<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>5 amendment  by Abigail Kokales</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-11-20 14:18:57 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-11-21 14:45:54 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>rights of being accused </title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414021224</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://wallpaperaccess.com/full/702978.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-20 14:43:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414021224</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414021874</link>
         <description><![CDATA[The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-20 14:44:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414021874</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414289821</link>
         <description><![CDATA[The second section is commonly referred to as the “double jeopardy” clause, and it protects citizens against a second prosecution after an acquittal or a conviction, as well as against multiple punishments for the same offense. Caveats to this provision include permissions to try persons for civil and criminal aspects of an offense, conspiring to commit as well as to commit an offense, and separate trials for acts that violate laws of both the federal and state governments, although federal laws generally suppress prosecution by the national government if a person is convicted of the same crime in a state proceeding.]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-20 20:12:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414289821</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rights of being accused </title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414648282</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>this represents a gravel used in the court after the case  is solved and finished at the end </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:12:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414648282</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414653346</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>this is a video of the 5 amendment and to tell you more about it </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Y3EtuCzsGQ" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:18:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414653346</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414655413</link>
         <description><![CDATA[The third section is commonly referred to as the “self-incrimination” clause, and it protects persons accused of committing a crime from being forced to testify against themselves. In the U.S. judicial system a person is presumed innocent, and it is the responsibility of the state (or national government) to prove guilt. Like other pieces of evidence, once presented, words can be used powerfully against a person; however, words can be manipulated in a way that many other objects cannot. Consequently, information gained from sobriety tests, police lineups, voice samples, and the like is constitutionally permissible while evidence gained from compelled testimony is not. As such, persons accused of committing crimes are protected against themselves or, more accurately, how their words may be used against them. The clause, therefore, protects a key aspect of “the system” as well as the rights of the criminally accused.]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:21:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414655413</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414656299</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The fourth section is commonly referred to as the “due process” clause. It protects life, liberty, and property from impairment by the federal government. (The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, protects the same rights from infringement by the states.) Chiefly concerned with fairness and justice, the due process clause seeks to preserve and protect fundamental rights and ensure that any deprivation of life, liberty, or property occurs in accordance with procedural safeguards. As such, there are both substantive and procedural considerations associated with the due process clause, and this has influenced the development of two separate tracks of due process procedural and substantive. Procedural due process pertains to the rules, elements, or methods of enforcement—that is, its procedural aspects. Consider the elements of a fair trial and related Sixth Amendment protections. As long as all relevant rights of the accused are adequately protected—as long as the rules of the game, so to speak, are followed—then the government may, in fact, deprive a person of his life, liberty, or property. But what if the rules are not fair? What if the law itself—regardless of how it is enforced—seemingly deprives rights? This raises the controversial spectre of substantive due process rights. It is not inconceivable that the content of the law, regardless of how it is enforced, is itself repugnant to the Constitution because it violates fundamental rights. Over time, the Supreme Court has had an on-again, off-again relationship with liberty-based due process challenges, but it has generally abided by the principle that certain rights are. implicit in the concept of ordered liberty., and as such they are afforded constitutional protection. This, in turn, has led to the expansion of the meaning of the term liberty. What arguably began as freedom from restraint has transformed into a virtual cornucopia of rights reasonably related to enumerated rights. without which neither liberty nor justice would exist. <br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:22:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414656299</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414658055</link>
         <description><![CDATA[The Fifth Amendment mentions property twice— once in the due process clause and again as the amendment’s entire final clause, commonly known as the “takings clause.” The common denominator of property rights is the concept of fairness that applies to the authority of the federal government to acquire private property. At the time of ratification, property determined wealth and status. It entitled a person to participate in politics and government. It was cherished and keenly protected. Despite this, it was understood that individual rights must sometimes yield to societal rights and that representative governments must accordingly provide the greatest good for the greatest number. The growth and development of the United States ultimately would bring challenges to existing property lines, and it was necessary for an amendment to provide rules governing the acquisition of property. As such, the takings clause empowers the government to exercise eminent domain in order]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:24:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414658055</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414663114</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendment/amendment-v" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:30:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414663114</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414664039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791. The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:31:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414664039</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414665419</link>
         <description><![CDATA[
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that “no person …  shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The right was created in reaction to the excesses of the Courts of Star Chamber and High Commission—British courts of equity that operated from 1487-1641. These courts utilized the inquisitorial method of truth-seeking as opposed to the prosecutorial, meaning that prosecutors did not bear the burden of proving a case, but that sufficient “proof” came from browbeating confessions out of the accused.]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:33:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414665419</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414666160</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2002/02/where-did-the-fifth-amendment-come-from.html" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:33:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414666160</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>5 amendment</title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414666381</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>by dahlia lithwick </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://slate.com/author/dahlia-lithwick" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:34:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414666381</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414670963</link>
         <description><![CDATA[The Fifth Amendment was part of the Bill of Rights that was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. It covers a number of topics and issues including the grand jury, double jeopardy, self-incrimination ("taking the fifth"), due process, and eminent domain. We'll explain each of these in more detail below.
]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:39:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414670963</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>a_kokales0217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414671207</link>
         <description><![CDATA[
The first part of the amendment talks about a grand jury. The grand jury is a jury that decides if a trial should be held. They look at all the evidence and then decide if a person should be charged with a crime. If they decide there is enough evidence, then they will issue an indictment and a regular trial will be held. The grand jury is only used in cases where the punishment for the crime is severe such as life in prison or the death sentence]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-11-21 14:39:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/a_kokales0217/sw7bpugaxgwa/wish/414671207</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
