UTC

Rights of minorities(oppressed)

mustafa3667 — 2024-02-27 07:14:12 UTC

Gandhi due to his claim of being representative of all Indians no matter to which religious or ethical group they belonged to.He with huge confidence had this stance even tough he opposed the right of minorities in first round table conference.

haffi

haffi4169 — 2024-02-27 07:14:44 UTC

muslim league led by muhammed ali jinnnah opposed nehru report as they felt they does mot address their concerns or interests, The Muslim League also wanted safeguards for the protection of Muslim rights in areas where they were in a minority. They were concerned about potential domination by the Hindu majority and wanted assurances that their religious, cultural, and political rights would be protected in any future political setup.

Muhammad Ahmad

2024-02-27 07:14:44 UTC

Labour party had different objectives and had lost power.

2024-02-27 07:14:45 UTC

The Labour Party had a role in the Round Table Conferences because they didn't agree with the Simon Commission and supported Indian self-government. They took part in the conferences, but their influence was limited because they were sometimes not in power, there were disagreements within the party, and the British government's control over India restricted potential changes.

Gandhi refused to accept that other minorities should get separate electorates, he thought India is only for Congress or Hindus.

2024-02-27 07:16:34 UTC

2024-02-27 07:16:49 UTC

However, in later times the Labour party lost to the majority conservative party in the British elections and so the 2nd Round table conference had served no purpose as the dominant conservative party members were not interested in bringing the reforms for self rule in india

Muhammad Ahmad

2024-02-27 07:18:32 UTC

Labour party had a role in RTC because they didn't agree with the Simon commission and supported Indian self government.

mustafa3667 — 2024-02-27 07:18:34 UTC

This was a a accelerating move for Pakistan Movement

It was the base reason of dead lock

ahsan1466 — 2024-02-27 07:18:44 UTC

future negotion based sindh should be differnet from bombay

2024-02-27 07:19:39 UTC

Gandhi's approach to minority rights might have evolved over time and might not fully align with contemporary notions of minority rights, it's inaccurate to claim that he didn't recognize the rights of minorities at all. His life's work and principles demonstrate a commitment to pluralism, tolerance, and social justice for all members of society.

ahsan1466 — 2024-02-27 07:19:59 UTC

Muhammad Ahmad

2024-02-27 07:20:09 UTC

Labour Party had different objectives and then lost his value.

Gandhi represented the Congress but he declared that the Congress was the only political party which could speak for all the Indian people. He also declared that there was no minority problem in India.

daniyal7115 — 2024-02-27 07:20:10 UTC

haffi4169 — 2024-02-27 07:21:08 UTC

muhammad Ali Jinnah wanted to make sure that Muslims in India had a fair say in how the country was run. He asked for separate electorates for Muslims, protection of their rights, and autonomy for Muslim-majority provinces. Jinnah also wanted Muslims to have a say in the government and the army, and to protect their schools and businesses. His Fourteen Points were important in making sure that Muslims' voices were heard in the political decisions of India.

The Second Round Table Conference of 1931, held in London, was unsuccessful for some reasons like many disagreements among the participants.The Second Round Table Conference failed due to the absence of key Indian political actors, inadequate representation,

ayaan6453 — 2024-02-27 07:24:51 UTC

Gandhi proposed a resolution saying that British should be given one year to accept the recommendations of the Nehru report or a campaign of non-cooperation would begin. The resolution was passed.

parachak881 — 2024-02-27 07:25:55 UTC