https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8 What do we know that might support each of the options on North Korea that we have examined? Please post your ideas for each option below. en-us 2018-04-03 10:04:17 UTC 2018-04-03 13:56:43 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248106679 If North Korea sign it will Let them have an opinion, which makes it less likely for them to bomb]]> 2018-04-03 13:30:09 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248106679 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248108496 I pick option two because this would also protect the United States. This would also consider and contain the threat from North Korea and take away their weapons.]]> 2018-04-03 13:34:19 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248108496 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248108879 It will elimate weapons of mass distruction]]> 2018-04-03 13:35:07 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248108879 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248108932 6 countries will all decide together on what to do with North Korea, split responsibilities and help re-make North Korea from ground up. There will be conflicts between the countries e.g Russia and China are good friends to each other and both are communism, same as North Korea.]]> 2018-04-03 13:35:13 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248108932 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248109258 I think that a preemptive strike is a great option because if we launched a strike it would practically make them unable to launch nuclear weapons at us and other countries. It would also make them an easier target to hit and attack. ]]> 2018-04-03 13:36:00 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248109258 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248109471 Bilateral negotiations make it easier for the US to push for what we want rather than compromise with four other countries in addition to North Korea.]]> 2018-04-03 13:36:31 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248109471 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248109644 Six-Party Talks would be the best option due to it putting more pressure on North Korea. If we all meet together and pressure North Korea into denuclearization, they’d have to listen. This would involve us working with their greatest ally. If only the U.S. meets with them, they won’t feel enough pressure, but if we get Japan, China, Russia, and South Korea involved with us, it’ll bring a lot more to the table.]]> 2018-04-03 13:36:53 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248109644 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110166 I agree with this one because if we don’t attack now it will give the more time to build more nuclear weapons in turn making them more dangerous. This could be the only option for peace and security of the future ]]> 2018-04-03 13:38:02 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110166 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110258 in All the options there’s an opportunity to lose a lot, weather it’s the risk  of losing military lives or the threat of a world war. I don’t think that we should take the risk of losing that much. With option three, it seems to be the one with the less risk rather then other countries thinking were weak.]]> 2018-04-03 13:38:13 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110258 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110324 We should have a talk before we go into a war or so we won’t have to be bombed ]]> 2018-04-03 13:38:22 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110324 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110619 The 6 parties should be nice to each other and give out the best solution together instead of waring each other]]> 2018-04-03 13:39:03 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110619 ian_lau20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110805 We deter or turn North Koreas aggression away from U.S.]]> 2018-04-03 13:39:26 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110805 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110839 US has edge if we attack them before they attack us.]]> 2018-04-03 13:39:30 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110839 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110947 Spending millions of dollars on the North Korean problem will deprive us of the resources we need to address the many problems we face at home]]> 2018-04-03 13:39:42 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248110947 parker_doane20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111034 obliterate em before they do us. Their leader(s) has/have proven to be irrational and has violated many agreements, and will no longer meet with us. It's clear they have no mind to back down and stop nuclear research so we must take things into our own hands before one of Kim's test turn into something a little bigger]]> 2018-04-03 13:39:54 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111034 josemanuel_toraya20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111151 I think that a preemptive strike is a good option because one of the goals is eliminate North Korea’s nuclear capability by destroying its arsenal as well as the reactors and processors that are producing weapons-grade plutonium and uranium.]]> 2018-04-03 13:40:12 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111151 ian_lau20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111219 One of our goals is to eliminate growing pattern of manipulation and threat by North Korea.]]> 2018-04-03 13:40:24 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111219 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111255 More potential power to fight North Korea with.]]> 2018-04-03 13:40:30 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111255 nicholas_mcdonald20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111608 A preemptive strike would allow us to swiftly deal with the issue at hand. It would give us the element of surprise and we would be able to neutralize them with minimal effort ]]> 2018-04-03 13:41:17 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248111608 josemanuel_toraya20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248112338 This would be the best option because if North Korea return to the six party talks, US and North Korea can finish their weapons of mass destruction in a peaceful way.]]> 2018-04-03 13:42:59 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248112338 josemanuel_toraya20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248113217 This would be a good option because if North Korea agree with the bilateral negotiations they would stop the development of their nuclear weapons.]]> 2018-04-03 13:44:49 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248113217 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248113867 Takes US troops out of direct danger.]]> 2018-04-03 13:46:07 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248113867 josemanuel_toraya20 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248114395 This would lower the profile of the US in Asia and this would help that North Korea stop their growing patterns of manipulation in their government.]]> 2018-04-03 13:47:15 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248114395 https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248115269 North Korea never follow the rules. They signed the NPT, but still working on their nuclear program. They agree to stop the nuclear program, but they are still working on their nuclear in the mountains. You can not stop them by only having negotiation with them.]]> 2018-04-03 13:49:12 UTC https://padlet.com/john_raby/t0o9g2qmdfh8/wish/248115269