<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assessment Jam by Sarah Bresnahan</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z</link>
      <description>Follow up from Last Monday&#39;s Chat on Assessment Levels</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-09-26 20:38:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-12-09 17:58:10 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Support for learners striving for Level 6</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416227169</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>When challenges lend themselves to lower level assessments (eg. 3 or 4), how can learners be guided to achieve level 5 or 6?</li><li>How do I support learners when the Personalize prompt does not allow for learners to achieve the high level assessments that they are hoping for?</li><li>What would  a learner need to submit in order to  to achieve a level 6 in their Learning Portfolio? </li><li>How can learners be supported in going deeper in order to achieve the higher level (when challenges don’t naturally ‘go there’)?</li><li>Is level 6 really achievable at all in any of the options?  Examples would be great for learners. </li><li>How can we encourage the higher level learners to strive for their best when the support materials are geared more towards lower level learners?</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:00:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416227169</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Getting Clear on &#39;Discover&#39;</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416228044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>When a learner works within Discover, but produces outstanding artifacts, how do I assess that? I thought Discover could allow for a maximum of a level 3.</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:02:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416228044</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sharing where learners are at</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416228467</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. How do we inform our learners more clearly where they are at, when summative assessment happens at the end of the semester? We are concerned about surprising learners with lower assessments than they expect to achieve. <br>2. If learners are asking for more specific indications of levels throughout the semester can we be providing that?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:03:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416228467</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Consistent and Transparent assessment</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416228688</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. How do LS achieve consistency in assessment? Could LSs gather to discuss summative assessment and perhaps create consistent benchmarks within courses? <br>2. How are we planning on sharing this information about which level correlates with which option?  It is important to remain transparent if this is part of the intended design from CDT, though not necessarily fair for it to only come out at summative assessment time.<br>3. How can we provide learners clear information of where they are at?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:03:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416228688</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Assessment Discrepancies between where learner thinks they are and where LS has them</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416229161</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. How do we explain rubric discrepancies to learners (where things might not match up and achieving higher levels needs a lot of ‘learner interpretation’ of the prompt)?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:04:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416229161</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Program Design Questions</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416229466</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>How can we scaffold more?</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:04:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416229466</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LFR</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416229653</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. What can we do about learner-friend rubric ‘issues’? For example, does the LFR actually give an accurate description of a level 6? <br>2. Does the learner friendly rubric truly give learners a good understanding of how the Discover, FtS and Personalize options relate to assessment?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-25 16:04:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416229653</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Getting Clear on Personalize</title>
         <author>sarahbresnahan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416835096</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. How are we planning on sharing this information about which level correlates with which option?  It is important to remain transparent if this is part of the intended design from CDT, though not necessarily fair for it to only come out at summative assessment time.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-26 18:40:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/416835096</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>davidrussellloe</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/418578499</link>
         <description><![CDATA[When challenges lend themselves to lower level assessments (eg. 3 or 4), how can learners be guided to achieve level 5 or 6?
]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-02 16:53:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/418578499</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Scaffolding/supporting</title>
         <author>michaelbender1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/421750192</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How can we scaffold in a way that encourages learners to guide their own learning and doesn't promote their dependence on scaffolding gestures?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-12-09 17:52:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sarahbresnahan/t2mexqa4c89z/wish/421750192</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
