<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Honor Code Models by Melissa McCarter</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-01-30 03:26:43 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-01-30 14:08:07 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Score: 6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226069187</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Scoring Guide Elements: "The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and sufficient. The language may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear."<br><br></div><div>Essay Elements: "According to the research cited in Source C, students at colleges with honor codes cheat less. I could see this being true because no matter whether someone is generally a cheater or not, no one wants to be suspended or expelled."</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:53:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226069187</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>nicolebre1688</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226069583</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the ending of the intro "I would also add that it should be student created" can be put elsewhere to make the intro flow more.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:54:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226069583</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sample Z - 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070213</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sample Z is a 4 because there is little original thought, but rather regurgitated information from the original sources that were given. It also doesn't talk about the writer's school specifically so there is not a completely clear argument.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:55:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070213</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>nicolebre1688</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070585</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The writer used too many sources of evidence in the second paragraph; they could've Incorporated one of those pieces of evidence in another paragraph, or only talked about one source per paragraph </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:56:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070585</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4- Underdeveloped argument. prose isn&#39;t very sophisticated. </title>
         <author>ryahwal0692</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070838</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:56:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070838</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Score: 1</title>
         <author>emilyzuk2249</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070844</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Scoring Guide Elements: "The sources may dominate the student's attempts at development".</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:56:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070844</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>¨lands as 52%, senselessly high punishment for cheating, including expulsion, and even senate members who criticize the use of the honor code.¨</title>
         <author>kiarater7440</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070947</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:56:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226070947</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071081</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sample J is awkwardly worded (doesn't use sophisticated prose) and doesn't show understanding of the sources. It uses a closed thesis statement and includes evidence as part of the thesis, which should be more based on ideas than facts. Overall the argument isn't well developed.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:57:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071081</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sample Z could be a 4. While it uses evidence to support the student&#39;s argument, the connection between the sources and argument is a bit strained. When citing evidence, it just uses another source and says it supports it.</title>
         <author>varshneket1629</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:57:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Score: 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071542</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This essay is strong in its explanation of the actual documents, but it cannot relate any of the samples to its own school or argument. The language is both informal and insufficient to clearly convey its desired message.<br><br>Guidlines:<br>"<strong>They develop their argument by synthesizing at least two sources, but the evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:57:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071542</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Score : 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071781</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:58:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226071781</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226072196</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>informal: "Once a cheater always a cheater"<br>summary of sources</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 13:59:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226072196</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Solid 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226072735</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sample Q is a solid 4 and I'll tell you why. This 4 is the most 4 that I've seen in a long time. This could be huge if true. If you look closely, Q and 4 rhyme, so if you think about it, it's extended symbolism from the beginning.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:00:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226072735</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>writer uses many sources without an strong warrant behind them</title>
         <author>kenedibar4191</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226072815</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>"source b has a direct quote from the author..... this trusting and relaxed feel around other students.."<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:00:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226072815</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226073800</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sample Q's argument isn't that justifiable because it only makes sense if the reader knows a"person with no honor". If the reader isn't familiar with that kind of person, it isn't relatable nor a strong argument</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:02:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226073800</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>actual score: 2</title>
         <author>ryahwal0692</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226075502</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-30 14:05:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melissa_mccarter/sswj5tkyla7j/wish/226075502</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
