-MIKKO XYLEXY A. DE VERA

Showing pictures of bad things that happen when people use drugs can help stop teens from using drugs. This method is better than just teaching facts about drugs because it can make a strong impression on teens. Pictures can be more memorable and emotional, making teens think twice about using drugs. Some people might think this method is too extreme, but it can save lives.

STEFANIE RAINE F. MONTEMAYOR

For me, giving information using facts and statistics is more effective. Knowledge lasts longer in the mind than fear.

Carissa mae dulay

I think telling facts is better. Scary pictures might not work because some teens might not believe them. Facts are true and simple, and they help teens think and make the right choice. Knowing the truth can help them stay away from drugs.

-James Austin D. Manaois

Narvasa, Ramielle Anne M.

The second is the “Harm Reduction” approach, which accepts that some people might still use drugs. Instead of only telling them to stop, it focuses on keeping them safe and healthy by reducing the risks involved. I believe this is a more realistic way to help those who are already struggling.

Both methods have good points. Saying no is a strong message for prevention, but harm reduction shows care for people who need support. For me, combining both approaches seems like the best way to really make a difference.

In my opinion, I think showing images of drug consequences is more than enough to prevent teens from drug use. However, it will be more effective and different by applying statistics and facts like saying it's causes and effects or what it is, how do we avoid it.

In the end, education with facts builds understanding and is more effective for long-term prevention.

JHAY ANN C. NARVASA

In my opinion, Some use scary images to stop teens from using drugs, while others teach with facts and statistics. Scary images can create fear, but facts help teens understand the real risks. I think facts are better because they give teens knowledge to make smart choices.

-Marian S. Carrera

- Mac Mac T. Mejia

The prevention of teenage drug use is a critical societal concern. Two prominent approaches dominate the debate: employing fear-inducing imagery of drug consequences and presenting factual, statistical information about the risks. While both methods hold merit, a purely factual and educational approach proves more effective in the long run.

markdonnhiel D. sagisi

There are schools that employ threatening images to prevent teenagers from taking drugs, but some employ statistics and facts. To me, employing facts is best because it makes teenagers aware of the true impact of drugs. They may be scared through such images, but at times they merely laugh or turn a deaf ear.

When we are educated with real information, we reflect more before attempting something risky. It is healthier to know than merely be frightened. That is why I think educating with facts is better.

Scary images can be frightening and sometimes effective, but the effect doesn’t last. Some teens don’t get scared or simply don’t believe them.

For me, it’s better to teach using true and clear information. When teens understand how drugs affect the body and life, they understand better why it’s harmful.

Decisions are stronger when based on the right knowledge. That’s why using facts is better than using fear.

Shaira Mae N. Donato

The second approach focuses on educating teens with real facts and statistics. This method builds knowledge and helps students make informed choices. Instead of being scared, teens understand why drugs are dangerous and how they affect the body and mind. It encourages critical thinking and long-term awareness, which is more helpful in real-life decision-making.

In my opinion, the second approach—teaching facts and statistics—is more effective. When students are given accurate information, they are more likely to trust it and make smart decisions. Fear can fade, but knowledge stays. Education empowers teens to avoid drugs not just out of fear, but out of understanding

Fear-based methods can sometimes make teens feel anxious or even curious, rather than helping them understand the real dangers of drugs. Over time, students may stop taking these images seriously, especially if they think the pictures are too extreme or unrealistic.

On the other hand, when teens are given real information, statistics, and stories based on facts, they are more likely to think carefully about their choices. They can see the real-life consequences of drug use and understand how it affects health, relationships, and future goals. This approach builds awareness and helps them make informed decisions. opinion, teaching teens about the risks of drug use using facts and statistics is a better way to prevent drug use than showing scary images. While scary pictures might shock students, they do not always lead to long-term understanding or behavior change.

Fear-based methods can sometimes make teens feel anxious or even curious, rather than helping them understand the real danger

On the other hand, when teens are given real information, statistics, and stories based on facts, they are more likely to think carefully about their choices. They can see the real-life consequences of drug use and understand how it affects health, relationships, and future goals. This approach builds awareness and helps them make informed decisions.

-Arjan Carlo T. Laguesma

There are two main approaches to drug prevention in schools. One is showing scary images of the harmful effects of drug use, while the other focuses on teaching teens the risks using facts and statistics. The first method tries to shock students into avoiding drugs by making them afraid. The second method aims to inform them with real data, helping them understand the consequences.

While both methods have their merits, I believe teaching with facts and statistics is more effective. Fear may work for a short time, but it doesn’t always lead to long-term understanding. When students are given clear information, they are more likely to make informed choices. Knowledge builds confidence and responsibility, while fear may lead to confusion or rebellion.